On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, user923005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 6:23 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've been doing some thinking about licensing and what I personally
>> really care about.
>>
>> I realise there are only four things that really matter to me:
>>
On Nov 16, 6:23 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been doing some thinking about licensing and what I personally
> really care about.
>
> I realise there are only four things that really matter to me:
>
> 1) That my copyright notice be maintained.
> 2) That any offer to redistribute
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes you are right. Of course for a project like MPIR it would have to
> be something like B. We'd have to have a well defined "MPIR Group"
> which would be allowed to make decisions about commercial use. This
> group could c
Yes you are right. Of course for a project like MPIR it would have to
be something like B. We'd have to have a well defined "MPIR Group"
which would be allowed to make decisions about commercial use. This
group could consist of the current active developers (and all
interested past contributors) w
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realise there are only four things that really matter to me:
>
> 1) That my copyright notice be maintained.
> 2) That any offer to redistribute in binary form is accompanied by an
> equal offer to redistribute in source form
Yeah I certainly don't disagree with that. Of course all contributions
to date are LGPL anyway, so no problem there.
Bill.
2008/11/16 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I've been doing some thinking about licensing a
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been doing some thinking about licensing and what I personally
> really care about.
>
> I realise there are only four things that really matter to me:
>
> 1) That my copyright notice be maintained.
> 2) That any offer t
I've been doing some thinking about licensing and what I personally
really care about.
I realise there are only four things that really matter to me:
1) That my copyright notice be maintained.
2) That any offer to redistribute in binary form is accompanied by an
equal offer to redistribute in so
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Michael Abshoff has been working away at that.
Yes, getting native windows support for Sage is a very high
priority for us. And people at Microsoft Research are financially
(and otherwise) supporting this effort, which is
Michael Abshoff has been working away at that.
Of course eMPIRe runs natively on Windows due to the work of Brian
Gladman, who is one of our key developers.
Bill.
2008/11/1 user923005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Oct 31, 6:20 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm sure you realise Wil
On Oct 31, 6:20 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure you realise William Stein is the lead developer of Sage, and
> eMPIRe is being essentially developed for Sage.
I did not know that. Once it runs natively on Windows, I will
definitely give it a run around the block.
> What wa
I'm sure you realise William Stein is the lead developer of Sage, and
eMPIRe is being essentially developed for Sage.
What was the TV show? Do you recall where you saw it?
Bill.
2008/11/1 user923005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Oct 31, 5:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fr
On Oct 31, 5:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:20 PM, user923005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 1:13 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Thanks for your comments user923005. You can use GPL code in a
> >> commercial environment.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:20 PM, user923005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 1:13 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for your comments user923005. You can use GPL code in a
>> commercial environment. You just can't distribute it with and make it
>> a part of a commercial
On Oct 31, 1:13 pm, "Bill Hart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your comments user923005. You can use GPL code in a
> commercial environment. You just can't distribute it with and make it
> a part of a commercial product. So you can use it for work, you just
> can't sell it. That's fair en
Thanks for your comments user923005. You can use GPL code in a
commercial environment. You just can't distribute it with and make it
a part of a commercial product. So you can use it for work, you just
can't sell it. That's fair enough in my view. If I write the code for
free, I can't see why othe
16 matches
Mail list logo
