Hi!
Thanks a lot everybody! I did not think my question would raise such an issue :)
Indeed, i resolved my problem finding something strange : I made a backtrace and
i found that :
| Current directory is /usr/sbin/
| GNU gdb 19991004
| [snip]
| This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"...
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:49:20AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> >
> > This sounds like an excellent idea. This would surely help most users who
> > would like to use RPMs, and reduce the number of issues with mismatched
> > RPMs causin
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:49:20AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
>
> This sounds like an excellent idea. This would surely help most users who
> would like to use RPMs, and reduce the number of issues with mismatched
> RPMs causing problems. Now, who's going to do it? ;-)
>
As I said, I'll do it -
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 08:16:45PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
>
> I can't say that I've tried any of the rpm's (but then I've always
> preferred to build stuff from scratch ;-)
> I'm sure you're right when you say that the rpm's are easy to use,
> but I think we've seen a growing number of problem
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> What. The apache-mod_ssl RPM is one of the easier RPM to install.
> Many Redhat users have switched from Apache-SSL to Apache-mod_ssl
> since it's a plugin replacement of standard Redhat apache.
I can't say that I've tried any of
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> What. The apache-mod_ssl RPM is one of the easier RPM to install.
> Many Redhat users have switched from Apache-SSL to Apache-mod_ssl
> since it's a plugin replacement of standard Redhat apache.
>
> If you haven't succeed in inst
>Maybe if everyone used the RPMs you rolled there wouldn't be
>any problems,
>but it seems that people want to take one RPM from every site,
>throw them
>all together, and hope they work. Then they don't because one package
>wasn't compiled with the right options (like EAPI) There just
>seems
>> Last things : i tried the solution in the FAQ, i.e. to change the
>> SSLSessionCache directive arguments, but i'm running apache
>from a rpm, so i
>> don't have mm support, and my project manager will kick me
>if i say that i
>> have to recompile apache :/, so i'd like to avoid that.
>
>No
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 09:03:57AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> > > No one has had good luck when using RPMs to install mod_ssl. I'm afraid that
> > > recompiling Apache from scratch is the way to go.
> >
> > What's the problem with the RPMs?
> >
> > I roll them, and if you got a RPM specific por
> > No one has had good luck when using RPMs to install mod_ssl. I'm afraid that
> > recompiling Apache from scratch is the way to go.
>
> What's the problem with the RPMs?
>
> I roll them, and if you got a RPM specific porblem,
> I'll be happy to look at it.
Maybe if everyone used the RPMs yo
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 02:07:51AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Hugues Pisapia wrote:
>
> > And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
> > Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes from openssl or modssl as i tried
> > ma
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Hugues Pisapia wrote:
> And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
> Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes from openssl or modssl as i tried
> many configurations. Apache gets SEGVs only when the virtual host with mo
Hi all!
I'm running that :
Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
mod_ssl/2.6.5
OpenSSL/0.9.5a
mod_perl/1.21
ApacheJServ/1.1.2
And sometimes (well, more often with MSIE than with Mozilla :), apache gets
Segmentation faults. It seems that it comes f
13 matches
Mail list logo
