On Friday 20 February 2009 20:37:50 Cactus wrote: > On Feb 20, 8:18 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > > On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote: > > > > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote: > > > > > > > > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder > > > > core-2 benchmarks are crap > > > > > > There aren't any :-) I was just using Gaudry's code for those > > > routines. > > > > When you said the addmul is nearly optimal , I just assumed that the > > basecase was as well.. > > > > > Should be able to use your amd64 code for those even on core2. The > > > only big difference would be in inc/dec instructions which we can > > > easily replace with "add" or even "lea" depending on if we need to > > > preserve the carry bit for the loop. > > > > If that is the main/only change then I'll do it tomorrow and merge into > > trunk , I dont want to spend much time on it now , I want to get on with > > the new division code (get the low hanging fruit first) > > > > > I've got a little time next week, so I'll look at merging your code to > > > core-2 then (unless you do it first). > > > > > > --jason > > Will I be able to easily see these changes so I can mirror them for > Windows? > > Can I assume that a compare between the amd64 and core2 versions after > you do this will tell me what I need to do on Windows? > > Brian >
Yes and Yes , should be just inc/dec to add/sub/lea etc > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
