(Andreas J. Koenig) wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:11:43 -0800, "Joshua ben Jore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
> This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
> CPAN. Would the responsible parties pleas
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:34:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Excuse me, but Time::Cubic is no joke. It is a testament to the great
> Gene Ray, and the message he has brought us from the year 2051. If
CPAN is not a repository of testaments. No one opposes the publication
of the
* Chuck Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 23:10]:
> Given the fact that the module contains a swastika, one must
> suppose that this code breaks German law.
That alone does not mean it breaks German law, no. It does break
German law in more ways than one because free speech in Germany
is qualif
On Feb 8, 4:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Rockway) wrote:
> David Landgren wrote:
> > Continuing as the devil's advocate, I still can't decide if that's just
> > a parody on the whole license issue. It's just too over the top.
>
> > That said, I agree that CPAN doesn't have to be the vector fo
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:11:43 -0800, "Joshua ben Jore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
> This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
> CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, p
Randy Kobes wrote:
Perhaps, if nothing else, the terms of usage of the package:
http://search.cpan.org/src/BANTOWN/Time-Cubic-1.0/LICENSE
by which one *must* commit at least three violations of the named parts
of the US Criminal Code to use it, makes it
unsuitable for CPAN.
Hmm, SNMP::APCU
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:24 AM, IvorW wrote:
Ahah, now I see the correct module name, I can browse the source and
see what the issue is. The only difficulty is that the module could
be somebody's incredibly poor taste sick joke, and people could raise
the old chestnut a
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:24 AM, IvorW wrote:
Ahah, now I see the correct module name, I can browse the source
and see what the issue is. The only difficulty is that the module
could be somebody's incredibly poor taste sick joke, and people
could raise the old chestnut argument about free speech
On 2/8/07, IvorW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahah, now I see the correct module name, I can browse the source and see
what the issue is. The only difficulty is that the module could be
somebody's incredibly poor taste sick joke, and people could raise the old
chestnut argument about free speech.
On 08/02/07, imacat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:28:12 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from Andy Lester
> # on Wednesday 07 February 2007 10:25 pm:
> >> I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
> >> This is the kind of content that
David Landgren wrote:
> Continuing as the devil's advocate, I still can't decide if that's just
> a parody on the whole license issue. It's just too over the top.
>
> That said, I agree that CPAN doesn't have to be the vector for
> distributing this useless drivel. While the license gave me a big
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:20 AM, David Landgren wrote:
I recommed against deleting it, because that only add fuel to the
fire. The crackpot who uploaded this drivel in the first place will
be able to crow freedom of speech and it's all a communist plot,
there really is a perl cabal and they're
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Tim Maher wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:58:01AM -0800, alan wrote:
On a more serious side, getting rid of it [Time::Cubic] should be
pretty open and shut. CPAN is a public resource managed by private
entities.
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in a
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
Perhaps, if nothing else, the terms of usage of the package:
http://search.cpan.org/src/BANTOWN/Time-Cubic-1.0/LICENSE
by which one *must* commit at least three violations of the named parts
of the US Criminal Code to use it, makes it
unsuitable for CPAN.
Continu
Tim Maher schreef:
> I'm generally against the idea of censorship in all its forms
This has nothing to do with censorship. Somebody is dropping garbage in
our yard. If that person just wants to cause trouble and doesn't remove
it, luckily somebody else will be so good.
--
Affijn, Ruud
"Gewoon
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Tim Maher wrote:
[ ... ]
I now understand why so many people were voting for "censorship", with
so few defending the rights of the programmer. Given what we're dealing
with, I'm now in agreement that this "Module" is effectively spam,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Tim Maher wrote:
[ ... ]
I now understand why so many people were voting for "censorship", with
so few defending the rights of the programmer. Given what we're dealing
with, I'm now in agreement that this "Module" is effectively spam, and
should be treated accordingly.
Perh
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:12:44PM +, Steve Pitchford wrote:
> Tim Maher wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:58:01AM -0800, alan wrote:
> >
> >>>On a more serious side, getting rid of it [Time::Cubic] should be
> >>>pretty open and shut. CPAN is a public resource managed by private
> >>>en
Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
Just to clarify for the curio
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Tim Maher wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:58:01AM -0800, alan wrote:
On a more serious side, getting rid of it [Time::Cubic] should be
pretty open and shut. CPAN is a public resource managed by private
entities.
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in a
Tim Maher wrote:
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in all its forms, ...
Are you equally outraged by the fact that this list goes through a spam
filter? That "module" is just spam.
--
Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Washington, DC
Tim Maher wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:58:01AM -0800, alan wrote:
On a more serious side, getting rid of it [Time::Cubic] should be
pretty open and shut. CPAN is a public resource managed by private
entities.
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in all its forms, and
/d
Given:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:20:18 +0100
David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recommed against deleting it, because that only add fuel to the fire.
and:
> I would also recommend writing your (*) opinion about the module by
> means of reviews on cpanratings, as well as annocpa
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:58:01AM -0800, alan wrote:
> >
> >On a more serious side, getting rid of it [Time::Cubic] should be
> >pretty open and shut. CPAN is a public resource managed by private
> >entities.
I'm generally against the idea of censorship in all its forms, and
/definitely/ against
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:34:12 -0600
Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But when it's useless AND in bad taste, it's not doing anything good
> for anyone, so why should the CPAN mirror it? What's the advantage
> for anyone?
Jonathan++. I'm all for removing it from CPAN and shutting
On 8 Feb 2007, at 17:36, David Landgren wrote:
And as we all know, 99% of modules these days are found through
searches. I would recommend a much more subtle approach: ask
Andreas and Randy to... oops... accidentally remove it from their
indices, and therefore when people search for Time::,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Rockway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> If I were in charge, this module would be deleted and the
> PAUSE account disabled.
++.
- Dmitri.
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 8 Feb 2007, at 17:20, David Landgren wrote:
And as we all know, 99% of modules these days are found through
searches. I would recommend a much more subtle approach: ask Andreas
and Randy to... oops... accidentally remove it from their indices, and
therefore when people
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, David Landgren wrote:
Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
Ok, lot of valid arguments
David Landgren wrote:
> I recommend against deleting it, because that only add fuel to the fire.
> The crackpot who uploaded this drivel in the first place will be able to
> crow freedom of speech and it's all a communist plot, there really is a
> perl cabal and they're out to get me and blah blah
On 8 Feb 2007, at 17:20, David Landgren wrote:
And as we all know, 99% of modules these days are found through
searches. I would recommend a much more subtle approach: ask
Andreas and Randy to... oops... accidentally remove it from their
indices, and therefore when people search for Time::,
Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
Ok, lot of valid arguments that I agree with more or less, so I'm goin
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: imacat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 08 February 2007 15:06
>> To: Perl Module Authors List
>> Subject: Re: Delete hate speech module
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:28:12 -0800
>> Eri
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Chris wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, alan wrote:
And it is not even a usable piece of code.
Well, it did pass all of the automated tests.
http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/Time-Cubic.html#Time-Cubic-1.0
But you are right. It pretty much doesn't even do anything useful at al
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, alan wrote:
> And it is not even a usable piece of code.
Well, it did pass all of the automated tests.
http://cpantesters.perl.org/show/Time-Cubic.html#Time-Cubic-1.0
But you are right. It pretty much doesn't even do anything useful at all.
On a more serious side, getting
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
It is actually Time::Cubic.
Wow! Imagine if Doct
> On 08 Feb 2007 10:24:13 -0500
> IvorW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I> Ahah, now I see the correct module name, I can browse the source
I> and see what the issue is. The only difficulty is that the module
I> could be somebody's incredibly poor taste sick joke, and people
I> could raise the old ches
> -Original Message-
> From: imacat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 February 2007 15:06
> To: Perl Module Authors List
> Subject: Re: Delete hate speech module
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:28:12 -0800
> Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8 Feb 2007, at 15:06, imacat wrote:
Correction: Time::Cubic.
I got some Time Cube madness on an old blog a few years ago:
http://www.shitshifter.com/forum.jsp?nid=237
See posts by "HEED CUBIC PROPHECIES TO AVERT CUBELESS DOOM"
- --
Andy A
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:28:12 -0800
Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from Andy Lester
> # on Wednesday 07 February 2007 10:25 pm:
> >> I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
> >> This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
> >> CPAN. Wou
# from Andy Lester
# on Wednesday 07 February 2007 10:25 pm:
>> I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
>> This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
>> CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
>
>It's deserving, but I'd
On Feb 7, 2007, at 10:11 PM, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
It's deserving, but I'd sure rather not
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
Just to clarify for the curious, to see the bile y
I'd just read of Time::Cube, a disjointed rant full of hate speech.
This is the kind of content that is most deserving of deletion from
CPAN. Would the responsible parties please go nuke this, please?
Josh
44 matches
Mail list logo
