# from Ken Williams
# on Monday 15 October 2007 20:13:
I recently had half-a-go at adding a fourth alternative besides
'core', 'site', and 'vendor', called 'auto'. It would sense whether
the given module was currently installed in a core lib, and if so
would choose 'core'. Otherwise
On 10/16/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Williams wrote:
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Hi all,
Steve is proposing that we add the following parameter to Build.PL
installdirs = ($] = 5.009004 ? 'core' : 'site'),
demerphq wrote:
Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards. It
should
be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor.
Isnt the reason security? Although I am surprised that vendor is after site.
How does security enter into it?
Locally installed modules (site) trump
On 10/16/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
demerphq wrote:
Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards. It
should
be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor.
Isnt the reason security? Although I am surprised that vendor is after site.
How does
On 10/16/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
demerphq wrote:
On 10/16/07, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
demerphq wrote:
Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards. It
should
be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor.
Isnt the reason
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Tuesday 16 October 2007 05:07:
Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards.
It should be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor.
I guess Debian reached that conclusion long ago.
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Tuesday 16 October 2007 05:07:
Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards.
It should be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor.
I guess Debian reached that conclusion long ago.
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Hi all,
Steve is proposing that we add the following parameter to Build.PL
installdirs = ($] = 5.009004 ? 'core' : 'site'),
Is that the preferred way of handling this?
Yes.
--
The interface should be as clean as newly fallen snow and its behavior
as explicit as
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:14 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Hi all,
Steve is proposing that we add the following parameter to Build.PL
installdirs = ($] = 5.009004 ? 'core' : 'site'),
Is that the preferred way of handling this?
Yes.
I recently had half-a-go at adding a
