Thanks Matt for the promotion! I’ve been using this ducttape workflow for about
6 months and is pretty happy with it. That’s why I thought it’s time to give it
a bigger audience.
I agree ducttape is a bit under-maintained at this moment (the core code is
left there for ~4 years without any con
W dniu 27.11.2017 o 11:19, Barry Haddow pisze:
>
> For the marian usage examples, I would go for the lowest common
> denominator - shell scripts. Generally more readable than Makefiles.
Good point. My needs for experimental set-ups does not necessarily
overlap with readable tutorials.
___
Hi All
I did produce a version of experiment.perl for Groundhog (remember
that?) but it's not much use for any other nmt system. The problem (well
actually the big advantage!) of nmt is that the pipeline is too simple
for a tool like experiment.perl. And the experiments that do need tool
suppo
Dou you have an URL or repo for that?
W dniu 26.11.2017 o 14:58, Ondrej Bojar pisze:
> I can really recommend Eman to people interested in spawning dozens of
> similar experiments, by deriving new variations from older ones. Eman will
> take care of reusing reusable bits and creating new bits as
I can really recommend Eman to people interested in spawning dozens of similar
experiments, by deriving new variations from older ones. Eman will take care of
reusing reusable bits and creating new bits as needed. So e.g. corpus
preprocessing, bpe etc. could be reused when you want to try new tr
This looks good.
OK, I guess ducttape it is.
W dniu 26.11.2017 o 14:56, Matt Post pisze:
> Shuoyang Ding put this together recently:
>
> https://github.com/shuoyangd/tape4nmt
>
> matt
>
>
>> On Nov 26, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ondrej,
>> you do not seem c
Shuoyang Ding put this together recently:
https://github.com/shuoyangd/tape4nmt
matt
> On Nov 26, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ondrej,
> you do not seem confident enough to recommend Eman :)
>
> I now took another look at duct tape. That does not look too
Hi Ondrej,
you do not seem confident enough to recommend Eman :)
I now took another look at duct tape. That does not look too bad,
basically Make with multi-targets and easier reuse of existing recipes
(which is a nightmare in GNU make).
Is anyone still using duct tape, commit dates are from two
Hi Ergun,
Thank you for answer. However, for clarification, I am well aware how to
do preprocessing (and it's still evil :) ), that's not my point.
I am just asking whether we have now some smarter tools around that help
with the experimental setup and management, for instance for better
dissem
Hi, Marcin.
I am afraid you are correct. I have my Eman and a couple of my students are
using it (we have Neural Monkey, Nematus, t2t and probably already also Marian
in), but it has a rather steep learning curve and it generally has other bells
and whistles that what someone with data and desi
Dear Marcin,
I have uploaded my EMS files for WMT'16:
https://github.com/bicici/ParFDAWMT16
Text processing steps can be language-dependent, might require domain
knowledge and expertise, and distinct you from others elevating your
results.
I suggest reading relevant sections from the papers of WM
Hi list,
I am preparing a couple of usage example for my NMT toolkit and got hung
up on all the preprocessing and other evil stuff. I am wondering is
there now anything decent around for doing preprocessing, running
experiments and evaluation? Or is the best thing still GNU make (isn't
that em
12 matches
Mail list logo