On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would also note that the META.yml license field is insufficiently > documented, and that what little documentation there is shows that the > spec is buggy. This page: > http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-current.html#license > > says that it is required, and that the list of valid options is in the > Module::Build manpage. There is no such list here: > http://search.cpan.org/~kwilliams/Module-Build-0.2808/lib/Module/Build.pm
By the way, I think one thing we need to change is to put the list of valid options directly in the spec, and tell the reader of M::B::API where the authoritative list is. Agreed. -Ken
