Pratik wrote:
On 03/21/2002 07:15 AM, michael lefevre wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], John
Thompson wrote:
Here's another display problem I'm seeing in Mozilla-0.9.9: on sites
with text flowing around images (for example http://news.bbc.co.uk ),
text will sometimes flow out
jukola wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
jukola wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
ado beith wrote:
I just downloaded mozilla 0.9.9 and installed it. But it crashes as
soon as I load the browser up
Did you get a Talkback Window, asking you to send in crash
information?
Why
Phil Sweeney wrote:
I'm guessing there's a bug on this already but I can't find it in
Bugzilla (as usual :) ..
If you go to this URL in Mozilla:
http://board.performanceforums.com/forums/attachment.php?postid=96929
You get a save as dialog, but it should just show the image (as it
Christian Biesinger wrote:
snip
It's been doing the save as thing for a few weeks now I believe.
Erm. No. The checkin for bug 41333 broke it, and that was on March 8th.
Guess that's why it works on my March 8th nightly :-)
Chris Newman wrote:
Hiya,
Mozilla is absolutely superb Anyone think that having a feature
where you can select multiple home pages would be a good idea ? I'd
like Mozilla to rotate on a new browser through a list of home pages,
eg newscom, oreillynetcom, mozillaorg, javasuncom etc etc
Pratik wrote:
ftp://users.freebsd.org.uk/pub/mark/windoze/moved.exe
Did anyone else's Mozilla crash when clicking on this link? I've been
noticing that Mozilla crashes when you click on a link to file (zip file
for ex) in an email. Does anyone else see it too? bug ids???
Pratik.
Daily builds all come with specific build numbers, MMDD##, to
identify the build being used. I've recently taken to compiling mozilla
on my linux system and notice the build # is all 0's. How does one
specify a build # when compiling? The answer is probably in the docs
somewhere, but I
Parish wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Daily builds all come with specific build numbers, MMDD##, to
identify
the build being used. I've recently taken to compiling mozilla on
my linux system and notice the build # is all 0's. How does one
specify a build # when compiling? The answer
dman84 wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Mozilla 2002012803, Win2K.
http://www.musicmatch.com/
Does not render correctly. It seems to render OK under Moz 0.9.7/linux
and 0.9.4/linux. Is this a browser sniffing problem or a Mozilla bug?
Thanks,
Tim
actually they dont look to be detecting Moz
Mozilla 2002012803, Win2K.
http://www.musicmatch.com/
Does not render correctly. It seems to render OK under Moz 0.9.7/linux
and 0.9.4/linux. Is this a browser sniffing problem or a Mozilla bug?
Thanks,
Tim
Dan Howard wrote:
In case you missed it, the attachment to the original message is a
virus, as reported in the Washington post and elsewhere
(http://www.washtech.com/news/netarch/14897-1.html).
It attacks OE and the Windows Address Book -- does that mean Mozilla is
immune? I'm not
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
snip
by anyone other than yourself, so your point and question to me is
utterly pointless...
It serves as a straw man:
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/straw.htm
Matthew Thomas wrote:
Microsoft went after the desktop OS market because that's where the
money was. And they knew that to a very large extent, the majority of
desktop customers prefer to have lots of features for little price,
rather than having usability, security, or reliability. You can
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
Albert wrote:
The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH
7.2 that says Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA! (nuisance
only) and the fact that no
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows
for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm
surprised that RedHat 7.2 says the
I use a web-based calendar called Webcal. Recently, I've run into a
cgi/perl or javascript bug which causes me to have to submit calendar
changes twice before they are accepted. I did not have this problem with
a November 23rd build under linux, but a recent linux nightly and
current Win32
Tim Wunder wrote:
...You will be presented with another dialog where you must click
Submit again.
Um, just to clarify. You should only have to click Submit once. That's
the way the November 23 linux build worked, but current builds don't.
So, having to click Submit again is the bug I'm
Mark wrote:
Suggestion for a new feature, that I suppose would become post-1.0:
The ability to define/create bookmark groups, or to be able to define
certain already existing bookmark folders in such a way so that all of
the URL's within would open on one click in individual tabs (at the
James Duberg wrote:
Mozilla is really getting good. The IMAP mail is working. The tabs are a
great new feature.
Is it possible to configure Mozilla so that when you start Navigator, it
opens up several chosen websites in separate tabs?
Greg Miller wrote:
David Hyatt wrote:
Make sure you ban Konqueror too. :)
dave
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Greg Miller wrote:
I'm including blocking of future versions of Mozilla in the next
revision of my dynamic site code due to this issue (I don't have to
treat Mozilla any better than
Jay Garcia wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Win32-200303
I haven't nailed down specifically what makes this happen, but
sometimes, when I press Ctrl-T to create a new tab, the tab gets
created to the left of the existing tabs, instead of to the right.
When
Jay Garcia wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Win32-200303
I haven't nailed down specifically what makes this happen, but
sometimes, when I press Ctrl-T to create a new tab, the tab gets
created to the left of the existing tabs
Jay Garcia wrote:
ZZT wrote:
Hi,
is there any way for doing that in mozilla?
thanks
EDIT / Prefs / Advanced / Proxies / Direct Connection
Crosspost cancelled, please don't crosspost, thanks
But that disables the Proxy settings for ALL URLs, he wants to just
bypass it for
Jay Garcia wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Jay Garcia wrote:
ZZT wrote:
Hi,
is there any way for doing that in mozilla?
thanks
EDIT / Prefs / Advanced / Proxies / Direct Connection
Crosspost cancelled, please don't crosspost, thanks
But that disables the Proxy settings for ALL URLs
Win32-200303
I haven't nailed down specifically what makes this happen, but
sometimes, when I press Ctrl-T to create a new tab, the tab gets created
to the left of the existing tabs, instead of to the right. When this
happens, I can't close the new tab.
Has anybody else seen this?
Tim
Tim Wunder wrote:
Win32-200303
I haven't nailed down specifically what makes this happen, but
sometimes, when I press Ctrl-T to create a new tab, the tab gets created
to the left of the existing tabs, instead of to the right. When this
happens, I can't close the new tab.
Has anybody
Pascal Chevrel wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Win32-200303
I haven't nailed down specifically what makes this happen, but
sometimes, when I press Ctrl-T to create a new tab, the tab gets created
to the left of the existing tabs, instead of to the right. When this
happens
Anybody know if a there's a bug that covers this crash? I've sent in a
couple of Talkbacks (TB37916181K and TB37916099X) on it. A bugzilla
search on CSS Crash yielded 81 hits. A search on the specific URL
yielded none.
http://www.graphics-muse.com/gmd.html
Regards,
Tim
Jay Garcia wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Anybody know if a there's a bug that covers this crash? I've sent in a
couple of Talkbacks (TB37916181K and TB37916099X) on it. A bugzilla
search on CSS Crash yielded 81 hits. A search on the specific URL
yielded none.
http://www.graphics-muse.com
Jay Garcia wrote:
madog wrote:
with the newest version 0.9.5+ (11.8), something new is added, as you
can see in the pic attached
the question is, how can it get rid of it ?
this new function is not very useful to me and i have not found any
setting about it in the preferences
thanks
RV wrote:
Brian S. Craigie wrote:
On 9/26/01 12:35 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Don't recommend N6 at the current time it works no better or perhaps
worse than Moz.
Netscape 6.1 could be recommended to anyone who wants a stable
browser supported and QAed extensively by a commercial
Rob wrote:
I have both 0.9.3 and 0.9.4 on my computer, and a page that I *think*
displayed correctly using .3 is broken using .4. I would like to run .3 to
find out, but am wondering if doing so will mung my profiles or registry
or
Not for me, anyway. I exit complete from
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Chris Tusk wrote:
Hi there all
I like using the facility of seeing the complete header on the
message. I
believe that the facility was available on previous versions of
Netscape.
The facility enabled the user to view the path that the e
Chris Tusk wrote:
Hi there all
I like using the facility of seeing the complete header on the message. I
believe that the facility was available on previous versions of Netscape.
The facility enabled the user to view the path that the e-mail message
followed to get to you, together with
Blake Ross wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Oh the high and mighty programmers. You remind me of puffed-up royalty
who try to convince the common people that only blue blooded persons
could possibly understand the complexities of running a state.
Blake, why don't you live in an arab country
Bill Lee wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Martin Poirier wrote:
Whee... I personally find a zip file much more convenient :-P
Tom Christensen wrote:
Why have moz.org removed the installer.exe to install via the net!.
?
Incredible stupid now I have to download this *.zip file witch
JTK wrote:
snip
... (hell even now they're talking they're not going to be a browser
company)
I believe they were talking about not being *just* a browser company.
They want to be *more* than a browser company, which does not preclude
them being a browser company at all. At least
Gervase Markham wrote:
After much thought, and with regret (because this is a last resort
solution), I therefore suggest and request that JTK be banned from this
newsgroup for a period of 3 months.
How, exactly, would you achieve that?
Trying to ban JTK is not a helpful act. We've tried
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], A Martinez says...
snip
BAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHAAA
Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes, can't it Mr. Lairo! Not to mention
HI-LARIOUS!
No Mr. Martinez, I think I probably had something to do with
JTK wrote:
Henno Buschmann wrote:
Hallo,
Henno Buschmann wrote:
*PLONK* (i hope it works already in Mozilla 0.92 ;) )
Mhmm, doesn't work :(
BAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHHAHAHHHHAHAHHAA!!!
You guys can't *POSSIBLY* *NOT* see the absolute ***HILARITY*** of this!
JTK wrote:
snip
How come you haven't learned how to use the shift key properly? And why
do you quote so much while adding so little?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Chris Withers wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Search bugzilla first. If you don't find it, enter an enhancement bug.
I did for two of the issues. I found a bug related to the IMAP one and voted for
it. One of my submissions was a dup, but it seems they get picked up pretty
quickly.
I guess
Chris Withers wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
2. How can I change the order of the columns in the view of an email folder?
AFAIK, you can't.
3. How can I change the priority of a message I've been sent? (It was
right-click and pick from menu in Netscape)
AFAIK, you can't.
That's a
JTK wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
[snip]
I'd love to see AOL be Linux-ONLY. That way they'd have exactly zero
customers and the AOL blight would disappear from the earth.
Who said anything about Linux only?
I did. Wouldn't that be sweet? No more AOL CD's choking the
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
fire-eyes wrote:
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
I and everyone else on the planet despise software which requires
rebooting after install. Especially if doing so is only so that said
software can load (or rather, preload) a bunch of crap into memory
which I don't want
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], DeMoN_LaG says...
jesus X wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
You're telling me Microsoft is going from 86% to 20%. That's a decrease of
66%.
Umm, there was a time when Netscape had 90+ percent of the market, and MS was
nowhere to be found. Pinhead.
He's
Slug wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Holger Metzger wrote:
On 6/3/01 8:53 PM, Marcin Nosarzewski wrote:
I've just installed Mozilla 0.9 on my Win98 and I think it's great.
But there's a little thing that makes me mad, a really small thing.
It's a sound when new message arrives. In NN
Chuck Simmons wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
JTK wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], DeMoN_LaG says...
jesus X wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
You're telling me Microsoft is going from 86% to 20%. That's a decrease of
66%.
Umm, there was a time when Netscape had 90+ percent of the market
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Of course, that could easily be corrected by taking a few seconds to
make the browser's built-in downloading more efficient and less
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
That can be said about NC4.7x as well. What's your point? What does that
have to do with filtering in newsgroups not working, or someone using OE
for mail/ne
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Are you using Netscape 4.77? several improvements related to Win2K went into
4.77
-Dan Veditz
What improvements? I'm asking because I'm about to roll-out Win2K
desktops with 4.76 installed (the Client Customization kit appears
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Are you using Netscape 4.77? several improvements related to Win2K went into
4.77
-Dan Veditz
What improvements? I'm asking because I'm about to roll-out Win2K
desktops with 4.76 installed (the Client Customization kit appears to be
only available for 4.76). If the
JTK wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
Well I'd hope so, given how much memory it hogs. Again, over 22MB *TO
DISPLAY A BLANK PAGE*.
I tell you what - we'll make a pre-app that brings up a GIF of Mozilla
showing a blank page. Then, when you click on it, it loads the real thing.
That way, you can
JTK wrote:
snip2
[snip]
Moz's Mail/News
compares very favorably to Outlook Express, I think. Though, admittedly, I
rarely use Outlook Express (Netscape 4.7x at work, KMail at home). Can you
change your e-mail identity while composing a message in Outlook Express?
That's a feature of
Gervase Markham wrote:
depends on how much influence AOL has on the
releases of Mozilla. I suspect that Moz has enough of a life of it's own
to hold back any AOL/Netscape pressure to release a 1.0 product when
it's not ready.
Why would AOL/Netscape want to pressure mozilla.org to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], N. Marshall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't used Netscape email since I got Outlook, because Outlook is
simply so much more advanced, slick, and usable.
How is it more advanced, slick, and usable. What features do you use in
Gervase Markham wrote:
There used to be a rather good Netscape 6 FAQ at
http://www.computeralt.com/~scott/ns6faq.html . It was handy for pointing
out to people who had wandered in here by mistake. However, it seems to
have vanished, and mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces. So, until he can
After eagerly awaiting Moz 0.8, I'm greatly disppointed by the state of
the Mail/News client.
Automatic word wrap on replies still doesn't work:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67405
There's no preference for how to handle returning receipts (could be a
duplicate bug, but I made a
Andreas Franke wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
5 seconds from clicking Reply to being able to compose the message using
the latest nightly (downloaded this morning) on a Pentium 233 w/ 128MB
Ram. The nightly I downloaded on December 21 had a similar response
time. Is this something
5 seconds from clicking Reply to being able to compose the message using
the latest nightly (downloaded this morning) on a Pentium 233 w/ 128MB
Ram. The nightly I downloaded on December 21 had a similar response
time. Is this something that will improve or is my machine just too slow
to run
60 matches
Mail list logo
