Hi!
Thanks a lot everybody! I did not think my question would raise such an issue :)
Indeed, i resolved my problem finding something strange : I made a backtrace and
i found that :
| Current directory is /usr/sbin/
| GNU gdb 19991004
| [snip]
| This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"...
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:49:20AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
This sounds like an excellent idea. This would surely help most users who
would like to use RPMs, and reduce the number of issues with mismatched
RPMs causing
Last things : i tried the solution in the FAQ, i.e. to change the
SSLSessionCache directive arguments, but i'm running apache
from a rpm, so i
don't have mm support, and my project manager will kick me
if i say that i
have to recompile apache :/, so i'd like to avoid that.
No one has had
Maybe if everyone used the RPMs you rolled there wouldn't be
any problems,
but it seems that people want to take one RPM from every site,
throw them
all together, and hope they work. Then they don't because one package
wasn't compiled with the right options (like EAPI) There just
seems to be
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
What. The apache-mod_ssl RPM is one of the easier RPM to install.
Many Redhat users have switched from Apache-SSL to Apache-mod_ssl
since it's a plugin replacement of standard Redhat apache.
If you haven't succeed in
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
What. The apache-mod_ssl RPM is one of the easier RPM to install.
Many Redhat users have switched from Apache-SSL to Apache-mod_ssl
since it's a plugin replacement of standard Redhat apache.
I can't say that I've tried any of the
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 08:16:45PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
I can't say that I've tried any of the rpm's (but then I've always
preferred to build stuff from scratch ;-)
I'm sure you're right when you say that the rpm's are easy to use,
but I think we've seen a growing number of problems
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:49:20AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
This sounds like an excellent idea. This would surely help most users who
would like to use RPMs, and reduce the number of issues with mismatched
RPMs causing problems. Now, who's going to do it? ;-)
As I said, I'll do it - if
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Hugues Pisapia wrote:
And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes from openssl or modssl as i tried
many configurations. Apache gets SEGVs only when the virtual host with
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 02:07:51AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Hugues Pisapia wrote:
And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes from openssl or modssl as i tried
many
No one has had good luck when using RPMs to install mod_ssl. I'm afraid that
recompiling Apache from scratch is the way to go.
What's the problem with the RPMs?
I roll them, and if you got a RPM specific porblem,
I'll be happy to look at it.
Maybe if everyone used the RPMs you rolled
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 09:03:57AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
No one has had good luck when using RPMs to install mod_ssl. I'm afraid that
recompiling Apache from scratch is the way to go.
What's the problem with the RPMs?
I roll them, and if you got a RPM specific porblem,
I'll
Hi all!
I'm running that :
Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
mod_ssl/2.6.5
OpenSSL/0.9.5a
mod_perl/1.21
ApacheJServ/1.1.2
And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes
13 matches
Mail list logo
