On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17.37:58 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> A simple test for what I consider a "snappy" test. Resize a window
> under Linux. You very often see multiple rectangles being drawn as the
> graphics system tries to keep up. Also, the mouse often moves faster
> than the corner edg
On 4 January 2012 10:55, Martin Schreiber wrote:
>
> I don't think so. MSEgui X11 applications are as fast as gdi32 applications if
> they are not slowed down by a "modern" compositing window manager. From my
> point of view as GUI toolkit developer the X11 API is well designed,
As a GUI toolkit
On 3 January 2012 23:42, Lars wrote:
> i find it is X11 that
> is actually slowing things down. But since I have no evidence or proof it
> is the X11 bandwidth or wrappers or code indirection
X11 has a lot of latency issues - mostly due to its client/server
(network) based design. That is why it
On 3 January 2012 22:50, wrote:
> down. Even mozilla firefox seems to load web pages slower and less snappy
> than MS Windows.
That the snappy-ness under MS Windows could be because most recent web
browsers (Firefox, Chrome, IE9) are hardware accelerated. No such
hardware acceleration exists und
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 07.20:11 IvankoB wrote:
> being bound to tdbrealdisp.
>
Please use .format. AFAIK there were no changes.
Martin
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
inf
The only working C/C++ charset conversion code :
//--
wchar_t* mb2wstr(const char* inval) {
size_t size = strlen(inval); // FULL STRING SCAN
#define OUTSZ (size+1)*sizeof(wchar_t)
wchar_t* buf = (wchar_t*)malloc(OUTSZ); // HEAP_OPER_1
memset(buf, 0, OUTSZ); // HEAP
On Tuesday 03 January 2012 22.33:23 IvankoB for-mse wrote:
> >From my short LINUX C/C++ experience, it looks really difficult to
>
> write resourse-relaxed apps for LINUX. Just look into GTK2+, KDE4+ etc
> application "bricks". Also all they're C++ based thus a lot of dynamic
> memory fragmentation
On Tuesday 03 January 2012 21.50:19 nore...@z505.com wrote:
> Same here. I found linux to be slower than Windows XP and Windows 2000
> sadly, I think part of it is the X11 being slower than win32 gui calls,
> but I am not sure since I have never profiled to see what is slowing it
> down. Even mozi
8 matches
Mail list logo
