Re: MozBlog

2002-03-23 Thread Mike Lee
out of date, but you don't miss much from it (concept wise anyway). Feel free to ask any further question address to me personally or mozblog newsgroup, just not here :) [1] http://mozblog.mozdev.org/documentation.html -- Mike Lee Weblog: http://www.exitspace.net/mike

Re: How big is Mozilla now?

2002-03-22 Thread Mike Cramer
Colin Blake wrote: Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL, JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now? devo:mozilla 262: find mozilla \( -name \*.xul -o -name \*.js -o -name \*.cpp -o -name \*.h \) | xargs -n 50 wc -l | fgrep total | awk '{print $1}' | add 2824938

Re: Repeat after me....(another tirade on Mozilla cookie handling)

2002-03-17 Thread Mike Gratton
are far less ignorant that a) you think and b) you are coming across as right now. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://web.vee.net/ Every motive escalate.

New Server Traffic?

2002-03-17 Thread Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM)
What's going on? The news server seemed to eat about 4-6 days of posts and then most everyone else has vanished from the newsgroups Mike == Forget the Joneses I can't keep up with The Simpsons!

Re: Who is the user?

2002-03-15 Thread Mike Shaver
to support XUL any time soon. Mike

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

2002-03-15 Thread Mike Gratton
own drawbacks. What if Moz crashes when it's trying to print something? Hmm? -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://web.vee.net/ Every motive escalate.

Can't we get some decent trolls around here anymore? [was: Netscapesnooping on search terms from Netscape6]

2002-03-08 Thread Mike Gratton
already far, far behind. Mike. (-1, Troll) -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://web.vee.net/ Every motive escalate.

Nutscrape 6 Spyware???

2002-03-08 Thread Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM)
Glad Moz doesn't do this: http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/175035.html

Re: A Real Full Screen Mode

2002-03-02 Thread Mike Lee
Lancer wrote: Un Vrai Mode De Plein Écran Un Real Modo Pantalla Completa http://www.geocities.com/charadew/exsertus/mozilla_eagle_eye.html Think we got the point with the first post ;) Good idea, might want to file a rfe bug. -- Mike Lee http://www.exitspace.net/mike

Re: linux java plugin

2002-03-02 Thread Mike Gratton
in $JAVA_HOME/plugin/i386/ns600 or $JAVA_HOME/jre/plugin/i386/ns600. HTH Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://web.vee.net/ Every motive escalate.

Re: Speed and size

2002-02-14 Thread Mike Cramer
the whole word. Sort of like putting *asterisks* around a word makes it bold. --Mike

Re: How do you sync PalmPilot with Netscape 6.2.1 mail?

2002-02-14 Thread Mike Hatz (Remove the SPAM)
for Netscape 4.79 which means that I need to check it manually from time to time, if I want to send e-mail from my palm pilot. The whole solution is VERY lame, but it does work. :-( Mike

The Netscape 4.7x Calendar program

2002-02-12 Thread Mike Garcia
to become a relic??? Sorry if there is something obvious I a missing with the questions. Thanks, Mike

Are You Done Working? Is it Time to Get the Reward?

2002-02-10 Thread Mike Levell
WOW THIS REALLY WORKS!!! Dear Friend Future Millionaire: Making over half a million dollars every 4-5 months from your home for an investment of only $25 U.S. Dollars expense one time. THANKS TO THE COMPUTER AGE AND THE INTERNET!! BE A

Re: anyone ever considered porting mozilla to the Common Language Runtime?

2002-02-09 Thread Mike Gratton
allow you to use standard libraries and similar non-language facilities, relegating the usefulness of the cross-language capability to that of a nifty toy - nice to play with, but not something you want to use for any real software project. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive

Re: onmousewheel=

2002-02-08 Thread Mike Gratton
by the DOM level 2 REC. Had MS followed this, then they would have had a relatively clean implementation. Any HTML style onfoo= event handler are at best, a hack. More object-oriented event handling WOULD be nice, though. See above. How much more OO do you need DOM2 events to be? -- Mike Gratton

Re: Question about how Mozilla downloads objects

2002-02-07 Thread Mike Garcia
Ralf Keimer wrote: Mike Garcia wrote: Just wondering if anyone might know, I was tracing the objects coming down when browsing with Netscape. I changed my prefs so that Memory and Disk cache were turned off. When I did this I noticed that if the web page had a gif for example

Question about how Mozilla downloads objects

2002-02-06 Thread Mike Garcia
would download it each and every time. However testing this on IE with the same situation, it downloads it only once. Does anyone have any ideas on why this is happening that way. It seems inefficient but than again there may be a good reason for it. Thanks, Mike

new email - no email!!

2002-01-29 Thread Mike Greene
Netscape 6 is saying that I have unread emails - but I cannot see them! I have now deleted the contents of my in box but the message remains! HELP Please Mike

Re: Tab feature improvement suggestions

2002-01-26 Thread Mike Lee
Randall Parker wrote: On 27 Jan 2002 05:29:48 GMT esteemed DeMoN LaG did hold forth thusly: 1) A qualified click (eg Ctrl-Shift-Click is what Opera uses) that will open a new URL in a new tab and NOT give that new tab focus. Edit, Preferences, Navigator, Tabbed Browsing, Load links in

Re: Regarding favicons...

2002-01-25 Thread Mike Koenecke
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike Koenecke wrote: Somewhat off-topic, but after the brouhaha about favicon.ico, I thought I'd try to add one to my Web site. As you can see, I do not pretend to have any expertise in HTML, but tried to add a link

Re: Netscape Sues Microsoft

2002-01-23 Thread Mike Koenecke
who just couldn't keep his trap shut. Jackson's comments were the basis of the appeals court's overturning his ordered remedies. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: XML not rendered

2002-01-19 Thread Mike Gratton
. 8) -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: Text widget performance

2002-01-18 Thread Mike Gratton
carries a more up-to-date version of Moz, perhaps you could try that out. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: it's baaack: 0.9.7 - waiting for mouse to move

2002-01-18 Thread Mike Gratton
mouse over something significant, again, usually some chrome. Very annoying. Couldn't find a bug for it, so I've filed: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120877, you probably want to add some comments describing your symptoms to the bug. Linux/0.9.7+ Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL

Re: Why don't many links work?

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Gratton
Preferences Advanced Scripts and Windows Open Windows by themselves If it is, try checking it and seeing if these JS menus now work for you. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: Is Mozilla red Communist?

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Gratton
Travis Crump wrote: Then again, people like Debian distribute the milestones virtually unchanged except for taking out the debug menus and changing the installation method... Yep, but Debian isn't for end users either, thank God! 8) -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate

Re: Would a Less-zilla be faster ?

2002-01-15 Thread Mike Gratton
applications and games have scripting languages built into them. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: DOM inspector?

2002-01-14 Thread Mike Gratton
logging into your JS code, and not have to use alert() to do so. No more dismissing 100's of alerts as you roll over various elements on your page. Thanks for your help, Mike. I may figure out how to use these tools yet. No problem. 8) Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive

Re: How to write hello world to javascript console?

2002-01-14 Thread Mike Gratton
param to dump() is written to (AFAIK) stdout, or stderr. Under Linux, that'll be to the term in which you started it or to ~/.gnome-errors or ~/.xsession-errors or similar. HTH, Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: Style-sheets no longer working with 0.9.7

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Gratton
Markus Brueckner wrote: Also it shouldn't work with the relative paths either. I assume that'S not the source of his problems. Really? Relative to what? Is it just the path which should be absolute, or the entire href URL? OOC, which REC is that specified in? Mike. -- Mike Gratton

Re: n.p.m.general - netscape.public.mozilla.general

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Gratton
when referring to the group they are posting to, or to a closely related group, as a convenience. There's no real need to type in the whole name when you have that sort of context, and I think you have a similar amount of context in the folder pane. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Selectively preventing Java startup

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Gratton
Olaf Titz wrote: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78158 (the latter is resolved invalid for reasons of don't understand what this is about, should we re-open it?) I think so, it is valid, event if it wasn't fully understood by the assignee. Want to clue them in? -- Mike

Re: DOM inspector?

2002-01-11 Thread Mike Gratton
, the source is there, there's no reason why you couldn't help inprove it. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: How's 1.0 look?

2002-01-11 Thread Mike Koenecke
let's go on bashing Mozilla! Is there any other reason JTK ever posts anything? If he has ever said anything constructive, it has entirely escaped me. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Automatic favicon.ico requests

2002-01-10 Thread Mike Cramer
. Not random files. A completely, 100%, entirely predictable file. And for a useful precedent: robots.txt The rhetoric on this thread is crazy. -- Mike

Re: Automatic favicon.ico requests

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Koenecke
; but this is a feature I think has some value. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Dom inspector weight?

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Cramer
: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/cascade.html#specificity --Mike

Re: Automatic favicon.ico requests

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Koenecke
working, so now I'm waiting for my DSL equipment to be delivered and activated. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Automatic favicon.ico requests

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Koenecke
. Given the choice between too many options and not enough options, I'll go with too many every time. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Automatic favicon.ico requests

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Koenecke
toolbar for quick U-A changes: http://www.illsley.org/useragent/) Yes, I've seen that. Trouble is, it doesn't make much difference; MBNA bounces me no matter what I put in the User Agent string. Wish I could figure that one out. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol

Re: is there a good client for AIM that also does ICQ?

2002-01-08 Thread Mike Gratton
(and briefly used) a Jammber sidebar panel. IIRCD, it is being developed over at MozDev http://jabberzilla.mozdev.org/. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: is there a good client for AIM that also does ICQ?

2002-01-08 Thread Mike Koenecke
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am after something that will be easy for an ICQ user to migrate to (needs to work with all the good features of ICQ) but that can also do AIM. Does such a program exist? Trillian will do AIM, ICQ, MSN, and Yahoo, I

Re: Simple question

2002-01-07 Thread Mike Gratton
installed several builds since that time I've run into the same problem again with Java applets, should I repeat that step for each build? Probably, yes. I guess it depends on what the advice given was. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http

Re: Problem with personal toolbar + small window width in latest builds

2002-01-06 Thread Mike H.
nightlies as well. Don't have any more info on it however. -- Mike H. To email from NG, remove -SpamIsBad- .invalid, if present.

Re: Moz 0.97 (and 0.95) - Java support?

2002-01-05 Thread Mike Gratton
. If you have end-user problems such as the one you have, then get a copy of a Mozilla-based end-user browser, such as Netscape6. Then if it doen't work for you, talk your vendor about it. Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: pages loaded only after multiple clicks

2002-01-05 Thread Mike Gratton
it was a problem in 0.9.7, so maybe you shoud upgrade? Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate. Blatant self-promotion: http://web.vee.net/

Re: DOM inspector?

2002-01-05 Thread Mike Gratton
you to is *the* DOM. It's the standard. MS has their own for IE, which is vaugely similar to the W3C DOM. NS has their own in NS4, which is a lot less similar to the W3C DOM. However, luckily for us Mozilla uses the W3C's DOM. HTH, Mike. -- Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every motive escalate

inconsistent favicons

2002-01-03 Thread mike g
the back button and when the page reloaded the default icon was no longer appearing. Seems to be missing from www.hawthornecu.org as well. Anyone else notice this? Mike

Re: Favicons gone?

2002-01-01 Thread Mike Koenecke
will call the page along with its favicon. Is this a known bug? (Platform is Linux on Intel). Same thing happens to me on Windows 2000 Pro. -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Appearing as MSIE 5.2

2001-12-19 Thread Mike
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], WDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, what I am trying to do is pick up my email from work at home. Now it sounds easy but..The Intranet at work uses Microsoft Outlook Web Access Version 5.5 SP4. Currently, when I go to their web page and log in,

Re: Nice cache management

2001-12-13 Thread Mike Koenecke
en using Mozilla full time since ~.8, and on and off since M16. Amazing that you seem to have all these problems and yet I've never seen many of them at all Actually, I saw this behavior in, I think, 0.7 or so, where the Top Five site particularly wouldn't update. But I haven't seen it since.

Java Plugin Error Message

2001-12-11 Thread Mike Koenecke
it to work. I have disabled the browser spoofing line (not that it worked, anyway), but still have this problem. Anyone else seen this? -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Mozilla logo

2001-12-09 Thread Mike Geiger
code that falls under the various licenses... why can't a few images icons? (This isn't a hostile question, I'd honestly like to know why this is such a big deal that doesn't apply to the code.) Also - how do other open source projects to it? The Apache Feather? BSD Daemon.? Mike

Positioning absolute elements

2001-12-08 Thread Mike Mimic
Hi! I have a table which I want to position. And my problem is that for x coordinates I have to substract 142 px for correct positioning (so if I position it at 0 px Netscape6 positions it at 142 px). Is this normal behaviour? Mike

Re: Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Stockman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Malodushnïkh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is your CSS file being served with the right MIME type? Don't know... the server's operated by Apple, so I can't see its configuration. Is there a way I can see this from the client side?

Re: Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Stockman
(although possibly against spec) in 0.96, but is broken (or fixed re: spec) in recent builds, is that a problem or a solution? Thanks, Mike

Re: Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Stockman
type instead of XHTML 1.0. With HTML 4, it works, and with XHTML it fails: http://homepage.mac.com/mstockman/csstest.html The question is, do I re-open the bug previously mentioned, enter a new bug, or is *this* according to design? Thanks, Mike

Re: Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Cramer
Mike Stockman wrote: The whole reason I posted here is *because* Mozilla appeared to be a quirky browser. ;-) Look at it from my point of view: I was extremely careful to create a document that matched all of the W3's standards for XHTML and CSS, the documents looked beautiful in all

Help / Discussion on key bindings

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Cannon
Hi, Is there a discussion group I can check out for info on key bindings in Mozilla? E.g., I've modified /usr/lib/mozilla/res/builtin/htmlBindings.xml and sometimes it does what I expect -- sometimes not. Thanks, Mike

Re: Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-07 Thread Mike Stockman
for users, so I have to figure they'll read the message and maybe pass it along to someone who can fix it. It still seems strange to me that Mozilla couldn't be a little more forgiving, but I guess that's rock-solid, zero-tolerance standards for you... Mike

Style Sheet (CSS) not loading on *some* servers?

2001-12-06 Thread Mike Stockman
browsers (Netscape 4.x, Opera, IE on Mac and Windows) load the HTML 4 *and* the XHTML documents fine, and the style sheets load normally. This appears, to my untrained eye, to be a three-way conflict between XHTML, Netscape-Enterprise, and Mozilla. But whose bug is it? Thanks, Mike

Bugzilla Profile Question

2001-12-02 Thread Mike Koenecke
change my user name? Should I just cancel that account and create a new one instead? -- Mike Koenecke send responses to mkoenecke (at symbol) alum.haverford.edu

Re: Flash and XMMS?

2001-11-28 Thread Mike Cramer
one thing can play at a time. Check out the Linux Audio How-to -- it should be able to give you more information. --Mike

Re: New Features Wanted

2001-11-27 Thread Mike Geiger
Time to file an RFE? :) Actually - that would be awesome. Myke DeMoN LaG wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Subject: Re: New Features Wanted From: DeMoN LaG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 28

Re: favicon

2001-11-26 Thread Mike Cramer
amazing how much anger this feature is generating. Particularly since it amounts to giving content providers *MORE* control over the presentation of their content than HTML allows directly without breaking HTML, HTTP, or anything else. --Mike

Re: favicon

2001-11-26 Thread Mike Cramer
Jonas Jørgensen wrote: Wrong. Getting *MORE* control with link rel=icon/ doesn't break HTML, HTTP, or anything else. Not wrong, just also correct. Neither favicon.ico and link rel=icon are wrong and both have advantages. But only one suffers from the invented-by-Microsoft syndrome. --Mike

Re: favicon

2001-11-26 Thread Mike Cramer
a bitch session where the *REAL* targets are Internet Explorer and whoever enabled the favicon.ico feature in recent Mozilla builds. --Mike

Re: mozilla.org releases Mozilla 0.9.6

2001-11-20 Thread Mike Blackford
Asa Dotzler wrote: On October 20, 2001 mozilla.org made available for download binaries of ^^^ November, actually (aka today) ;-) the Mozilla 0.9.6 Milestone. The builds and release notes are available at http://www.mozilla.org/releases/. New to this milestone are fixes for

Opacity

2001-11-19 Thread Mike Mimic
% opacity) doesn't make text normal. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? Sorry if this is off-topic, but I haven't found any other (more) proper newsgroup. Mike

Re: Opacity

2001-11-19 Thread Mike Mimic
Hi! perhaps setting the opacity in each cell background would produce the desired effect. I have tryed and set the style of the td to the -moz-opacity:100%, but there wasn't any change. Mike

Re: Opacity

2001-11-19 Thread Mike Mimic
. I have just set the normal table's opacity. If this is what you thought. I tryed enclosing whole text into div with opacity set to 100% but there wasn't any change. Mike

Re: Moz mail

2001-11-18 Thread Mike Geiger
Can you explain what's so difficult? I personally find the other way, LookOut is a pain to setup, whereas Mozilla is pretty easy. (though I'd rather have a single dialog to plug everything in instead of a Wizard) alpha wrote: I'll think that mozilla mail is extremly difficult to setup,

Re: favicon

2001-11-16 Thread Mike Cramer
. I guess that depends on how you define 'wrong'. Obviously the 'wrongness' of this way of doing things is not universally accepted. --Mike

Re: Plugins?

2001-11-16 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:28:41 -0500, Haydn [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: Mike Koenecke wrote: There are two things that I *still* have to use the hated IE for: (1) Accessing certain secure sites, like MBNA's, which do not accept Mozilla for some reason, and (2) Accessing

Re: favicon

2001-11-16 Thread Mike Cramer
a user had a specific pref enabled? I'd prefer to be able to simply kick out people who have this misfeature enabled. This thread is idiotic. --Mike

Re: favicon

2001-11-15 Thread Mike Cramer
page. Plus a 2K icon downloaded once per user. That's 60K for the HTML plus 60K for all the icon downloads. 120K. And that's not counting the request overhead. Sure looks like the favicon.ico is much more bandwidth friendly. --Mike

Re: favicon

2001-11-15 Thread Mike Cramer
of anything uses either of those header fields. So when it comes down to it, there are tons of ways to waste bandwidth. favicons.ico is one way, but it is by no means the biggest. It's really much ado about nothing. --Mike

Re: A way to force a complete reload?

2001-11-14 Thread Mike Geiger
okay, so what's the different betwen that and a normal reload? jesus X wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Mike Geiger wrote: Not exactly an HTTP guru, but what's the difference here? I understand theShifting is a " Mega " reload, but what does it do at the server level?

Re: A way to force a complete reload?

2001-11-13 Thread Mike Geiger
Rob wrote: On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:52:40 +0200, Ere Maijala [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Rob wrote: On 12 Nov 2001 04:24:42 GMT, DeMoN LaG n@a wrote: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote innews:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11 Nov 2001: In Netscape 4.x,

Re: tab icons

2001-11-12 Thread Mike Koenecke
I already found the pref to disable that favicon stuff, so the icon is always the same. It's pretty useless now, so I'd just as soon do away with it altogether and see more of the page title. -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere to home

Re: question about mailto:

2001-11-09 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:30:23 +0800, madog [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] starts oe, how can i change it to mozilla mail ? thanks Wow; that's interesting. I can't get mailto: to start anything *but* Mozilla. -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere

Trying to help plug memory leaks

2001-11-09 Thread Mike G
the problems? I put my code in between comments like //my code and //end my code. Just skimmed through http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/nsCOMPtr.html . I will need to read a few times to understand it but it didn't look like this file has truly been converted to nsCOMPtr. Mike

Re: favicon

2001-11-09 Thread Mike Geiger
Try StarChoice.com I don't see anything on yahoo either. Grumpy wrote: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I like it!!! here's a few Screenshots, note that nozillafavicon.jpg is mozilla.org, and no custom icon

Re: Fark: Photoshop This Picture

2001-10-30 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Mon, 29 Oct 2001 23:37:43 -0500, Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: On 10/29/2001 10:57 PM, Mike Koenecke wrote: Interesting. You saw it correctly; the images do not show up on my machine. I'm on Windows 2000, and filed it as bug number 107489. By any chance is your

Fark: Photoshop This Picture

2001-10-29 Thread Mike Koenecke
I wonder what code causes this. If you go to http://www.fark.com (a site I really like), try a Photoshop This Picture link. Click on the Comments, where the modified pictures are posted. No pictures show up in Mozilla, but of course they do show up in Internet Explorer. Anyone know why? -- Mike

Re: Fark: Photoshop This Picture

2001-10-29 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Tue, 30 Oct 2001 03:54:15 +0100, R.K.Aa. [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: Mike Koenecke wrote: I wonder what code causes this. If you go to http://www.fark.com (a site I really like), try a Photoshop This Picture link. Click on the Comments, where the modified pictures

Re: Fark: Photoshop This Picture

2001-10-29 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Tue, 30 Oct 2001 04:43:49 +0100, R.K.Aa. [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: Jay Garcia wrote: R.K.Aa. wrote: Mike Koenecke wrote: I wonder what code causes this. If you go to http://www.fark.com (a site I really like), try a Photoshop This Picture link. Click on the Comments

Re: Headers Bug? Re: Microsoft Web Portal Denies Millions

2001-10-28 Thread Mike Geiger
From my post: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011026 Jason Fleshman wrote: Mike Geiger wrote: I don't see the link because it's buried in the headers of the the message... Mozilla Bug? Control+U shows

Headers Bug? Re: Microsoft Web Portal Denies Millions

2001-10-27 Thread Mike Geiger
Title: I don't see the link because it's buried in the headers of the the message... Mozilla Bug?Control+U shows this. Look just below the X-Accept line.Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Received: from mta305.mail.yahoo.com (mta305.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.104]) by veisa.geiger.ca

Re: browser.cache.directory

2001-10-20 Thread Mike Koenecke
); user_pref(browser.cache.disk.parent_directory, d:\\tempcache\\); (I found this bug by searching for change cache in the summary.) I doubt the directory actually has to exist, since if you delete the default one Mozilla re-creates it on startup. -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere

User Cache Directory?

2001-10-18 Thread Mike Koenecke
-- to back up 15 megs. of cache.) Anything wrong with the syntax, or does this just not work? -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere to home

Re: User Cache Directory?

2001-10-18 Thread Mike Koenecke
can also copy the whole profile directory to another drive and change your local/server directory to match in the preferences.. I know. I don't want to back up the cache; that's the point. But I do want to back up my bookmarks, prefs.js, and so on. -dman84 Mike Koenecke wrote: I had thought

Re: Best way to upgrade nightlies...

2001-10-18 Thread Mike Geiger
/mozilla-win32.zip rm -rf /vols/next/c/Program\ Files/mozilla-win32/bin/* cd /vols/next/c/Program\ Files/mozilla-win32/ /usr/bin/unzip -o -C -u /tmp/mozilla-win32.zip mv /tmp/mozilla-win32.zip /vols/local/home/downloads/network/ (/vols/next is an NFS mount to my Win2KP desktop machine) Mike (at/dot

Site that doesn't render at all in Mozilla

2001-10-02 Thread Mike Koenecke
http://www.sonystyle.com comes up entirely blank in Mozilla. Just out of curiousity, can someone tell me why? -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere to home

Re: General quality comments: Mozilla

2001-09-29 Thread Mike Koenecke
, obviously :o) Oh it's only *The* industry standard for graphics/pictures creation and editing for the printing industry, and increasingly for web graphics creation as well. Windows is *THE* industry standard consumer OS, I suppose that means it has no known bugs than? -- Mike Koenecke

Re: Javascript?

2001-09-26 Thread Mike Koenecke
On or about Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:40:37 -0700, Garth Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: Mike Koenecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Javascript was already turned on. I went ahead and turned it on for Mail and News, though I

Re: Javascript?

2001-09-26 Thread Mike Koenecke
. Naviscope had re-set itself to block all pop-up windows. Disabling this for this Web page fixed the problem. Again, my apologies. And thanks for all your work on the project in general. It is really coming along. -- Mike Koenecke to reply, change nowhere to home

Re: Javascript?

2001-09-26 Thread Mike Koenecke
Seemed like it *used* to work. Perhaps it's some of that squirrelly crap that only works in Internet Exploder? On or about Wed, 26 Sep 2001 20:49:06 -0400, Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: Your sample doesn't work even on Communicator 4.7.8 Mike Koenecke wrote

Re: Javascript?

2001-09-25 Thread Mike Koenecke
install and it replaced the all.js file, so I had to do it again. Add the following line to your Mozilla/defaults/all.js file: pref(plugin.do_JRE_Plugin_Scan,true); Mike Koenecke wrote: I've noted that Javascript is simply not working in 0.9.4, unlike earlier versions. I assume I did

  1   2   >