Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-19 Thread Sid . Young
Good luck, I've never been able to get it to work. Sid -Original Message- From: Arvind Chaudhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ I am watching this discussion with quite some interest since I thought

R: Microsoft MQ (PROTOm@il:20040419473 CENTROSIM)

2004-04-19 Thread Alessandro Caffarra
I think that there is a big misunderstanding: MQ for Microsoft people stays for Missed Queue. -Messaggio originale- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: lunedì 19 aprile 2004 8.24 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Re: Microsoft MQ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]:20040419419 CENTROSIM

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-18 Thread Arvind Chaudhary
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM cc: (bcc: arvind.chaudhary/Polaris) Sent by: Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-15 Thread Emile Kearns
MSMQ is a very immature Messaging System compared with MQ, the functionality and operation does not get close to MQ. -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S Sent: 13 April 2004 05:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Microsoft MQ Fellow

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-14 Thread Taylor, Neil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 14 April 2004 01:25To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ Two important questions: 1. Does the vendor already have MSMQ infrastructure? 2. Does the vendor require local queuing? If neither is true, you can easilydemonstrate howWMQ client is cheaper

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-14 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
cynical, but true Adiraju, Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Z.CO.NZ cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ MQSeries List

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-14 Thread Taylor, Neil
Pre 5.3 is perhaps easiest, without the ssl options. We used 5.3 I believe but we needed a hot fix from MS. -Original Message- From: Ward, Mike S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2004 18:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ What version of MQ is required to use

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Taylor, Neil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 April 2004 16:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Microsoft MQ Fellow forum members, I need your help. We are and MQSeries MQSI shop running MQ on different platforms including Z/OS. I have been asked why we shouldn't bring in and integrate M$ MQ. Is it possible to do

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Williams, Arlen
MSMQ only runs on windows for a start. -Original Message- From: Ward, Mike S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Microsoft MQ Fellow forum members, I need your help. We are and MQSeries MQSI shop running MQ on different

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Taylor, Neil
: Microsoft MQ MSMQ is a microsoft only product - so will not run on anything but. MSMQ needs to use the MSMQ Bridge product to interface to MQSeries (the bridge is part of Host Integration Server suite) MSMQ is very complex to setup (maybe not to an MSCE) -Original Message- From: Ward

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Ronald Weinger
: Subject: Microsoft MQ Fellow forum members, I need your help. We are and MQSeries MQSI shop running MQ on different platforms including Z/OS. I have been asked why we shouldn't bring in and integrate M$ MQ. Is it possible to do this? Is there any reason for not doing this? Has anyone out

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Ward, Mike S
There is a vendor we are planning to do business with and they are an all M$ shop. The question was posed to us so now we have to deal with it. -Original Message-From: Ronald Weinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:33 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Ronald Weinger
the processes separate and avoid fingerpointing between IBM and MS when something breaks. Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/13/2004 12:03 PM Please respond to MQSeries List To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Ward, Mike S
What version of MQ is required to use the bridge? -Original Message- From: Taylor, Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ as I was saying The MSMQ Bridge cannot be used in an Active/ Active server

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Beinert, William
, and not before then. So they could do it if they could support it. Guess what they did Bill -Original Message-From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ronald WeingerSent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:03 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ You

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Miller, Dennis
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:04 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ There is a vendor we are planning to do business with and they are an all M$ shop. The question was posed to us so now we have to deal with it. -Original Message-From: Rona

Re: Microsoft MQ

2004-04-13 Thread Adiraju, Rao
tarts where logic ends". Cheers Rao From: Miller, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 April 2004 12:25 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Microsoft MQ Two important questions: 1. Does the vendor already have MSMQ infrastructure? 2. Does the vendor require local queuing? If neither is tru