I have tried to contact the author of Resources.pm with some patches to
make his release work with more recent versions of Perl, to no avail.
I tried his CPAN-advertised email address as well as the one listed at
his webpage and both bounced... my last email to him continues below
-
* James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-04 23:19]:
> So that's why I've been sending the "To:" copy to the OP or the
> person to whom I'm directly replying or quoting most
> frequently, and "Cc:"ing the list. But that means the "To:"
> recipient gets 2 copies. Is this a case where business
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:09:10 -0500, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>
>
> P.S. I'm not sure if the CC method of replying is automatic or
> not, but I'm subscribed to the list, so I'm getting two copies of
> everything.
I wonder what is proper Usenet etiquette. In the business world, you direct the reply
"To
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:09:10 -0500, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>[snip]
> Sorry to get into so much detail, but the gist of it is that it is
> a complex problem set which is simplified by providing a single
> program interface for the manipulation of any entity.
Agreed. Get the interface to be the way y
> The following was supposedly scribed by
> James E Keenan
> on Saturday 04 October 2003 05:49 pm:
>Eric's description seems to be more bringing code from the side rather than
> from above/below, so that's why I'm inclined to advise an Exporter-approach
> rather than an OO. We would probably have
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 14:06:13 -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:34:14PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
>
>>
>> .. that package Drawing is so huge that it's cumbersome to edit
>> and you simply want to store some of its publicly callable
>> methods in other packages. If so, then
> The following was supposedly scribed by
> Mark Stosberg
> on Saturday 04 October 2003 02:06 pm:
>While this is certainly more explicit, it also means that every time
>you create or rename a shared routine, you have to declare and at least
>two places. Perhaps being explicit is it's own reward. I
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:34:14PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
>
> .. that package Drawing is so huge that it's cumbersome to edit and you simply want
> to store some of its publicly callable methods in other packages. If so, then you
> could simply import the methods from the "sub"-modules usi
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:59:14 -0500, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> I'm working on a module which will eventually be CAD::Drawing
> Currently, it is named ::Drawing and
> the package is declared as simply "Drawing".
>
> I've run into a wall with my original data structure and have seen
> a much more flexible
Hi,
I'm working on a module which will eventually be CAD::Drawing
Currently, it is named ::Drawing and the package
is declared as simply "Drawing".
I've run into a wall with my original data structure and have seen a much more
flexible and expandable way to do things, so I will be rebuilding t
10 matches
Mail list logo
