Hello!
How should I code the request program A, written in C onn the server, so
that if the message (sent to program B (COBOL/CICS) in the host) is not
delivered for security reason, program A will still get a response
(Reason=2035). Notice that program B was not even triggered. I think I
should u
Does support pack ms0H do what you want?
Kevin Ferguson
From: "Wert, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Queue Depth Monitor for MQ 5.2.1 on Windows 2000
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:40:34 -0700
I was wondering if anyone had a m
I was wondering if anyone had a monitoring tool that can be shared.
What I'm looking for is a program that can be run every 10-15 minutes on our
Windows 2000 server. It gets a list of the MQSeries queues that have
messages, compares this list with a file containing the queue names and
their indiv
Talks to the appropriate OS/390 sysprog. These messages are from RACF, a different kettle of fish. John Gilmore - Original Message - From: Stubbs, Colleen H. Sent: 14 February, 2003 15:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: User authentication with OS/390 MQSeries Does MQSeries for OS/390
sounds like the pointy hair boss, clueless decisions based on the premise
of: "thats the way we've always done it."
Glen Larson
Zurich North America
"Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 02/14/2003 01:41:44 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRR013I & ICH408I are RACF message, Racf Blocks the bind not MQS
-Original Message-
From: Stubbs, Colleen H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: User authentication with OS/390 MQSeries
Does MQSeries for OS/390 do any kind of
Great idea, but management agrees with using the DLQ. Happy trails Bobbee.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
I agree with all that was said about why it's a
Does MQSeries for OS/390 do any kind of user authentication?
A white paper entitled MQSeries Security White Paper, page 4, states "It is
important to note that MQSeries does not get involved with identification and
authentication of users." However, on the job log for the MQ master address
My most favorite saying is
"it's easier to get forgiveness than permission!"
So with that in mind I like Stephan's arguments and of course his ultimate
solution.
Change security so only the QMGR can write to the DLQ
I am also in agreement with Stephan on one other point. Everyone have a
grea
I thought of making the local queue as big as the DLQ, but they would not
agree.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
Until the dead letter queue fills, in whic
I agree with all that was said about why it's a bad idea to use the DLQ from
within ANY applciation. As a systems administrator I wouldn't even argue
with any developer about that, but instead revoke access to the DLQ from any
userID other than the started task or mqm user. Filling up the dead lett
Until the dead letter queue fills, in which case, your programmers should have their
resumes ready.
There's an irresistble urge to rely on MQ to deliver messages in sequence. Many try
and get away with it for awhile. However, the restrictions are so broad that sooner or
later one of them will b
I was seeing that Mqseries classes for JMS(5.2.2) is available for all
different platforms like nt,200,unix etc.
So when we use Mqseries classes for JMS should it be based on the platform
on which the application is running or on which we have the mqseries and
wmqi running.
In our case we have mqse
Yes I agree with them all. Every shop I have been in in some way does
something very unique to handle this problem
It's calledTHINKING
From: "Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messa
Tim,
Thank you for responding. I am following the C
language code fragment in the application programming
guide. I am also attaching the code. incase you would
like to see it. Thank you for the help.
--- Tim Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without seeing more I'm guessing the 8 refers to th
Maximum queue depth . . . . : 9
-Original Message-
From: Anderson, Lizette T. (RyTull)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
Funny.
I made another attempt to have the programmers change it
Robert,
IBM states that the 'EARLY' code is downward compatible, and having
upgraded several releases in the past, I expect that it will work.
Using 2.1 / 5.2 as an example. We were unable to use the 2.1 ISPF panels
to view 5.2 queue managers, and the reverse. The utilites for old version
conti
That is what I told them. They said "no" other shops must be doing
something unique to handle this. Thanks everyone.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: messages out of order
T
Lizette,
as bobbie says, they need to do a better job of sizing their queue. what
will they do if some other application has a legitimate error and fills of
the 'shared', 'system' dlq?If they must have their results in sequence,
then they need to spend a little time and add a few lines of co
Thanks for this hint, seems to be a good approach!
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Februar 2003 13:56
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: Get QMGR name in WMQI 2.1 Flow
Promotional Properties are a way of intr
Could someone please tell me if MQ V5.3 is downward compatible
to V5.2 on the mainframe? If I apply early code for v5.3 will utilities and QMGRs
using the old v5.2 libraries still run with no problems? Can v5.2 and v5.3 QMGRs
in the same Q-sharing group coexist? Will cobol coded progra
Title: Using MQSeries ActiveX components and MQ Client
Here is the sitrep:
I have two servers. ServerA is running Windows NT and has MQSeries Server version 5.1 installed. ServerB is a Windows 2000 Web server that is hosting my web application and has MQSeries Client version 5.2 installed. I a
Title: Re: MQSeries and Delphi
Hi all
I am writing a Delphi Client app, using the Delphi Files(cmqpas.zip) by Dinko Miljak. The app just puts/gets a message on/from a queue. It works fine when running on the server but when it runs on the client it does not connect to the queue manager on t
Bobbee,
That's great news regarding your next contract. Have a cold one for me!
John Dawson
-Original Message-
From: Robert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: AMI
Thanks everyone for the r
Like I always say, "If at first you don't succeedREAD THE MANUAL!"
Thank you for the information. It warms my heart to know
haow "PURE" things are kept!!
bobbee
From: "Bock, Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EM
Promotional Properties are a way of introducing Variable on a Message Flow
level to your nodes. As an example. Say you are dealing with a database in
your compute node. Your datasource name is XYZ in dev, ABC in Test and UVW
in UAT. You can define a promotional property for the Message Flow for Dat
It works very well to us. We have v52, v521, v53. I really like v53. It's
much robust. Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Geok Hoon FOO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can MQ V5.2 & Websphere MQ V5.3 co-exist?
Hi,
We plan
@Manuel
if the java code is part of support pack please tell me what's it's name?
@all
I need the qmgr name to create an ID, I think I will just set the name by
myself and do not grep the qmgr from WMQI.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: "Rodríguez Alvarez-Querol, Manuel Carlos"
on the same network, you can have severals levels of MQ, without
any problem.
on the same box (iSeries, Aix, Win, ...) you can have only ONE
level of MQ.
MQ5.2 can exchange messages with 5.3, 5.1, 5.0, even 2.x if some
5.x options are not set.
And all your programs should work without recompilati
Hi,
I got this message came out on our console. It just
curious, what kind of access actually this cics
default id trying to do:
USER(DFLTT015) GROUP(DFLTID ) NAM
MQG1.CONTEXT CL(MQADMIN )
INSUFFICIENT ACCESS AUTHORITY
ACCESS INTENT(READ ) ACCESS ALLOWED(NONE)
TIA for any help.
Joe
_
To implement this method in java is quite simple. If you want me to code it
for you just tell me. It shouldn´t take you more than 30 minutes.
Cheers,
Manuel Carlos Rodriguez
IBM Certified Specialist - WebSphere MQ
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Bock, Christian [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Env
Hi,
from "Application Programming Reference", MQGMO-Option Field:
[...]
This option is not valid with any of the following options:
MQGMO_UNLOCK
MQGMO_WAIT
[...]
You said you are using signal AND wait option?
Regards
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vince Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL P
The sourcequeue field is a feature of the WMQI. The MQMD header of the WMQI
is expanded by two fields. You'll find this in the "Working with messages"
book on page 126.
But what Do you mean with 'Promote Properties'?
The methods Manuel mentiones would be very helpful, but I don't have a
plugin No
I will be out of the office starting 02/14/2003 and will not return until
02/17/2003.
I will be out of the office. Jim Wendorf and Tom Greogrich are available if
you need a response today.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide a
34 matches
Mail list logo
