> Also on CNET's download comments, it has been mentioned by CNET people
> that Netscape champions will flood the comment board on purpose, giving
> their product 5-star ratings across the board to boost thier stature.
Microsoft have been caught several times doing the same thing. Ditto
Quake
JTK wrote:
> You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
> "percent complete in the download progress box title" fix that I posted
> a while back.
For those who want to know who really deserves the credit, three cheers
for Bill Law, who appears to have had some assistanc
jon wrote:
> It is nytimes trying to sneak past all popup blockers.
Yeah. I've had one or two others sneak by, too. This kind of thing is
always going to be an arms race...
--
gav
> There's an RFE bug out (too lazy to look up the number) about
> adding a "default" style sheet IE-style to be used when no other sheet
> is called.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64945
If you want to view the document as a tree, try the DOM Inspector.
--
gav
> 1) RFC 1945 does discribe HTTP 1.0 protocol. But makes no mention of
> the actions we are looking at. There is a great deal of 'content' that
> can fit in the HTTP protocol.
A little more searching legwork reveals that I was actually thinking of
RFC 2616, sections 14.9.1 and 2, the cache-c
Victor Probo wrote:
> I understand the implications of the browser
> storing/obscurring/encryptiong data to make the user's life easier.
> What I am asking for are pointers to the API (Application Programming
> Interface) so I know what those headers are, or how to get the PSM to
> pass p
gavin long wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>> mdakin wrote:
>>
>>> well, its obvious that he used your name to show how it feels like. Some
>>> people like it, some not.
>>
>> Some people like being criticized and/or patronized?
>
> That goes without
JTK wrote:
> mdakin wrote:
>
>>>Why do you always use my name when criticizing/patronizing me, Gavin?
>>>What would you prefer I call the guy, "pal"? "Bucko"? "Dude"? "Senor
>>>Mozillarista"?
Did I state a preference? I asked a simple question, which you haven't
answered.
>>well, its obvio
Parish wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>> gavin long wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you always use people's first names when criticising/patronising
>>> them, Gary?
>>
>> Why do you always use my name when criticizing/patronizing me, Gavin?
I'd be intrigued
Victor Probo wrote:
> Can you be a bit more specific about the definition of "disable PSM"?
> Can you point to any API documentation for this PSM capability? I have
> been surprised about private features of the PSM twice now in 2 weeks.
> One would hope that all of this would be up front, to
>>>We are testing Mozilla in our Win 32 application which run "unattended
>>>24 hours a day" and have found a memory leak. Even a few bytes leak will
>>>cause an application crash and this is not acceptable in our
>>>environment.
Much as I am fond of Moz, I doubt it's going to be able to run
una
Matthew Thomas wrote:
> gavin long wrote:
>
>>>Read here http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
>>>Interesting reading about the lack of usability in Mozilla. At least
>>>I agree with the author.
>>>
>>That's good news. MPT is the
> My initial point was that there is much effort in making Mozilla
> skinnable, with a solid API foundation to work with, but most users
> would benefit from customizable toolbars instead of skins.
I believe that "skinability" was mostly a side-effect of the development
of the cross-platform U
> Read here http://mpt.phrasewise.com/stories/storyReader$35
> Interesting reading about the lack of usability in Mozilla. At least I
> agree with the author.
That's good news. MPT is the owner of the User Interface Design
component. He's well placed to get these fixed.
--
gav
>> What OS are you using?
>
> His email did say:
>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90;...
>
> So I am guessing Windoze.
Win9x 4.9 is WinME, I believe
--
gav
David Tenser wrote:
> One thing that I've always thought of as a very simple, yet very useful
> feature that Mozilla lacks: The ability to add/remove buttons to the
> toolbar(s) and to drag/move toolbars, address fields, menus, etc.
>
> Even simple crappy Wordpad has this functionality (at leas
David Tenser wrote:
> That's what I'm trying to ask. On my Mozilla, it underlines words
> starting and ending with _underscores_ ... My question is where that is
> specified! Are there any CSS file that holds these formatting rules?
I don't know, but this page : http://www.hmetzger.de/net6e.ht
Christian Biesinger wrote:
[useful clarification and correction]
Thanks for that.
Rules of Usenet, no 94.
When you make an ill-informed post on a technical subject, someone will
correct you very quickly.
Except when they don't, of course. :)
--
gav
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>
>> [mozilla] *** Banned: Wingate proxy (2002/02/07 02.28)
>
> Well, this message means that the Wingate port is open on the computer
> you're loggin in from.
>
> If you think you shouldn't be banned, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your
>
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
> I noticed that in recent nightlies pages with an autorefresh are going
> wonky - they refresh every couple seconds regardless of how often the
> page specifies...
>
> Is there a bug on this?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116361
--
gav
> I don't know about PC/UNIX side of things but, Page size (Print) Mac is
> the responsibility of the print Driver/Chooser file for the printer.
Yup. Just had a quick poke around in win32, and the paper size was
definitely handled by the windows/print driver side, not by Moz.
--
gav
>>> Mozilla will never seriously take off with
>>> respect to market share.
>>
>> That sounds like a bullshit argument. Logically, it's utter crap. Come
>> up with something better.
>
> Are you an idiot, or just acting like one?
No, he's not. I lose count of the number of posts in newsgroups/
JTK wrote:
> Right, the same non-existent "WAA!!! I couldn't compete with
> Microsoft! I didn't even try to!" basis.
Thereby proving that he's either not read the findings of fact, or chose
not to believe them.
--
gav
Ryan wrote:
[snip rant]
> So what gives?
If you've been following MozillaZine for the last fortnight or so,
you'll know that they're busy tearing the whole site apart and
re-assembling it. I believe that this is being done in the spare time
of one person. Now, it's not a huge site, but it's
David Simpson wrote:
[snip]
A bug, whose number escapes me right now. Fixed in the recent
nightlies, and the fix should be in 0.9.8.
"Fixed" meaning it now remembers where you put stuff last time. Some
people have different definitions of "fixed", which may or may not get
implemented in the
cr wrote:
> How about this?
>
> While the dialog box is up begin saving the file to some temporary
> place. If the file system runs out of space, just "pause" the download
> at this point.
If the "temporary place" is on the same disk/partition/whatever as
whatever the system uses for ITS tempo
Vincent Nicolas wrote:
> It is nevertheless strange that MS JVM is so quicker than Sun one !
> Sun has created Java but they are not very good so develop a decent JVM...
> Please, M. Sun, do something !
Quicker? Maybe, maybe not. I have no data. However, the MS one is
_not_ a decent JVM, as
Steffen Motzer wrote:
> If I try to download anything by using the "save as" option, Mozilla
> (0.9.7) replaces the real filename (which is part of the URL) with the
> description used in the href link!
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115176
> I don't want to manually fix the filen
Erik Harris wrote:
> BTW, it might be worth noting that "your profile directory" is not located
> within the Mozilla directory structure, which is the intuitive place for
> those of us who have been using PC's for awhile. I looked around for it for
> a little while before doing a search for the
>> From a user perspective, later releases of IE4 were
>> "better" than NS4.x
>>in several ways, primarily stability.
>
> I couldn't stand IE4, which is why I went to Nestscape 4.
That's _your_ opinion. Many disagree with you. I abandoned NS4.x about
14 months ago, because Mozilla was mor
>>Microsoft has a monopoloy in several areas, but bad
>>HTML isn't one of them.
>>
>>There are millions of people out there who can do it all on
>>their own in notepad (or vi, for that matter, this is
>>OS-agnostic) without any help from Frontpage whatsoever.
>
> I am sure that there are, I just
JTK wrote:
> Water under the proverbial bridge. What's AOL I mean the Mozilla
> community doing *now* to get Mozilla more than 0.75% market share?
If you refer back to the source of that statistic, you'll find it's now
up to 0.85%. Also remember that it is nothing more than a statistic.
It
>>> I'm running build 2002010403 and I just stumbled across a cool bonus.
>>> This build allows switching chromes without restarting Mozilla.
>>> Thanks to whoever implemented this handy feature. I hope it stays in
>>> future builds.
>>
>> I noticed this cool feature too, unfortunately in my
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> gavin long wrote:
>> I can't test in any other browsers, but I suspect that this should
>> also work in other recent browsers (since it's W3C standard DOM)
>
> It is not. innerHTML has never been part of any W3C recommendation.
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> MS doesn't SELL their browser, they don't actually make
> a DIME off of it. The ONLY reason that IE has market dominance
> is because MicroSoft illegally used its monopoly power.
replace "The ONLY reason" with "One of the reasons".
From a user perspective, later
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> Every page that has failed to render properly in those posts was
> created in FrontPage, without exception.
Um, no? Microsoft has a monopoloy in several areas, but bad HTML isn't
one of them.
There are millions of people out there who can do it all on their own i
Mark Gillespie wrote:
> My webpage works fine under IE4/5, but there is some simple javascript that
> does not work (at all) under NS6.2 (havn't tried NS4.x, as I don't have it
> loaded)
>
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mark.gillespie/
>
> Basically, the 5 links in the blue bar at the top, shou
> Some sites encrypt pages after you enter the info. I"m not sure how
> they do this, but I remember noticing this when I ordered some stuff
> with BMG Music.
This can be done, IIRC, by having an insecure page[1], which POSTs data
to an HTTPS url.
[1] why bother sending the FORM over a secu
> I really HATE comments taken out of context and then criticized.
My apologies for any misinterpretation, I should have trimmed more
zealously. I was commenting only on the text immediately before mine.
Hey, it was the day after the party, I wasn't exactly on tip-top mental
form.
More appr
Steven wrote:
> In mail & News when I select a folder and choose properties I
> get a dialog window with a menu to set the character encoding.
> This menu is too long for my monitor (which is 960 pixels high)
> and won't scroll. So it is impossible to set the character encoding
> to Western... I
Dale wrote:
>Thankfully, unlike Netscape 6.x, Mozilla seems to co-exist
> nicely with Netscape 4.xx (I'm using v4.78). However, it has
> one "feature" that pretty much guarantees that I'll not fully
> switch over. Netscape, before v6.x, allowed one to save the
> text from a page simply
JTK wrote:
> But "and rising"? I don't think so - it was higher than this the last
> time I saw some stats like a year ago. Not much mind you, but higher
> than 0.75%.
Stats depend hugely upon how they are gathered. Anyone who thinks
otherwise is a fool.
Mozilla (including N6) from the "U
>>And because they lost market share becaue web designers hated
>>designing TWO versions of a page.
>
> I thought that Netscape lost market share because they released a grossly
> buggy browser (I say this as a staunch netscape user) which forced people
> away from using Netscape, combined wit
> The best part of JTK ran down his mama's thigh.
While I have no love for JTK myself, can we try to keep things civilised
in here?
> I don't know why he's allowed to post here - all he does is
> denigrate the product and the Organizations goals.
The downside of freedom of speech, unfortuna
> Nobody's posted numbers recently, I'd love to see how low the percentage
> is these days.
(source: http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/stat.htm)
In the US : 0.75% of hits, and rising.
In the UK : 1.2% of hits, and rising.
For reference, Opera has 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively.
As always, these
>> Check bug 114377, that bug relates to the crash in question.
>>
> Do the latest nightlies still have this?
It's still in 2001122803, and no sign of a fix in the bug. It's gaining
duplicates fairly rapidly, so it should get some attention soon.
--
gav
JTK wrote:
> Please stop this sub-juvenile BS.
> [...] you're sadly mistaken if you think you're doing
> anything other than making an abhorrent ass of yourself.
I could repeat that right back at you and I think most of the readers
here would agree with me. But that's contrary to the news
JTK wrote:
> Pratik wrote:
>
>>
>
> Crap huh? We back to "it's all a dream" now?
>
>>The question still stands. Did you try out what the bug suggests? Yes or
>>No?
>
> No.
You're hurling abuse at the one person in here who is trying to help
you? And not bothering to find out if what h
Mark Gillespie wrote:
> I tried both Mozilla & Netscape6.2, and can't figure out for the life of,
> why neither of these force windows to connect to my ISP.
>
> I have looked in all the settings.
Arthur has already provided details of how to do this[1], so I'm just
going to waffle a bit about
Arthur wrote:
> [...] I 've learned myself (sorry, couldn't figure out the past
> tense of To Teach)
...I've taught myself...
English isn't exactly an easy language, at the best of times. Don't
worry, you're doing much better than my dutch.
--
gav
>>No, I can d/l them. I grabbed one yesterday. I just want to clarify how
>>to install them since they don't include an installer (to be expected, I
>>know).
>
> Sure they do. Go here:
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/ and its
> "mozilla-win32-installer-sea.exe". The "-sea" is
Sierk Bornemann wrote:
> Using the nightly builds since months, I must still see, that the bug
> filed with http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41924 still isn't
> fixed. I think, this is bad, since we are at a high level stadium near
> the 'golden' 1.0 release.
That bug is far from
Simon Montagu wrote:
> Patrick Taylor Ramsey wrote:
>
>
>> Gavin Long wrote:
>>
>>> Option 1) remove yourself from he CC list of bugs that you don't
>>> care about.
[snippage]
>>
>> I think that is what I will do. I guess I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chocobo_greens wrote:
>
WTF is with the mozilla logo?
I use linux, i've used it for 3-4 years now, and I1 know NS
4.7 is not the greatest browser, now that mozilla is moving
towards 1, i want to install it, but i really cant stand
having a red st
Patrick Taylor Ramsey wrote:
> I knew that I didn't know what I was doing, but I didn't know to what
> extent that was true. When I signed up with bugzilla I just wanted to
> report a few bugs that I had encountered in a milestone build (not having
> put two and two together and realized that
>> 2. In the list boxes inside preferences (those with 2 colums), the
>> grid seperating the data cells does not match up with the header
>> cells. The column divider is offset to the left by a few pixels.
>>
> I find this annoying as well. I think the problem is that the table code
> doesn't
ZZT wrote:
> is that possible? For instance block all images that come from
> http://ad.doubleclick.net.
Yes. Once you have a page with such an image,
right-click[1] on the image->block images from this server.
[1] or whatever you do to invoke the context menu in your GUI of choice.
[follow
Geraint Edwards wrote:
[print preview]
> 2. Some CSS settings are missed (will do some more investigation).
Be aware that CSS may get handled differently depending on the media :
it is possible to define a style sheet that will give a completely
different appearance on the printed page to tha
Bernard Perrot wrote:
> Just installed mozilla 0.9.6 (linux box, RH7.1) : the fonts are not
> correct, and if I try the fonts setting in preferences menu, it refuse
> other setting than iso8859-3 ... (8 points) ??? This is completly new...
> (upgrading from 0.9.4)
IIRC, there were quite a fe
WDA wrote:
> I might be crazy but in my opinion, Mozilla Build ID: 200808, works
> better than Mozilla 0.9.6.
0.9.6 branched from the trunk on or about 9 Nov 2001. Therefore the 18
Nov trunk build can be regarded as considerably "newer" than 0.9.6
--
gav
Scott Tran wrote:
> Marc Schirrmacher wrote:
>> But where are the differences between /latest /latest-trunk and
>> /latest-statictrunk?
>> Whouh! This FTP seems to be like BugZilla: *Not for Newbies* (like me ;)
>
> I dunno what statictrunk is but the latest-statictrunk, would contain
> the lat
flacco wrote:
>>> does anyone know how to increase the size of the fonts used for menus
>>> and dialogs used by mozilla?
>
> If you're using GNOME desktop on Linux, I believe changes made to fonts
> in your GTK themes also propagate to Mozilla.
Similarly, Moz follows your desktop settings in
>>>I thought print preview was part of the print Driver.
>>
>>There is no resemblence to what you describe, and what mozilla does with
>>Print Preview on Windows. There is no printer dialog involved at all.
>
> There is no print Preview through the Print Command on Windows? Hmmm.
Nope. On
Al Rider wrote:
> Get use to it. MS has essentially "won" the law suit and will only get
> more agressive in stifling competition from now on.
[asbestos suit on]
Ahem. They had the "remedy" overturned, and the judge removed from the
case. The verdict (guilty) still stands. Arguments (lega
>> I would be interested help the Moz project but I need it to work on the
>> Borland compiler.
>
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62773
>
> Don't hold your breath :(
I spoke too soon. Having looked at the bug again, after months of
silence, there's been some activity in the las
Rob Ward wrote:
> I would be interested help the Moz project but I need it to work on the
> Borland compiler.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62773
Don't hold your breath :(
--
gav
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> It doesnt work the way its supposed to, I notice its using document.all
> Its not my site but I am good friends with the owner, can someone
> suggest how to rewrite this code to work under mozilla, I will then pass
> the info on to the site owner.
http://www.scottandre
Tom St Denis wrote:
> Can I request that an OPTION [not forced] be installed where mozilla is
> more verbose about errors and warnings? And not like MSIE which gives
> line numbers [which never correspond].
Try Tasks->tools->javascript console.
on 0.9.5 and later, try tasks->tools->javascri
Henri Sivonen wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>(my usual problem area is DOM/Javascript stuff)
>
> If you are unsure, DOM is a better guess. (Real JS engine bugs are quite
> rare.)
That's where the problem STARTS. Which DOM? That said, I usually just
do
> Why can't my mozilla 0.9.4 open the dial-up connection automatically? I
> always have to do it manually. w2k; sp2, 56k mode line.
> Any hints to set up ?
I believe you need to play with the Networking/Dial-Up Networking
settings in Windows so that it notices that a program is trying to
acces
Wim Roffel wrote:
> Consider the following a webpage:
[snip]
> In Mozilla you will see a counter going rather slowly from 1 to 1000. In IE
> you will only see the figure 1000 after a short wait.
>
> I suspect that this is major reason why Mozilla is so slow when you have
> many input fields.
N
> just check for document.all? That's how I
> would ensure an IE only site
And come a cropper when the user has a browser that partially (or better)
implements document.all. I believe Opera does so, for a start. Browser
sniffing by looking for DOM support is not at all reliable.
--
gav
> Now, if it could just get to where managing
> pop-ups and cookies was that easy, it'll easily
> overtake Microspam's Exploder!
go have a read of
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/components/configPolicy.html
and say bye-bye to pop-ups.
--
gav
Yoda McAwips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm using Mozilla under RH Linux 7.1 with XF86 4.0.2, TT fonts and
> anti-aliasing enabled. Hotmail's site looks terrible under Mozilla and
> Netscape. It looks very good in Konqueror 2.1.1.
>
> Anyo
> I have NS 6.1 PR1 and I have TONS of bookmarks. With previous versions
> of NS I could easily copy the bookmarks.html file to my home pc or
> wherever and have my links wherever I need them. I can't find any such
> file for NS 6, have they done away with it ? Are we now stuck with a
> rotten Fav
> - MailNews performance
> In .9.3 most of the very annoying bugs and crashes have finally been
> squashed in the MailNews section, but it is the slowest mail program by
> far of the major email clients for Windows. [snip]
This is being worked on. IIRC, there has been a "mail/news performance
br
> Is the new Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 preview release
> based on Mozilla 4.0? I had an error while connecting with
> IE6 to IIS on my Windows 2000 machine, and IE reported the
> browser as Mozilla 4.0 (IE 6.0 compatable), or something
> like that in the error report.
No it isn't.
Many brows
> I don't think this should be a preference. Sometimes I find myself
> wanting to open a new empty browser, Mozilla style, and sometimes
> wanting to "clone" the currently open state with all the back and
> forward history still in place, IE style. Ideally these should be two
> separate actions.
Pratik wrote...
> > I'm using Netscape 6.01 as supplied by Sun for x86 Solaris 8.
>
> Netscape 6.01 is quite outdated,. I'd sugget you grab hold of at
> least NS6.1 and see if the bug persists. Better still get the
> latest Mozilla milestone or nightly build. Pretty sure such a
> bug would have be
Andrew Dale wrote...
> Can no longer run or install Mozilla - DrWatson kicks in every time.
> Have tried all possible variants.
> 0.9.2 was working until I added a theme (I won't say which) which failed
> to install automatically on download.
>
> Have removed totally with CleanSweep, run RegEdit a
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote...
> Supposedly they are logged at a special server. And each and everyone
> (every minute detail) is gone over with a fine tooth comb.
The Talkback reports can definitely lead to bugzilla logs, and influence
which bugs get marked "topcrash"
I suspect that all the
Thomas wrote...
> Jerry Park wrote:
> > Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> shouldn't the result after adding 0.03 to 0.27 be 0.3 ???
> >
> > No. Floating point arithmetic doesn't work that way. A fraction which
> > may be finite in one base may be a 'repeating decimal' in another
base.
> > Conversion from bas
--
gav
Playing: Deus Ex; TFC1.5; Just Read: The League Of Extraordinary
Gentlemen, Alan Moore et al.; Guilty Pleasures, Laurell Hamilton;
A Good Old-Fashioned Future, Bruce Sterling;
> > Now returning you to our scheduled holy war on HTML vs. plain text
> > posting.
> >
> > Those of you wanting to join in our regular holy war re: top vs.
bottom
> > quoting should see the thread "Mozilla should put the Signature
ABOVE..."
> > elsewhere in this group.
>
>
> LOL, let's also start
[reply posted to n.p.m.general only - watch the crossposting, people]
> > And even in the rest of the world, many folks pay:
> > by the minute for the phone connection
> > By the minute for the INTERNET connection
> > and by the kilobyte for the download.
> >
> > Adding a flowered background or s
> > All I want is for looping animations to not loop...
>
> In Mozilla, the latest nightlies at least:
>
> Edit->Preferences->Privacy and Security->Images->
> "Animated images should loop:"
FYI, it's in 0.9.2, as well.
--
gav
Playing: OPFor; TFC1.5; Tachyon: The Fringe; Now Reading: A Good Old-
Greg Miller wrote :
> D. Alvarado wrote:
>
> > I was just wondering if Code Warrior for Windows can be
> > used instead of Visual C++ for developing Mozilla on a Win32
> > platform. If possible, what complications does this add to
> > buidling the code?
>
> Don't have a bug number, but I rec
jesus X wrote
> JTK wrote:
> > Carlfish wrote:
> > > HTH, HAND, *plonk*
> > Anyway, didn't you "*plonk*" me already Charlie?
>
> When people reply to you, that's a good sign you haven't been
plonked yet.
This particular troll has changed his (faked) e-mail address more than
once, presumably _beca
Andie wrote:
> Jay Garcia wrote:
[mass snippage]
>
> > Anyways, THE caretaker of the machine was away for a few days and
> > returned today. When he reads my email I'm sure the server will be
back
> > online asap.
>
> Port 563 is still not responding as of now.
Jay's message was posted at approx
Pratik Solanki wrote
> DeMoN_LaG wrote:
>
>
> > MS will not release IE for any other OS.
>
> MS has an IE 5 version that runs on Solaris and HP-UX.
Many of the documentation pages don't appear to have been updated
since 1999. Call me a cynic, but it looks like a token effort to
appease the cri
[Apologies for second-gen reply, but the troll is kill-filed. JTK,
apologies in advance if this is mis-attributed but, somehow, I doubt
that it is]
> JTK wrote:
>
> > I guess last month, according to another respondent to your
> > anti-MS religious rantings.
LOL. JTK accusing people of "anti-X
[English version below/Englische Version unter]
(traurig, spreche ich Deutsches nicht, so Übersetzung durch
babelfish.altavista.com),
> if (document.layers) {
>obj.visibility = "show";
> }
>
> if (document.all) {
> obj.style.visibility = "visible";
> }
Dieses arbeitet nicht in Mozilla, ve
Gene Voelker wrote :
> Oddly enough, this sort of post has frequented warbirds newsgroups.
In
> reference to the swastikas on german planes.
>
> It has been pointed out that polish planes used a swastika with a
blue tone.
[snip]
> In any case, several things are obvious:
>
> 1-Swastikas
David Hallowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ken wrote:
>
> > alt-o actually, in X Windows. This button makes like a lot easer
for
> > copying and pasting in X.
>
> You're thinking of Netscape 4.x not mozilla which is what the group
is
> abou
(original post was cross-posted all over the show, I'm replying in
N.P.General and N.P.M.General only)
Guy Shurmer wrote
> I too have a problem trying to find info / newsgroups on Netscape 6,
so
> tried the site Ashant recommended.
>
> You sure you got the right URL?
> > Check out www.scotandrew
> > In the roadmap it's said 0.8.1 release is scheduled to be on March
19.
> > Since that date is already passed, what's the new program?
>
> I believe it's here:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.8.1/
> The files were updated on March 19th...
I believe those are 0.8.1 CANDIDAT
> In the roadmap it's said 0.8.1 release is scheduled to be on March
19.
> Since that date is already passed, what's the new program?
Thinking back to the 0.8 release , the "release" date is a bit of a
best-case-scenario.
The usual schedule for a milestone release is :
1) Wednesday : Freeze th
Michael Wardle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
93lkme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93lkme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why does Mozilla use so much memory?
Because, until quite recently, the main priority was getting
everything working. Optimising (for speed or memory) was regarded as
less important t
Randall Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Is M18 from an earlier or later source code base?
Earlier.
> Can one install M18 or a nightly build on a machine that has NS6 and
have
> them coexist?
Yes.
--
gav
Playing: TF 1.5 for Half-Life;
99 matches
Mail list logo
