Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe there should be a module on CPAN (and maybe even distributed in > core perl?) > that list some of the major licenses *with their full text*. Then both I don't know if the full text is necessary. I have a boilerpla

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would also note that the META.yml license field is insufficiently > > documented, and that what little documentation there is shows that t

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:28 PM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:54:01PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:30 PM, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gabor Szabo wrote: > > > > As I am usually using Module::Build I did not

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread Ken Williams
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would also note that the META.yml license field is insufficiently > documented, and that what little documentation there is shows that the > spec is buggy. This page: > http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spe

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread Ken Williams
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyway, META.yml's licence field is insufficient. A distribution may > contain code and documentation under several different licences. My > most recent release, for example, contains some GPLed code, some > perl-

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-31T11:28:49] > If you only care that it be free software, then you needn't bother, as that's > one of the pre-requisites for something being on the CPAN. I don't believe that's actually true. Is there some requirement, when uploading, that one has agr

Re: license in META.yml

2008-03-31 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:54:01PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:30 PM, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gabor Szabo wrote: > > > As I am usually using Module::Build I did not know that a recent > > > version of MakeMaker > > > has started to support the LICENS