David Gerard wrote:
> COMMIES! COMMIES EVERYWHERE!
Nyet. My komrades are not everywhere. Soon though.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://www.mozillanews.org ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you wa
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:10:38 -0600,
dman84 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:its got a few bugs, with SSL, crashes, some other stuff.. hopefully
:developers will get this fixed, as then we can move on to resent
:problems on the trunk, and 0.9.9 stuff.
Here's my Favourite Mozilla Bug So Far:
ht
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Gerard wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:48:12 -0500,
> jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>:Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
>:> What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
>:> http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
>:> Would like to use i
Dont know if this is related, but there is a such a Yahoo political
problem than a Mozilla problem.. they have an issue with using Moz.
There is a bug in bugzilla about it.
Holden Caulfield wrote:
> XPAT search in what seemed like the four most relevant Mozilla
> groups turned up nothing, so..
its got a few bugs, with SSL, crashes, some other stuff.. hopefully
developers will get this fixed, as then we can move on to resent
problems on the trunk, and 0.9.9 stuff.
-dman84
David Gerard wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 23:50:27 -0500,
> grayrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :Yeh You-Ying w
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 23:50:27 -0500,
grayrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Yeh You-Ying wrote:
:> I just downlaod and install the latest release.
:> I found it's Mozilla 0.9.8+...But I never saw the announcement recently.
:> I would like to know when the 0.9.8 release...
:0.9.8 branched last week
Yeh You-Ying wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just downlaod and install the latest release.
> I found it's Mozilla 0.9.8+...But I never saw the announcement recently.
>
> I would like to know when the 0.9.8 release...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
0.9.8 branched last week, that's why the trunk is 0.9.8+. Nobody s
Holden Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Jan 2002:
> W98SE, Winsock2. I see the two checkboxes for 4 and 5 in
> Preferences, default 5. I wasn't *aware* of anything past 2; have I
> really missed three releases without having any of my so
Hello,
I just downlaod and install the latest release.
I found it's Mozilla 0.9.8+...But I never saw the announcement recently.
I would like to know when the 0.9.8 release...
Thanks a lot.
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:48:12 -0500,
jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
:> What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
:> http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
:> Would like to use it for some Moz-related stuff I'm working on.
:It's called Rev
jesus X wrote:
>
> Sören Kuklau wrote:
> >
> > What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
> >
> > http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
> >
> > Would like to use it for some Moz-related stuff I'm working on.
>
> It's called Revolution.
>
As in 1917. Oh, but tha
Free Merchant Account
Set-up Within 48 Hrs
Zero $$$ Down
Guaranteed Approval!!!
$100,000.00 Processing First Month
Bad Credit, No Credit, No Problem
Click Below For More Information
http://64.118.7.13/merchant/index.html?ID=MERCH1125
Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express
XPAT search in what seemed like the four most relevant Mozilla
groups turned up nothing, so...
Old NS user, defected to Opera a while back, trying out Moz 0.9.7
just to see what's new. When I try to log into Yahoo, on submission
of usr/pwd, I get an "Unknown socket type. Loading aborted" erro
I was looking for an interface that I could invoke through Javascript
equivalent to nsIFilePicker except that it is a dialogue that chooses
directories. Perhaps a simpler question would be is there anywhere in
Mozilla where you can choose a directory and the value of that dialogue
populates a tex
David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.kibo.com/kibopost/happyweb/
>
Sounds good, let's get hyatt to implement a user-pref for it, some might
be sad when surfing.
grayrest
I moved the entire contents of the inbox by highlighting it. Probably when I did
this I deleted everything, which is what you suggested as one possibility. I looked
at the file and sure enough, all the Status words were 8009. I simply used the
"gres" command (grep and substitute) and replaced e
Dan Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> So, in order to reconcile the need to provide accurate statistics,
> hoping to encourage more sites to become multi-browser accessible, with
> the practical need to gain access to those sites now, is there any hope
>
Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
> What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
>
> http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
>
> Would like to use it for some Moz-related stuff I'm working on.
It's called Revolution.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and
January 27, 2002
You won't believeyour eyes!
Hear your fantasiescome alive
Instant access to hotamateur webcam action
Want to get lucky???Play with them!!!48 Puzzle Pieces
Photos
http://www.kibo.com/kibopost/happyweb/
--
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/
"burger king apple fritters taste like c*nt." (siani evans)
Sören Kuklau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Expected behavior?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Why?
>
> Because most Windows applications do it like that.
This sort of argument always leads me to the standard mother's
rejoinder:
"If all your friends were jumping off a cli
Max Bentz wrote:
> Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
>
>> be helpful to a particular user at a particular time, to get into
>> sites with particularly clueless webmasters that block users based on
>> the user agent, but the use of such things is harmful to the Web
>> community as a whole, by leading to
Magnus W wrote:
> "Daniel R. Tobias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
>>JTK wrote:
>>
>>>For once Blake's right[1]: tabs are an almost-completely unused
>>>feature.
>>>
>>I use tabs in Mozilla all the time... it's a great feature. It lets
>>me op
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
> I just noticed that Optimoz causes Mozilla to slow considerably,
> especially opening new windows, is there any solution for this, because
> that is _very_ annoying when opening new window takes ~4 seconds and
> totally freezes Moz.
>
> Btw, is there coming any new v
"Daniel R. Tobias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> JTK wrote:
>> For once Blake's right[1]: tabs are an almost-completely unused
>> feature.
>
> I use tabs in Mozilla all the time... it's a great feature. It lets
> me open up and switch between seve
Mike Koenecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Jan 2002:
> What are you running, 640 x 480? Many people, myself included, really
> like the tabs feature as it simply organizes browser windows better.
>
What I do is something like this: The other day I was reading my
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> be helpful to a particular user at a particular time, to get into sites with
> particularly clueless webmasters that block users based on the user
> agent, but the use of such things is harmful to the Web community as a
> whole, by leading to access statistics that sh
Do you think it's worth me writing a bug on this matter?
JR
Travis Crump wrote:
>
>
> James Russell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> * When I have altered Mozilla code and need to restart Mozilla to see
>> the difference (i.e. when creating a theme).
>>
> In Mozilla, there is a Preference in Debug->Networ
victor levadi wrote:
> Parish,
>
> You were RIGHT ON
>
> Many thanks for the education, and thanks for taking the time.
>
You are welcome. Glad to be of help, but what exactly was the problem?
> v
>
> Parish wrote:
>
>> victor levadi wrote:
>> > The first thing that I tried was deleting
Christopher,
My apologies to you and the Newgroup for my naivete. Thank you for the
information. And thanks to those who took the trouble to help me out of
this difficult spot. One gres command was all it took to clear it up.
v
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that victor levad
Parish,
You were RIGHT ON
Many thanks for the education, and thanks for taking the time.
v
Parish wrote:
> victor levadi wrote:
> > The first thing that I tried was deleting the inbox.snm file. In the past,
> > Netscape would regenerate the file. Today the program reads the inbox file,
>
I know that itis is plain text, and I can read everything. The info you gave me
about the status code is the kind of info I need. I will look for what you said.
If you know of any other source for mor of such forat info, I would be grateful.
Thanks,
vic
Parish wrote:
> victor levadi wrote:
>
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> Travis Crump wrote:
>
>>grayrest wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It probably happened in the installation process, I know that mozilla
>>>doesn't do that when it installs, but anyway. (assuming you're in windows)
>>>
>>Mozilla probably did take it during installation and it s
Travis Crump wrote:
>
> grayrest wrote:
>
> > It probably happened in the installation process, I know that mozilla
> > doesn't do that when it installs, but anyway. (assuming you're in windows)
>
> Mozilla probably did take it during installation and it should in my
> opinion. In my experien
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
>>> Does Mozilla add the word "Mozilla" to file type descriptions? I never
>>> noticed that. I think you should file a bug.
>>
>> You mean stuff like "Mozilla Portable Network Graphic Image" for .png?
>> Yes, it doe
I just noticed that Optimoz causes Mozilla to slow considerably,
especially opening new windows, is there any solution for this, because
that is _very_ annoying when opening new window takes ~4 seconds and
totally freezes Moz.
Btw, is there coming any new version of Optimoz? 0.3.1 has been the
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Sören Kuklau wrote:
>
>>> Does Mozilla add the word "Mozilla" to file type descriptions? I
>>> never noticed that. I think you should file a bug.
>>
>>
>> You mean stuff like "Mozilla Portable Network Graphic Image" for .png?
>> Yes, it does that for everything it's reg
Sören Kuklau wrote:
>> Does Mozilla add the word "Mozilla" to file type descriptions? I never
>> noticed that. I think you should file a bug.
>
> You mean stuff like "Mozilla Portable Network Graphic Image" for .png?
> Yes, it does that for everything it's registered with. This is expected
>
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
>
>> redefine the names of standard, nonproprietary file formats to include
>> the company or software product name in them, when displayed in the
>> Windows Explorer or various other places where the associated file
>> type for a file extension
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> redefine the names of standard, nonproprietary file formats to include
> the company or software product name in them, when displayed in the
> Windows Explorer or various other places where the associated file
> type for a file extension or MIME type is shown.
Does M
And it came to pass that victor levadi wrote:
> I have a very large mail file in 4.7,
Netscape Communicator is off topic here.
SEE:
http://ufaq.org
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Boxing is a lot like ballet,
victor levadi wrote:
> The first thing that I tried was deleting the inbox.snm file. In the past,
> Netscape would regenerate the file. Today the program reads the inbox file,
> but apparently only recognizes that one message at the end. Additional
> messages can be added at the end of that file
The first thing that I tried was deleting the inbox.snm file. In the past,
Netscape would regenerate the file. Today the program reads the inbox file,
but apparently only recognizes that one message at the end. Additional
messages can be added at the end of that file. Removing the new messages
What's that strange Mozilla logo font?
http://www.mozillanews.org/images/icons/mozdotorg.png has it, for example.
Would like to use it for some Moz-related stuff I'm working on.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>
>> I, for example, know very well that tabs exist, and don't like them.
>> (I prefer having all my windows in the taskbar).
>
>
> I prefer tabs... I don't like to clutter up my taskbar,
I do like them to clutter up the taskbar, because th
I have a very large mail file in 4.7, which Netscape has stopped
displaying. I must have been careless in moving the file. There are more
than a thousand messages in this file, and I want to be able to keep
them in the Netscape mail file system with all of the other filed
messages. I could write
I have a very large mail file in 4.7, which Netscape has stopped
displaying. I must have been careless in moving the file. There are more
than a thousand messages in this file, and I want to be able to keep
them in the Netscape mail file system with all of the other filed
messages. I could write
JTK wrote:
> No, see, I'm not the one who drew up a bunch of commie graphics,
> thinking the whole time, "heheheee look at how kewl I am! I'm sticking
> it to the Man! I don't even know what Communism is, but I do know these
> graphics will sure raise a ruckus, uhuck, uhuck! Plus, they can't bu
James Russell wrote:
>
>
> * When I have altered Mozilla code and need to restart Mozilla to see
> the difference (i.e. when creating a theme).
>
In Mozilla, there is a Preference in Debug->Networking which allows you to
disable XUL cache in which case you can futz with a theme and see the
r
49 matches
Mail list logo
