See the attachment.
<>--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the m
So "card32" instead of "cardinal32"
=
Sure, all shortened types should have similar length shortened parts :
integer = int
cardinal = card
word = (no need to shorten)
--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran D
Just have the compiler shift the (imaginary) base address
=
It may break connections with numbering in real-world task. What for
to do it if keeping this connection doesn't slow down performance ?
--
November Webin
On Monday 11 November 2013 00:07:54 Sieghard wrote:
> Hallo Martin,
>
> Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:47:30 +0100:
> > Can you describe how "typing easy" with your editor program works so it
> > is as easy to enter "cardinal32" as typing "card32"?
>
> Yes. It doesn't, as I don't _want_ to hav
The ALGOL syntax looks as a complication & seems to offer no benefits :)
For advanced syntax it worhs to look at Python (no "begin end" source
text garbage etc).
--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelera
You require theater seat numbers to start at 0 for each row as well?
Sine we'll have bit counts etc starting from 0 then it's more
consistent to count everything numeric from 0 as well :)
--
November W
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 15:47:30 +0100:
> Can you describe how "typing easy" with your editor program works so it
> is as easy to enter "cardinal32" as typing "card32"?
Yes. It doesn't, as I don't _want_ to have such a feature. I _do_ want to
type myself, without interfere
On Sunday 10 November 2013 14:14:26 Sieghard wrote:
> Hallo Martin,
>
> Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:00:07 +0100:
> > > After all, a programmer should not type most of the time, but _think_
>
>^
>
> > > about the structu
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:47:44 +0100:
> Sieghard suggests to use Algol 68 syntax instead to try to make the best
> of 30 years of programming experience.
> Opinions?
Don't try. There was _never_ a complete implementation of this language
around for all the time being, al
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:00:07 +0100:
> > After all, a programmer should not type most of the time, but _think_
^
> > about the structures his typing is to describe. Shouldn't he?
> BTW, how does your
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Sat, 9 Nov 2013 20:31:58 +0100:
> Your suggestion how to define the bit size of a type?
Well, specify the requested number of bits together with the bitfield's
identifier. There's a host of notations in use, e.g. the C-ish
": ", or a functional expression " ()" or s
11 matches
Mail list logo
