Re: [mpir-devel] mpirxx.h file missing, Visual Studio2013

2014-05-30 Thread Marc
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 23:21:49 UTC+2, Cactus a écrit : > > On 30/05/2014 21:27, leif wrote: > > >> Error1error C4146: unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, > result > >> still unsigned > >> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio > >> 12.0\VC\include\mpirxx.h1181GBP1 > > >

Re: [mpir-devel] mpirxx.h file missing, Visual Studio2013

2014-05-30 Thread Marc
Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 21:24:49 UTC+2, Guillermo Ramírez a écrit : > Does the above mean that the user needs to change the mpirxx.h file to a > specific > arithmetic type? > No, the user shouldn't touch mpirxx.h. > I am trying to use the open source libDAI library and am having several > e

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR fails in "make check"

2013-09-02 Thread Marc
Le lundi 2 septembre 2013 17:10:54 UTC+2, Peter Sebastian Nordholt a écrit : > > wget http://www.mpir.org/mpir-2.6.0.tar.bz2 > > tar xvjf mpir-2.6.0.tar.bz2 > cd mpir-2.6.0 > sudo ./configure --enable-gmpcompat --enable-cxx > sudo make > sudo make check > sudo make install > Bill has the right ques

[mpir-devel] Re: Small changes to the Windows port and other stuff

2013-09-01 Thread Marc
Hello, not trying to discourage you from using MPIR in any way, but I noticed a couple things: In terms of license and support for Windows this fork of the library seems > much stronger. > MPIR uses the same license as GMP (it regularly imports code from it), so I fail to see how the license

[mpir-devel] Re: Problem building linbox on top of MPIR from 2.5.x

2012-11-25 Thread Marc
On Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:35:05 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:07:24 AM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> While trying to upgrade MPIR in Sage, we got problems building Linbox on >> top of MPIR > 2.5.x, including MPIR 2.6.0. >> You

[mpir-devel] Re: Memory Allocation

2011-11-09 Thread Marc
On Nov 8, 5:44 pm, Bob Smith wrote: > On 11/4/2011 8:01 PM, Marc wrote: > > > On Nov 5, 12:23 am, Bob Smith  wrote: > >> Using MPIR 2.4.0, I'm substituting my own memory allocator which gets > >> called from tal-reent.c in __gmp_tmp_reentrant_alloc.  The code

[mpir-devel] Re: Memory Allocation

2011-11-04 Thread Marc
On Nov 5, 12:23 am, Bob Smith wrote: > Using MPIR 2.4.0, I'm substituting my own memory allocator which gets > called from tal-reent.c in __gmp_tmp_reentrant_alloc.  The code in that > function doesn't check to see if the allocation failed and immediately > writes into the memory, allocated or not

[mpir-devel] Re: Another disagreement between documentation and mpir.h

2011-05-08 Thread Marc
On May 8, 1:35 am, Jason wrote: > I suppose a windows text editor would add nl/cr subversion might not be the most modern software on earth, but it does handle cr/lf differences between unix, mac and windows, if properly configured... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[mpir-devel] Re: Another disagreement between documentation and mpir.h

2011-05-04 Thread Marc
On May 3, 1:00 am, Bill Hart wrote: > I think the unsigned long int is correct this time. I see no reason > why the remove function should return a number of bits. Well, if the factor being removed is 2, the number of times you can factor it out of a number with n+1 bits like 2^n is... -- You r

[mpir-devel] Re: MPIR Announcement

2010-04-09 Thread Marc
Hello, I am not sure I understand what is going on with MPIR. When the fork happened, 2 of the main stated goals where: 1) LGPL2 (required for sage+microsoft) --> MPIR is now LGPL3+ only 2) a more open development process --> the public svn repository has been unavailable for months, the public ma

[mpir-devel] Re: Bug on Solaris

2010-01-06 Thread Marc
The easiest fix is to include instead. > A few days ago, whilst investigating this, I found the following from > Marc Glisse on the gmp mailing list which seems to be a comment > directed at us > > http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2009-February/001273.html > > &qu

[mpir-devel] Re: A talk on MPIR

2009-05-23 Thread Marc
On May 22, 9:49 pm, Bill Hart wrote: > The main reason I recommended not to use that function in time > critical stuff is it is very, very slow (for reasons I don't > understand). When the endianness and everything is right, mpz_import and mpz_export use MPN_COPY which calls copyi (on platforms

[mpir-devel] Re: Fast computation of binomial coefficients

2009-05-02 Thread Marc
w that may be completely irrelevant for any realistic implementation... It places the parallelism at the lowest level, which is why I was mentioning vector architectures, but I don't think any vector architecture provides the right instructions to m

[mpir-devel] Re: Fast computation of binomial coefficients

2009-04-30 Thread Marc
ayer (similar to mpn, but more robust) What is "more robust"? -- Marc Glisse --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@g