Hello Neil,
If this is a TCP client, this is possible (that connection on a server outlives the
client app). Try to play with keepalive (I am not sure what is the default timeout on
Windows though; on Solaris, it is set machine-wide and the default is sometimes 2
hours). You can try to set HBIN
Thanks, Peter!
Will know whom to ask if I have problems.
If anyone has it working with just basic MQ, please share you experience.
Sincerely,
Pavel
"Potkay, Peter M
(PLC, IT)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL
Actually, Bristol does offer a development only version which we've considered so I guess number 3 wins
Bubba Michael Dag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve,
I don't think we are full circle yet... maybe it's not a circle but a 8 (don't know how to draw it otherwise)
The ball started w
Sid, are you trying these commands on a 5.1 system, or a 5.3 system? At 5.1,
the wild cards will not work. Only at 5.3.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Setmqaut on v5.1
Yep..trie
Yep..tried that one!...no luck
Sid
-Original Message-
From: Nick Dilauro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2004 3:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Setmqaut on v5.1
Did you try TST.** ? I believe TST.* will only work for TST.XXX and not for
TST.XXX.YYY.
Nick
-
All,
Does anyone know if it's necessary to have a unique key ring for each queue
manager on z/OS ? On the distributed side, it is necessary. From my
reading in WMQ Security (z/OS), I think you use the same key ring for all
queue managers, but I'm not 100% sure about this.
Any help is apprecia
Title: Message
Steve,
I
don't think we are full circle yet... maybe it's not a circle but a 8 (don't
know how to draw it otherwise)
The
ball started with Roger's post which started with Developers saying "where's my
message - MQ lost it".
Roger
knows very well tools like TransactionVision
Title: Message
John,
I think this discussion has gone around in a circle. If
your developer asks "where's my message - MQ lost it" then you
do have a way to prove otherwise - some message tracking software e.g.
Bristol's TransactionVision amongst others. Isn't that where we
started. The
All,
The hosting company where Capitalware Inc. has its web site (
www.capitalware.biz ) had one of its main computer compromised late Thursday
(April 29 Eastern time). It is now back online.
If anyone sent me or Capitalware Inc. email within the last 24 hours, could you
please resend it.
Sorry
Sounds like your platform is MVS??
It's in the Sys Admin Guide.
ARCHIVE LOG MODE(QUIESCE)
There is also a TIME parameter.
Hope that helped.
Gina
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Williams, Dave (Systems Management)
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004
Hello MQ'ers,
I am trying to install DB2 7.1 using Terminal Services on a remote
Windows2000 Terminal.
The installation goes to a certain extent, and halts without any error.
The latest entries in the DB2.log are like this:
-
Administration Server:
Log On Username:db2admin
I'm afraid they will argue.
It's the old "real money" issue. That is, spend
outside an already agreed software budget versus spend against an agreed
development budget. ie. they have to pay you anyway so you're paid to find
a solution to the problem.
They don't care that your costs are
Anyone know how to force the logs to archive? I don't know where to
look.
Thanks,
Dave W.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Bridge / Adapter. I don't know the difference -- yet. I am reading and
reading and reading. Fortunately this is occurring in development and not
production. I am trying some stuff.
"Beinert,
William" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a scenario where I need to send a response message within 30 seconds; however,
if the application didn't put the response back by then, I still need to send a
message saying something like " In process" or other user defined messages. I'm
looking for a solutions or SupportPack to mee
Peter is right on about the bridge (a real PITA to track down errors in this
environment, IMHO) but Dick says he has a problem with the Adapter - and these are
Bridge problems. I can't imagine the Adapter generating these kinds of errors.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mai
Del,
this
whole discussion started with "we have no money... "
maybe
you as a designer can talk to the sales guys to come up with "development"
license fees in addition to "production" license fees?
you
could also see this as a stepping stone as people get used to functionality, no
one will ar
Title: Message
To put
this as a problems and not a suggestion or solution as James requested, I
think a fundamental problem is that it is difficult to track messages once
they have been removed from a queue. Thus if an
application puts a message on a local queue and another one has been left
rea
yes, but what about non-persistent messages?...
I know that companies such as Cressida offer log recovery products, but I still like our solution best (as the designer, of course I am totally biased...)
-- I also agree very much with education of the LOB developers suggested by Bobbee and oth
Did you try TST.** ? I believe TST.* will only work for TST.XXX and not for
TST.XXX.YYY.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setmqaut on v5.1
Howdy all (a
An old IBM saying goes: It's better to have one queue manager with 100
queues than 10 queue managers with 10 queues each...
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W Samuel
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Server Far
I fully agree with Frank. As a matter of fact, I had a conversation with IBM about that about 3 weeks ago. I told them that we needed a tool to be able to track messages from the time we received it to the point it left my queue manager. This would include CICS gets/puts, Database time, etc.
I am going to offer another opinion about message tracking.
IBM logs message activity within its own logs for recovery purposes. I just
think the exit you propose is a duplication of the internal MQ logging. IBM
made use of the MQ logs in the creation of the MO12 (MQSeries for OS/390 -
Log extra
Unfortunately, the biggest thing that continually trips up most
developers is their belief in their own ability; there couldn't possibly
be anything wrong with their code, could there ?
But seriously, as Bobbee said, its about education; most developers
don't understand the implications of what th
Hi everyone,
What are parameters that we would consider for
deciding on the specifications for a Server that'll
host initially 10 queue managers and that can grow in
future ... has to be 24 x 7
Looking at AIX as the operating system .. but not
clear on how to arrive at the specs for such a host
s
James,
In my experience the most common problem has been programmer
ignorance. I do not mean to disparage programmers by this, some simply do
not understand MQ. For instance I get phone calls where a user wants to know
why their 'queue isn't running'. You don't know what you don't know. In
I think there is a lot of good stuff already in the product to insure that
the program knows what happened to its message(syncpoints, report messages,
etc). IF the programmers only take time to learn it, understand it,
implement it, and act upon it.
An MQAdmins job seems to be to prove MQ works an
When the IMS bridge receives a nonzero IMS-OTMA sense code, the IMS bridge
converts the sense code from hexadecimal to decimal, adds the value
MQFB_IMS_ERROR (300), and places the result in the Feedback field of the
reply message. This results in the feedback code having a value in the range
MQFB_I
I'd be interested to hear what the most common scenarios are that lead
to developers believing that MQ lost their message, particularly when
using the JMS API. As has been mentioned in this thread, this isn't the
sort of complaint that you hear raised against ftp or databases, but
does seem to occu
I have inherited MQSeries Adapter for IMS.
I am somewhat familiar with MQ but not IMS.
A programmer is getting a feedback code of 335. Does anyone know where to
look up these codes?
It doesn't seem to be in MQ Messages and Codes?
MQSeries v5.2,
IMS v7,
OS/390 v2.10
_
Rega
Pavel, we have done this with WL 6.1 and JMS. Been in production for about 3
months.
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Tolkachev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Extended Transactional Client & WLS
Hello,
Has anyone gotten
Just remember (from the Clusters manual):
"You can issue the RESET CLUSTER command only from full repository queue managers."
Mike Davidson
TSYS MQ Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/29/2004 10:32 PM
Please respond to MQSeries
Don't even consider this unless you are 5.3. Clustering is much improved at
this level.
Check out this doc, which is "MD05: MQSeries - Design considerations for
large Clusters":
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=203&q1=mA1J&uid=swg24006367&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
And this one, whic
IIRC on MVS the default is COMMIT, not BACKOUT when the application
fails
Dave
As long as MQ1 is a Full Repository, yes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removing a dead server from an MQ cluster
Howdy all,
I have a server (MQ2) that has been disconnected (f
Can anyone explain
what should happen if the above application has got a message under
syncpoint and then crashes. Logically I know that the message should
re-appear on the queue, especially if a disconnect is issued, but I'm
wondering how the qmanager knows that the application has died a
Anybody implemented
MQ in an OpenVMS cluster? Any guidelines / best practices
etc?
Steve.
Your concerns that the "workload balancing" benefits of clustering might not apply to your situation are valid. However, another (rather valuable) benefit to implementing MQ clustering in such an environment as yours with many qmgrs is the reduction in object definitions to maintain.
There are
"Give them a Fish and they eat for the day. Teach them to fish and they eat
forever". Maybe and education of MQ Architecture would be helpful. I know
"MOST" (?" developers can sit still for a few minutes to have explained WHY
the message cannot be lost. Works at my current site. AND THAT'S
GOVERNME
Sorry, but I don't understand your problem correctly - perhaps because
I don't know your input. Can you send me the input XML structure?
Tibor
> Tibor,
> Sorry I forgot to mention that I can have others tags under Books.
> But I need to fill the array with Book1 , 2 or 3 which ever exists.
And while you are at it - go straight to CSD06 or higher.
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Won't work because syntax definition of 'CASE'
#1
SET myVar = CASE UPPER(var)
WHEN 'AB' THEN '12'
WHEN 'CD' THEN '00'
WHEN 'EF' THEN '00'
WHEN 'GH' THEN '00'
END;
#2
SET myVar = CASE
WHEN UPPER(var) = 'AB' THEN '12'
WHEN UPPER(var) IN ('CD' , 'EF' , 'GH') THEN '
Hi Sid,
If you are using setmqaut on V5.1 Then you must not use a generic name
for the profile. Please refer the document for Version V5.1
System Admin (SC34-6068-00) is for Version 5.3
If it is failing on Version 5.3, I think you need to apply the fix for
it.
https://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/w
Actually I mis-spoke myself.
The API exit can be called *three times* for an MQGET, depending on
exactly which entry point(s) you activate.
1) Before MQGET - typically use to log things like options pointer values
and MQMD
(did the developer remember to reset message id, correl id, ccsid etc.).
T
Howdy all (again),
I am in the process of migrating an old v5.1 server to v5.3 on a new
platform. As part of the process I have moved a copy of the queue managers
over to the new Win2K machine and they work ok, but I am having security
nightmares prior to upgrading the MQ to v5.3
When I try:
Set
Am Do, den 29.04.2004 schrieb Adiraju, Rao um 23:31:
> If you think by showing all tracing
> reports to every tom, , and Harry and convince them that there messages
> aren't lost - you will have a huge battle ahead. By all this, newbie's will
> confuse and will scare more of the MQ product and
46 matches
Mail list logo
