Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
OK, thanks. I'll add that program to the relevant makefile.am. Bill. On 27 September 2012 22:32, Brian Gladman wrote: > -Original Message- From: Bill Hart > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:06 PM > To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com > Cc: Brian Gladman > > Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re:

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
All the tests pass on MinGW32, including the fft tests. So this is good news. Tomorrow I will try to sort out the tuning issues. I also just noticed that make speed doesn't work. It seems to be due to some problems in speed.h. I'll add it to the list of things to fix. Bill. On 27 September 2012

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Brian Gladman
-Original Message- From: Bill Hart Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:06 PM To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com Cc: Brian Gladman Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress Hi Brian, After discovering that the libtool in MinGW32 is different in version number by 0.001 and th

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
On 27 September 2012 21:06, Brian Gladman wrote: > -Original Message- From: Bill Hart > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 8:01 PM > To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress > > Hi Brian, > > the file name: > > mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-t

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Brian Gladman
-Original Message- From: Bill Hart Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 8:01 PM To: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress Hi Brian, the file name: mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-tests/f.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2/f.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2.vc

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Hi Brian, the file name: mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-tests/f.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2/f.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2.vcxproj is still too long. The maximum length appears to be 99, so we are still 1 character over the limit I think. I think we should change all the truncates to trunc in the ff

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Brian Gladman
-Original Message- From: Bill Hart Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:19 PM To: Cactus Cc: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress Yes, we should change the name of the file in the fft directory and the test file in the tests/fft directory.

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Brian Gladman
-Original Message- From: Bill Hart Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:19 PM To: Cactus Cc: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress Yes, we should change the name of the file in the fft directory and the test file in the tests/fft directo

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Herewith latest release todo list: mpir-todo: == * fft_combine_bits const warning (see below) * ../mpn/generic/gcdext.c:238: warning: integer overflow in expression * _mp_release_macro volker braun reported * tuning problems with fft cutoffs * filename mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-tests/ff

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Some good news. If I hack together a tarball on my linux machine for mpir using make dist then copy this to my MinGW32 machine, it builds no problem. I still cannot figure out for the life of me what is different between the two. According to svn, there is no difference!! It seems we simply cann

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Brian Gladman
-Original Message- From: Bill Hart Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:19 PM To: Cactus Cc: mpir-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress Yes, we should change the name of the file in the fft directory and the test file in the tests/fft directo

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Yes, we should change the name of the file in the fft directory and the test file in the tests/fft directory. We'll have to use something like: fft_ifft_mfa_trunc_sqrt2.c, etc I don't think we can abbreviate much more than that without changing a whole load of other files to be consistent. I thi

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Cactus
On Thursday, 27 September 2012 16:43:55 UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote: > More bad news. > > The filename > > mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-tests/fft.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2/fft.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2.vcxproj > > > is apparently too long, so we cannot create a tarball of MPIR. > > How do we w

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
More bad news. The filename mpir-2.5.1/build.vc10/mpir-tests/fft.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2/fft.fft_ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2.vcxproj is apparently too long, so we cannot create a tarball of MPIR. Bill. On 27 September 2012 15:57, Bill Hart wrote: > Obviously yasm files cannot be responsible f

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Obviously yasm files cannot be responsible for configure not filling config.h correctly. And the autom4te.cache files are only to speed up autoreconf, not the build system itself. (I tried committing these, but this didn't fix the problem.) Running autoreconf -i followed by svn commit now yields

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Omigosh!! There was a single \n in the middle of a comment in the config.in generated on MinGW32 which prevented me from committing it to the repo. After fixing this I was able to commit the differences to the autotools files as generated by MinGW32's autoreconf 2.68 over the Linux autoreconf 2.68

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
This did not work. The problem is I *cannot* commit the changes to svn because of Windows line endings. Changing the svn:eol-style to native for those files does not fix the problem (this only affects the line style used when the file is checked out). Making this change to svn properties and then

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Pavel Holoborodko" To: Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:21 PM Subject: Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress I've selected "Download latest repository catalogues" during the installation instead of default "Use pre-packaged repository catal

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
Some possible good news. The autoconf/autoreconf/automake versions I have on MinGW32 are *identical* to the ones we have on our linux development machine. This further confirms my suspicions that this is an extremely irritating autotools bug. There should be no difference whatsoever in the config

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Bill Hart
It's possible to delete posts if you wish. However, I personally see no problem with this being on list. Bill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from t

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Sisyphus" Hi Pavel, (This is an offlist post.) Ummm ... perhaps not, though that was my intention ... ;- Cheers, Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send ema

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Pavel Holoborodko
I've selected "Download latest repository catalogues" during the installation instead of default "Use pre-packaged repository catalogues". Plus I've also included MSYS, C++ and Fortran compilers in "Select Components" window. Hope this helps. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Sisyphus wrote: >

Re: [mpir-devel] Re: MPIR 2.6 release progress

2012-09-27 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Pavel Holoborodko" My environment: 1. Windows 7 Ultimate x64. 2. Latest MinGW32 with gcc 4.7.0 (installed from official site: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Installer/mingw-get-inst/mingw-get-inst-20120426/mingw-get-inst-20120426.exe/download )