It's gone from pretty stable in 0.9.6 to buggy in 0.9.7. Lots of
obnoxious gui bugs and trouble with downloads now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool. If only I could afford IDSL #$@%
Cat
http://www.ratrobot.com/charity/charityframeset.htm What is charity?
Is it charitable to give people a blanket but not a job? In this
article I will explore exactly what charity is.
http://www.ratrobot.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you want a REAL challenge follow me to aus.sport.aussie-rules ;)
We won the competition this year http://www.lions.com.au/
Go Lions!
Cat
http://www.ratrobot.com/charity/charityframeset.htm What is charity?
Is it charitable to give people a blan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Not if you're using CVS, which unless you are you shouldn't bother. The
>initial checkout will take forever, but so little changes day-to-day
>that updates happen extrememly quickly. I did this myself for a while
>over 56K until I got it through my
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
>
> Not if you're using CVS, which unless you are you shouldn't bother.
> The initial checkout will take forever, but so little changes
> day-to-day that updates happen extrememly quickly. I did this
>
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Nope, it's possible. You just have to do the work.
>>
>> Mozilla currently renders it's own controls so all it uses are the
>> basic drawing routines. It currently use
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
> Yep, I as a web user somehow care about that. Right, you get the
> job of explaining that to the dozens of Mozilla users.
Considering there is no one to complain to at Mozilla, as there is no
end user
Would anyone please help me. How
come all my incoming email goes to
my
trash folder instead of
inbox...thanks
Jonas Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Minko Markov wrote:
>
> > How can one check whether this security manager is
...
>
> http://gemal.dk/browserspy/psm.html
>
> --
> /Jonas
VariableSetting
Cat wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is it practicle to help out over a dialup connection? Is anyone doing
> it? Broadband is pretty expensive where I live. I assume that you would
> be doing A LOT of downloading of the latest build.
>
Not if you're using CVS, whi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Nope, it's possible. You just have to do the work.
>
> Mozilla currently renders it's own controls so all it uses are the basic
> drawing routines. It currently uses GTK on linux, but it doesn't use
> GTK's scroll bars, it just draws it's own.
>
In other words, li
"David W. Fenton" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JTK) wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >the
> >overall theory of operation of Mozilla is to completely crap out
> >if an "I" isn't crossed or a "T" isn't dotted in the HTML*, but
> >what do you expect from AOL? I mean hell, it's not like they ow
Minko Markov wrote:
>
> How can one check whether this security manager is
> installed? I mean, it is pointless arguing about
> that here, if one can check that in a second.
http://gemal.dk/browserspy/psm.html
--
/Jonas
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> What part of the mozilla code (win32) does it contain?
>
> I ask this since all of my crashes seem to happen in this DLL
>
>
You may be interested in this bug:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116487
--
Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion
Novell MCNE-5/CNI-
What part of the mozilla code (win32) does it contain?
I ask this since all of my crashes seem to happen in this DLL
nearco wrote:
> How do these differ? What is the main difference?
>
>
Tabs were added since 0.9.4 which I think a lot of people consider a
major feature plus just general speed/stability and other small features...
nearco wrote:
> How do these differ? What is the main difference?
LOTS , a major XUL speedup code reduction and timer changes
were checked in after the branch
Cat wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is it practicle to help out over a dialup connection? Is anyone doing
> it? Broadband is pretty expensive where I live. I assume that you would
> be doing A LOT of downloading of the latest build.
a dialup is fine - I pulled 2 cvs
"Jonas Jørgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Oh no! You didn't recommend Mozilla to end users, did you? Now we'll
> have all these people asking for technical support in the Mozilla
> newsgroups! :-(
>
Don't worry, we've got our own support
> Ian Thomas wrote:
>> IMO it should be one of the mozilla1.0 criteria to remove _all_
>> non-red-dinosaur images from Mozilla.
Thomas wrote:
> Hmmm... no you can't be serious. I see all these neat icons - all to be
> replaced with red dinosaurs? Can see it now - red dinosaur holds a
> packag
How do these differ? What is the main difference?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Minko Markov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It is not so apparent to me that this is the reason.
>Maybe, maybe not, but the lack of error message like
>"you must have the security manager installed before
>proceeding" suggests the reason is something else,
>most likel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it practicle to help out over a dialup connection? Is anyone doing
it? Broadband is pretty expensive where I live. I assume that you would
be doing A LOT of downloading of the latest build.
Cat
http://www.ratrobot.com/charity/charityframeset.ht
Nope, it's possible. You just have to do the work.
Mozilla currently renders it's own controls so all it uses are the basic
drawing routines. It currently uses GTK on linux, but it doesn't use
GTK's scroll bars, it just draws it's own.
S. Merde wrote:
> So I take it by the lack of comments
So I take it by the lack of comments that it's impossible to port
Mozilla over to other toolkits?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (S. Merde) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Would a port of Mozilla to the FOX GUI Toolkit
> (http://www.fox-toolkit.org) be feasible or even possible? Since FOX
>
On 12/25/01 9:51 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> How can I export my mail from Outlook 2000 and import it to Netscape?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
> Netscape what ??? Communicator ?? NS 6.x ??? Mozilla ??
If I am not mistaken, both Netscape 4.79 and 6.21 import Outlook
messages directly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JTK) wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>the
>overall theory of operation of Mozilla is to completely crap out
>if an "I" isn't crossed or a "T" isn't dotted in the HTML*, but
>what do you expect from AOL? I mean hell, it's not like they own
>Time Warner or something!
If IE had n
Responding to my own post.
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
> Mac version:
-snip-
> Apparently fixed:
>
> Preferences widow is now adjustable and does not clip part of the text
> or buttons on adjustments.You can now set all preferences at one whack
> without have to set eac
Robert wrote:
> How can I export my mail from Outlook 2000 and import it to Netscape?
>
> Thanks.
Netscape what ??? Communicator ?? NS 6.x ??? Mozilla ??
Communicator: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
NS 6: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscpae.netscape6.windows
--
Jay Garc
Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 25 Dec 2001:
> I agree that offending people may not be friendly. But it is also a
> way to be succesfull - I remember hearing something about an
> obscure tv series named 'south park' or so. And installing Mozilla
Ian Thomas wrote:
> IMO it should be one of the mozilla1.0 criteria to remove _all_
> non-red-dinosaur images from Mozilla.
Hmmm... no you can't be serious. I see all these neat icons - all to be
replaced with red dinosaurs? Can see it now - red dinosaur holds a
package (attachment). Red di
Title: Sports Interaction is the first online sportsbook to be fully licensed
and regulated in North America
Get
your game on with pro football at the world's most interactive venue
for sportsbetting...
10%
basic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> if you can, put the page up somewhere where we can test it. The last
> time I checked that URL I got a DATA ERROR message or some sort.
Here is the page location.
http://www.oo-xx.com/bbs/
Please test it.
Thanks. :-)
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>
> >> Just a quick note to let you all know that for the first time we are now
> >> recommending that our users consider using Mozilla with the FastMail.FM
> >> webmail/IMAP service--good work! See the recommendation here:
> >> http://www.emailaddresses.com/forum/show
Pascal Chevrel wrote:
>
[snip]
> Could you please tell me which mozilla pages are not wtandard compliant ?
> Apart from a missing DTD on the frontpage,
Bingo. The patch has been sitting in Bugzilla for months if not years.
It's one fricken line. Yet there it sits.
35 matches
Mail list logo