José Castro wrote:
Hi, guys.
I recently wrote a guide for creating Perl modules. It's available on
perlmonks, at http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=431702. (If you want to I
can also send it here)
I just realized a note to this list would be in order, so here it is
:-)
Enjoy,
jac
PS: Yes, thoughts are
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Cédric Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-10 10:25]:
Thank you for the hint. I quickly looked on CPAN and there
doesn't seem to be many modules under Cluster::, besides
Cluster::Init which is more geared towards High Availability.
I don't find Cluster:: sounds right.
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ofer Nave [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-02 03:55]:
I hate to force people to create an anonymous hash when it can
be implied. Plus I'm already checking for hashref as the first
param to allow options to be specified, so I'd have to change
that... to what, I don't know
Buddy Burden wrote:
Ofer,
In my case, it's much easier to pick off the first entry than the list.
Why?
my $opts = @_ ref $_[-1] eq 'HASH' ? pop : {};
my ($proj, @files) = @_;
(from some code of mine; I have many functions defined like this)
-- Buddy
Ok, fine. That was a total
Austin Schutz wrote:
I suppose I could try to create a use divide 0/undef/inf/crap pragma.
Then you could do whatever you want. You'd still get a surprise if you ever
forgot it though..
I think that's the best answer. Not a good idea for most programs,
wonderful idea for math programs -
Mark Stosberg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 02:40:36PM -0800, Ofer Nave wrote:
# getting fancy with arg binding
my @hosts = qw( foo bar baz );
prun( map { my $host = $_; sub { test_host( $host ) } } @hosts )
or die( Parallel::Simple::errplus() );
I think this is simpler, because I can
Andrew Savige wrote:
--- Ofer Nave wrote:
Here's the POD for my new Parallel::Simple module:
Interface
-
To me, offering both:
Parallel::Simple::run()
and:
Parallel::Simple-run()
just makes the interface bigger -- more for the user to read and
grok -- without any benefit
Buddy Burden wrote:
Ofer,
With all due respect to Andrew, please remember that his is but one
opinion.
I've also now removed any traces of the run() synonym. You're right
- why complicate things with no benefit.
I didn't see anything wrong with the concept. Personally I would have
done it
Andy Lester wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:05:09PM -0500, Mark Stosberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was hoping for more of a comparison with Data::Page, which is similar but
already established.
AND at 100% Devel::Cover coverage, thanks to yours truly! :-)
xoxo,
Andy
I've never
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ofer Nave [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-28 22:55]:
I've been thinking for a while that it would be great to have a
CPAN wiki for things like:
[...]
I enjoyed writing the Parallel::* comparison, and I believe it
is useful, but honestly, it doesn't belong in the SEE ALSO
10 matches
Mail list logo
