[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-0.9.0 fails on G5-Darwin-tiger

2009-02-18 Thread Bill Hart
That should be trivial to fix if we have the gcc revision. See line 428 of mpir-h.in. Bill. 2009/2/19 mabshoff : > > > > On Feb 18, 2:07 pm, Mariah wrote: >> Michael, > > Hi Mariah, > >> Even if I set SHAREDFLAGS=-fno-common, I get the same failure. > > Ok. I do believe that the fix for inline

[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-0.9.0 fails on G5-Darwin-tiger

2009-02-18 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 18, 2:07 pm, Mariah wrote: > Michael, Hi Mariah, > Even if I set SHAREDFLAGS=-fno-common, I get the same failure. Ok. I do believe that the fix for inline semantics for OSX does not cover that XCode release. Is this varro? Can you give us gcc -v in either case? > By the way, my confi

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Bill Hart
An mpirbench of 9000 might be achievable just with assembly work. Of course if the FFT and division code were improved, this could be substantially higher. It's hard to say by how much because the way the test calculates the score is somewhat involved. I wouldn't like to put a figure on it because

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread jason
On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:05:38 Jason Martin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, wrote: > > On Thursday 19 February 2009 00:49:16 Jason Martin wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > >> > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: > >> >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Jason Martin
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, wrote: > > On Thursday 19 February 2009 00:49:16 Jason Martin wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: >> > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: >> >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 >> >> >> >> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Jason Martin
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:51 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jason Martin > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 2241.9 2251 cicero (pen

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread jason
On Thursday 19 February 2009 00:49:16 Jason Martin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: > >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 > >> > >> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) > >> 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unkno

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jason Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: >>> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 >>> >>> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) >>> 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unknown-l

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Jason Martin
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 >> >> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) >> 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) >> 6024.5 7437.8 eno (core2-unknown-linux-gn

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Bill Hart
Hi Mariah, thanks very much for the bench results. We need to be slightly careful. Note that the license for gmpbench states that we may not report our results as gmpbench results, as we are not comparing official releases of GMP. For this reason we have forked gmpbench and called it mpirbench.

[mpir-devel] Re: gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread jason
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: > gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 > > 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) > 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) > 6024.5 7437.8 eno (core2-unknown-linux-gnu) > 6022.2 7387.1 fulvia (core2-pc-solar

[mpir-devel] Re: What to do about "divide exact by 3" in MPIR?

2009-02-18 Thread jason
On Sunday 15 February 2009 21:02:11 Bill Hart wrote: > On the right hand side of the first page of Granlund/Montgomery some > references are given to doing division by multiplying by divisors of > 2^k-1 (for small k). I guess this is the closest thing. > > Rereading our correspondence on this issu

[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-0.9.0 fails on G5-Darwin-tiger

2009-02-18 Thread Mariah
Michael, Even if I set SHAREDFLAGS=-fno-common, I get the same failure. By the way, my configure line is ./configure --disable-shared --prefix=... in case that makes a difference. Mariah On Feb 18, 11:40 am, mabshoff wrote: > On Feb 18, 8:37 am, Mariah wrote: > > Hi Mariah, > > > mpir-0.

[mpir-devel] gmpbench results on SkyNet

2009-02-18 Thread Mariah
gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) 6024.5 7437.8 eno (core2-unknown-linux-gnu) 6022.2 7387.1 fulvia (core2-pc-solaris2.10) 3367.8 3369.5 iras (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) 13

[mpir-devel] Re: mpir-0.9.0 fails on G5-Darwin-tiger

2009-02-18 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 18, 8:37 am, Mariah wrote: Hi Mariah, > mpir-0.9.0 built with gcc-4.3.3 fails 'make check' on G5-Darwin-tiger > (powerpc970-apple-darwin8.11.0): > > gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -mcpu=970 -O3 -o t-bswap t-bswap.o  ./.libs/ > libtests.a /usr/local/mpir-0.9.0/src/obj-G5-Darwin-tiger- > gcc-4.3.3/

[mpir-devel] mpir-0.9.0 fails on G5-Darwin-tiger

2009-02-18 Thread Mariah
mpir-0.9.0 built with gcc-4.3.3 fails 'make check' on G5-Darwin-tiger (powerpc970-apple-darwin8.11.0): gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -mcpu=970 -O3 -o t-bswap t-bswap.o ./.libs/ libtests.a /usr/local/mpir-0.9.0/src/obj-G5-Darwin-tiger- gcc-4.3.3/.libs/libgmp.a ../.libs/libgmp.a ld64-62.1 failed: duplicate

[mpir-devel] About autotuners and evolutionary algorithms

2009-02-18 Thread jmakov
I would like to hear various opinions on autotuners [http:// view.eecs.berkeley.edu/wiki/Autotuners ] in mathematical libraries/sw. One successful we already have - ATLAS. Also various approaches with evolutionary algorithms seem to be interesting and rewardful. Since I lack a deep knowledge of

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 0.9.0 Released

2009-02-18 Thread jason
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 18:12:26 Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM, wrote: > > I thought > > svn merge trunk/ branch/ . > > I think you want > > svn merge branch trunk > > (merges branch into trunk, i.e. AT&T style, rather than intel style ;-) > Thanks /mpir/branch