David Tenser wrote:
Ralinx wrote:
i would _really_ like to get anti-aliased fonts in moz
Now i've heard about ways to enable them in Mozilla but so far i haven't
been able to get it working. Could some of u tell me how this can be done?
btw, please don't recommend the gdkxft patch cuz i
Phil Sweeney schrieb:
Microsoft ClearType is only for LCD monitors (otherwise it is just
blurry and most likely bad for your eyes).
I have cleartype enabled on my XP. It's wonderful. Not blurry at all.
--
Holger Metzger
Netscape 6 Tips: http://www.hmetzger.de/netscape6.html
If removed Mozilla, will any of the profiles I made in Netscape 6 be
removed as well?
--
Regards, Robert Davies
My ICQ UIN is: 2905399
__
Do you Netscape?! If not, why not?
http://home.netscape.com/
Download Netscape 4 6 NOW!
If you're on DALnet visit me in
Holger Metzger wrote:
Phil Sweeney schrieb:
Microsoft ClearType is only for LCD monitors (otherwise it is just
blurry and most likely bad for your eyes).
I have cleartype enabled on my XP. It's wonderful. Not blurry at all.
Is it enabled by default? Where can one set it up explicitly?
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Is it enabled by default? Where can one set it up explicitly?
It's somewhere in display settings, in my german version display --
effects -- method smoothing fonts -- cleartype
--
Holger Metzger
Netscape 6 Tips: http://www.hmetzger.de/netscape6.html
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:37:34 -0800, Garth Almgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
Using an Athlon 1.33 gHz/384 meg of RAM/ TNT2 Nvidia video card here and
IT FLIES! ;-) ...
Yeah, I know IE and NC4.7x BOTH fly on semi-modern hardware. I was
referring to *Mozilla*.
I've
JTK wrote:
Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it
required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM.
Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a hell of a
lot *worse*
Yes, that could be the reason why they don't update the Back button.
However, many sites uses this feature to display a splash image to
welcome the visitors, and being unable to get back to that page, which
can contain other information as well, can be very annoying.
Travis Crump wrote:
Hi,
Is there a possibility to use the same profile under windows and linux?
I've been tried to do this but the linux version crash on start (0.9.8)
thx
Pascal
Pascal Rapaz wrote:
Is there a possibility to use the same profile under windows and linux?
I guess you can't. You can use the same Mail and News files but not the
settings file.
Andrea
--
Andrea Monni [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM: andreamonni
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Microsoft ClearType is only for LCD monitors (otherwise it is just
blurry and most likely bad for your eyes).
I have cleartype enabled on my XP. It's wonderful. Not blurry at all.
Is it enabled by default? Where can one set it up explicitly?
Here it is:
Phil Sweeney wrote:
David Tenser wrote:
Ralinx wrote:
i would _really_ like to get anti-aliased fonts in moz
Now i've heard about ways to enable them in Mozilla but so far i
haven't been able to get it working. Could some of u tell me how
this can be done?
btw, please don't
Doctor Unclear wrote:
Hi!
Bug 35011 ( http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35011 ) had
been scheduled to be fixed for mozilla 0.9.6, then retargeted for
0.9.7, then retargeted for 0.9.8, then retargeted to be fixed at 0.9.9
and now talks are about pushing it to Mozilla 1.1. I
CP wrote:
Ok sorry but I am new here. Where should I be redirecting my query?
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator (not 100% sure about
the newsgroup name=
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
yatsu wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
Kryptolus wrote:
Peter Stein wrote:
Just installed 0.9.8 via RPM. Unfortunately it has a serious
bug that IMHO renders it unusable: None of the pop up windows
that require text will actually allow text entry. No cursor
appears in the text field and if the
Christian Biesinger wrote:
CP wrote:
Ok sorry but I am new here. Where should I be redirecting my query?
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator (not 100% sure about
the newsgroup name
No, that's about Netscape 4.x. The Netscape 6 groups is
Pascal Rapaz wrote:
Is there a possibility to use the same profile under windows and linux?
This is bug 58647: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
David Tenser wrote:
However, many sites uses this feature to display a splash image to
welcome the visitors, and being unable to get back to that page, which
can contain other information as well, can be very annoying.
I've never seen it used for a splash screen, but often for This site
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:34:12 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
Yeah, I know IE and NC4.7x BOTH fly on semi-modern hardware. I was
referring to *Mozilla*.
Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
486
Ian Davey wrote:
JTK wrote:
Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it
required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM.
Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a
What kind of stuff does it reset?
Does it reset my mail account settings? I have about 5.
Parish wrote:
Bob Davis wrote:
I have an address group with 8 people on it. I emailed to the address
group and all 8 people got repeated 12 times. Anybody else seen this
behavior?
Yep, and so
Robert Davies wrote:
If removed Mozilla, will any of the profiles I made in Netscape 6 be
removed as well?
Uninstalling Mozilla deletes no profiles at all. (Maybe it should, but
it doesn't).
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither
Christian Biesinger schrieb:
Uninstalling Mozilla deletes no profiles at all. (Maybe it should, but
it doesn't).
No it shouldn't delete profiles. It may have an option to ask the user
(Should the personal data be removed?), but that should be it.
--
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of
It seems silly to me for a splash screen to contain useful information.
What if I load the page in the background and get to it a minute or
two later? I will never see the splash screen.
David Tenser wrote:
Yes, that could be the reason why they don't update the Back button.
However,
Doctor Unclear wrote:
Hi!
Bug 35011 ( http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35011 ) had
been scheduled to be fixed for mozilla 0.9.6, then retargeted for
0.9.7, then retargeted for 0.9.8, then retargeted to be fixed at 0.9.9
and now talks are about pushing it to Mozilla 1.1. I
Anyway, I think it should be an option. The reason why I discovered it
was because I was editing my own home page which has a splash screen. It
doesn't contain any valid info, but it would be nice for a developer to
be able to get back to the page anyway.
Travis Crump wrote:
It seems silly
That was totally uncalled for Mr Simpson. Don't act like a kid in this
newsgroup!!
David Simpson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:34:12 -0600, JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
Yeah, I know IE and NC4.7x BOTH fly on semi-modern hardware. I was
Maybe I'm a pioneer in the field of http-equiv=Refresh usage then :)
I use it on my own home page. If the user has not clicked on the splash
image after 10 seconds, it will switch to the next page automatically.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
David Tenser wrote:
However, many sites uses this
I did as suggested below. It looks very nice, but its functionality seems
limited by forgetting all input each time you terminate Mozilla. It comes
up empty each time. It appears that it does not save any data input..
Victor Probo
Christopher Whitt wrote:
An alternative to compiling
Title: TEENLIVEFUCKING.COM
NOTE: This is not SPAM! This email was sent to you because your email was entered on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, click here to unsubscribe
Ian Davey wrote:
JTK wrote:
Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it
required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM.
Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
open konsole/gnometerminal and type:
whereis mozilla
:)
I'll have to try that - will it give me all 3 instances?
I've got the default ximian install (0.9.8) at usr/bin (default), a
nightly install at usr/share/mozilla and the source build wherever it
may be
On 02/13/2002 10:59 AM, Patrick Gallagher wrote:
snip
I'll have to try that - will it give me all 3 instances?
I've got the default ximian install (0.9.8) at usr/bin (default), a
nightly install at usr/share/mozilla and the source build wherever it
may be hiding...
Try find / -name
Pratik wrote:
On 02/13/2002 10:59 AM, Patrick Gallagher wrote:
snip
I'll have to try that - will it give me all 3 instances?
I've got the default ximian install (0.9.8) at usr/bin (default), a
nightly install at usr/share/mozilla and the source build wherever it
may be hiding...
I've been using Mozilla for a week now and I was thinking of completely
switch to it starting from today. Then I discovered the lack of a
feature that I use very often: The ability to set up a message
rule/filter to forward any incoming email message to another email
address, based on
NEWSLETTER 01-2002 from MOLDPROBLEM.com
MOLD AND LEAKS ARE DISCOVERED IN NEW BUILDINGS.
Mold is showing up and causing problems in new homes/buildings with leaking
copper pipes as well as older homes/buildings with leaking galvanized
steel pipes. Our web site www.moldproblem.com has the
Ian Davey wrote:
Steven wrote:
I also just inserted
AddType .xml text/xml
No difference...:(
They're obviously not allowing individual .htaccess files in Apache, so
you'll need to contact them to get their global one fixed. The advantage
with doing that is that it'll be
Romanator wrote:
Wordstar. Now isn't that ancient. At the time, the computers and
hardware were junk and the specs were terrible.
But we still managed to do productive work with computers in those
times. There were no fancy graphics or colours, but how often
do we _really_ need that in a text
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (phinegan) wrote:
I'm consistently getting a crash from the 0.9.8 Mac installer...it
extracts the files, and then closes with a type 12 error. I've never
had a problem installing previos build, and in fact was able to
re-install 0.9.7 without
http://69chorus.ce.ro
±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼ÇÎÁß, http://www..com/ ¿¡¼ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç,
E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é
,¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
David Simpson wrote:
Win95 better than Win3.11. You'd have to be joking. The second release
did a few things better but it still crashed far more often than
Win3.0 ever did.
Win 95 was better (or less awful) than Win 3.11 in _some_ ways.
In my opinion, one of them was the user interface,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Simon Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (phinegan) wrote:
I'm consistently getting a crash from the 0.9.8 Mac installer...it
extracts the files, and then closes with a type 12 error. I've never
had a problem
Your word really, with underscores before and after, gets underlined
when reading it in Mozilla Mail. How is that accomplished and where can
I change it?
Gollum wrote:
Romanator wrote:
Wordstar. Now isn't that ancient. At the time, the computers and
hardware were junk and the specs were
Gollum wrote:
Romanator wrote:
Wordstar. Now isn't that ancient. At the time, the computers and
hardware were junk and the specs were terrible.
But we still managed to do productive work with computers in those
times. There were no fancy graphics or colours, but how often
do we
David Tenser wrote in message...
Anyway, I think it should be an option. The reason why I discovered it
was because I was editing my own home page which has a splash screen. It
doesn't contain any valid info, but it would be nice for a developer to
be able to get back to the page anyway.
David Tenser wrote in message...
Yes, that could be the reason why they don't update the Back button.
However, many sites uses this feature to display a splash image to
welcome the visitors.
Which is an absolute crock and should be drawn and quartered for it. I get
sick of getting stuck in
46 matches
Mail list logo
