On Feb 20, 8:18 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Friday 20 February 2009 16:42:19 Jason Martin wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 20 February 2009 14:12:19 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
> > > What happened to core-2 mul_basecase and sqr_basecase ? , no-wonder
> > > core-2 benchmarks are crap
>
> > There aren't any :-) I was just using Gaudry's code for those routines.
>
> When you said the addmul is nearly optimal , I just assumed that the basecase
> was as well..
>
> > Should be able to use your amd64 code for those even on core2. The
> > only big difference would be in inc/dec instructions which we can
> > easily replace with "add" or even "lea" depending on if we need to
> > preserve the carry bit for the loop.
>
> If that is the main/only change then I'll do it tomorrow and merge into
> trunk , I dont want to spend much time on it now , I want to get on with the
> new division code (get the low hanging fruit first)
>
> > I've got a little time next week, so I'll look at merging your code to
> > core-2 then (unless you do it first).
>
> > --jason
Will I be able to easily see these changes so I can mirror them for
Windows?
Can I assume that a compare between the amd64 and core2 versions after
you do this will tell me what I need to do on Windows?
Brian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mpir-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
