I've made the mpir-0.9 branch in our svn repo.
Basically if we have *any* bug fixes, then we will apply them to trunk
and to mpir-0.9. We'll then issue mpir-0.9.1, mpir-0.9.2 etc until the
next major release comes out.
The important thing to note is that if *any* changes are made to
mpir-0.9.0,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM, wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote:
>> > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>> >
>> > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder
>> > core-2 benchmarks are crap
>>
>> There
On Friday 20 February 2009 20:37:50 Cactus wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:18 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote:
> > > > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and
On Feb 20, 8:18 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
> > > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder
> > > core-2 benchmarks are crap
On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> >
> > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder
> > core-2 benchmarks are crap
>
> There aren't any :-) I was just using Gaudry's code for t
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:45 AM, mabshoff
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 8:45 am, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
> Jason: those numbers already *rock*
>
>> Some benchmarks on core2-unknown-linux-gnu (sage.math)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
>> X7460 @ 2.66GHz
>>
>> 8307 on trunk r1623 , should be same sco
On Feb 20, 8:45 am, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
Jason: those numbers already *rock*
> Some benchmarks on core2-unknown-linux-gnu (sage.math)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
>
> X7460 @ 2.66GHz
>
> 8307 on trunk r1623 , should be same score as mpir-0.9.0
> 10252 on core-2 branch r1623
>
>
> On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
> What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder core-2
> benchmarks are crap
There aren't any :-) I was just using Gaudry's code for those routines.
Should be able to use your amd64 code for those eve
Some benchmarks on core2-unknown-linux-gnu (sage.math)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
X7460 @ 2.66GHz
8307 on trunk r1623 , should be same score as mpir-0.9.0
10252 on core-2 branch r1623
a 23.4% speedup .
I keep getting
make[5]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete
On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder core-2
benchmarks are crap
> Running the k8/k10 asm code with no changes on the core2 machine sage we
> get this
>
> popcount,hamdist no popcount instructi
Running the k8/k10 asm code with no changes on the core2 machine sage we get
this
popcount,hamdist no popcount instruction
slowdowns-
add,sub are 0.50x
rshift1,lshift1 0.70x
k8 lshift,rshift 0.91x
addmul_1,submul_1 0.89x but faster for <20 limbs...
speedups--
and,ior,xor
On Thursday 19 February 2009 00:49:16 Jason Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote:
> >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0
> >>
> >> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu)
> >> 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unkno
12 matches
Mail list logo
