Re: [MOPO] FW: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-21 Thread Freedom Lover
ion To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:50 AM Subject: [MOPO] FW: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid MOPO:   I am sorry to have to share my response to JR with you all, BUT my private email to him

[MOPO] FW: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-21 Thread Video Den Collection
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JRSent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:30 AMTo: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDUSubject: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid To those who care to read it, I'm sorry for the length of this post, but I need to set the record straight before d

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Richard Halegua Comic Art
. honestly. > > I don't think one person should ever be the reason you leave a group as it > is a 'group'. > > I'm quite saddened by this. > > Shelly > > > > ----Original Message Follows > From: Freedom Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Gordon DeVinney
riginal Message Follows > From: Freedom Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Freedom Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU > Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, > I'm afraid > Date: Tue, 19 Sep

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Gordon DeVinney
o one did even that much and > that really cuts the legs out of my feeling that MOPO is worth spending any > time on right now. > > Later, > > -- JR > > > - Original Message - > From: Freedom Lover > To: JR ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU > Sent: Tu

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Freedom Lover
  - Original Message - From: Freedom Lover To: JR ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:29 Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid I don't blame you, J.R.  When reading your post and

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Shelly Whitworth-King
Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Freedom Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:29:17 -0400 I don't blame you, J.R. When reading your po

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Sean Linkenback
I think it took longer for my computer to download all the type in JR’s previous message than it does to download the photo’s from Richie’s messages.   Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___ How

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread JR
from you, no one did even that much and that really cuts the legs out of my feeling that MOPO is worth spending any time on right now.   Later,   -- JR   - Original Message - From: Freedom Lover To: JR ; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:29 Subject: Re

Re: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread Freedom Lover
MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:29 AM Subject: [MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid To those who care to read it, I'm sorry for the length of this post, but I need to set the record straight before

[MOPO] This does not go unanswered -- long out of necessity, I'm afraid

2006-09-19 Thread JR
To those who care to read it, I'm sorry for the length of this post, but I need to set the record straight before departing:   Recently, in a 24-hour period, Susan Olson sent 5 separate public messages to this list in which she violated the long-standing rule of no personal attacks. In each