On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 12:24:06 -0500, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Parish wrote:
>
>> Ian Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> Malodushnikh wrote:
>>>
I insist that you prove that this decreases Mozilla's usage.
>>>
>>> And how do you suggest I do that? Should I ask everyone who has ever
>>> been to the mozilla
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:16:48 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Chocobo_greens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9varjg$c40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9varjg$c40$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Dec 2001:
>>
>>
>> mozilla's logo doesnt help much to chnage ppls opinion
&g
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 23:12:23 -0500, jesus X wrote:
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>> They'd called open source a Virus. Calling something a virus, etc, is
>> one thing. When you compare it to something that americans had the
>> cold war over, you *really* risk setting off a major war. It would be
>> no be
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:15:58 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Chocobo_greens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9v41im$9la$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9v41im$9la$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001:
>>
>> maybe not everyone but MANY do. Far more than those who don't sim
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:14:49 -0500, CaT wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:49:25PM -0600, JTK wrote:
>> > I don't personally see anything wrong with the red star. The only
>> > reason it is a "communist icon" is because *YOU* see it as a
>> > communist icon.
>>
>> No, it's because the entire w
, but I fail to see why I should even consider the
> ghosts some excile Nepalese see, whos only contribution to this group or
> the project has been trolling. He isn't only seeing ghosts at broad
> dayligh - he's hallusinating.
really depends on what you call trolling. if disagreeing with you is
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001 06:25:44 -0500, kang wrote:
> Proposals for a New Mozilla Logo
>
> Go here to view and vote on Entries :
>
>
>http://pub51.ezboard.com/f9thamendmentdebatecommunityfrm1.showMessage?topicID=141.topic
>
>
> -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-
> ht
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 23:48:21 -0500, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> Chocobo_greens wrote:
>
>> it shows the star in contex, a year or so ago, THAT stuff was on the
>> start up screen, it is now shhrunk, and all you see are the smoking
>> chimneys behind the dino head on t
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 20:08:15 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Chocobo_greens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9uubjq$rhf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9uubjq$rhf$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08 Dec 2001:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 16:43:47 -0500, Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>>
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 16:43:47 -0500, Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that Chocobo_greens wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 08:17:37 -0500, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Fine, but then you should stop saying things like "communist s
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 16:09:02 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Chocobo_greens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9utuc0$ia4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9utuc0$ia4$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08 Dec 2001:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 15:16:23 -0500, Malodushnïkh wrote:
>>
>>>
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 16:04:26 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Chocobo_greens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> 9utp4j$1cd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9utp4j$1cd$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08 Dec 2001:
>> 1. i cant use mozilla (not nescape version but mozilla) without the
>>
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 15:16:23 -0500, Malodushnïkh wrote:
> Killing and death happen everywhere in the world irrespective of
> ideology. Ask the people of Southeast Asia how many innocent millions
> died there under American bombs.
>
right, so we shouldnt have any american images in Mozilla, i ag
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 00:28:43 -0500, DeMoN LaG wrote:
> jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07 Dec
> 2001:
>
>> Chocobo_greens wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 02:42:19 -0500, Malodushnikh wrote:
>>&
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 08:17:37 -0500, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
>
>
> Fine, but then you should stop saying things like "communist still
> murder thousands in the world under the red star".
>
> /Jonas
>
the reason i cant stop saying that is becaue of stuff like this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/eng
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 19:14:22 -0500, Malodushnikh wrote:
> If Mozilla.org acknowledges this as a problem and removes it to placate
> the far-right hard-liner political views of a few reactionary nuts, then
> I will undo everything I've ever contributed to the project.
>
when something like this
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:47:15 -0500, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Chocobo_greens wrote:
>
>> Why on earth did the developers choose such a blatantly political (and
>> many cases offensive) symbol? is their intention to offend or insult?
>> millions of people have been ki
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 02:42:19 -0500, Malodushnikh wrote:
> And the brutal repression of everything not red, white, and blue begins
> in America.
>
for your information mozilla!=USA, me!=USA,
communist still murder thousands in the world under the red star
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 07:18:35 -0500, yatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 09:34:52 +0100, Adam Sjøgren wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 02:32:03 -0500, Chocobo greens wrote:
>>
>>> that is very easy for you to say, for some of us, the red star, like
>>> mozilla's is still a symbol of death and dest
On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 01:53:28 -0500, Henrik Gemal wrote:
> Chocobo_greens wrote:
>
>>WTF is with the mozilla logo?
>>I use linux, i've used it for 3-4 years now, and I1 know NS 4.7 is not
>>the greatest browser, now that mozilla is moving towards 1, i want to
&g
WTF is with the mozilla logo?
I use linux, i've used it for 3-4 years now, and I1 know NS 4.7 is not the greatest
browser, now that mozilla is moving towards 1, i want to install it, but i really cant
stand having a red star on my desktop or on anything i own for that
matter.
Why on earth did t
21 matches
Mail list logo
