On 09/04/16 18:25, Peter Eastman wrote:
> I really need to know whether and how to move forward with this. I think it
> would be a useful feature. It's certainly one that I would like to have!
> But I haven't gotten a lot of encouragement, much less advice on how to
> design/implement it. I'm no
Hi!
I have given the issue of sophisticated orchestral playback from score
editors a lot of thought since VSL released its Performance Tool, back
in... 2007-ish?
In the end, it all comes down to SEANS: Score Editors Are Not
Sequencers. Should they actually be?
Score editors are geared towards
On 20/10/15 01:35, ChurchOrganist wrote:
> Unfortunately, as I understand it, the SF2 format does not allow for this
> method of storage, being designed to be packaged up into a standalone
> soundfont, unlike SFZ which can store the samples separately.
>
> Storage as .WAV could lead to all sorts of
On 19/10/15 16:42, Lasconic wrote:
> It's for this reason that the translation updater is called "Resource
> manager". The plan was to extend it to more resources such as plugins,
> soundfonts, palette, styles and so on. However, it still means we need
> to package the soundfont with released ver
