Re: [mssms] understanding Software Metering Data

m: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 9:28 AM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [mssms] understanding Software Metering Data > > Google skills have let me down. > > Anyone

[mssms] understanding Software Metering Data

Google skills have let me down. Anyone have a good link or explanation of the data in a software metering report? total usages = how many times it was opened and closed? specifically, if someone opens something, leaves it minimised and closes it after an hour is that whole hour classed as usag

[mssms] understanding Software Metering Data

Google skills have let me down. Anyone have a good link or explanation of the data in a software metering report? total usages = how many times it was opened and closed? specifically, if someone opens something, leaves it minimised and closes it after an hour is that whole hour classed as usag

Re: [mssms] RE: OT Powershell & Laps

able, but do a $computer | get-member And make sure it's the string you think it is. Thanks, Jeff Jerousek -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 11:5

[mssms] OT Powershell & Laps

Anyone know why this happens? Laps has some commandlets If I try Get-AdmPwdPassword -Computername Sam1 its fine. if i use a variable for the comp name like this, Get-AdmPwdPassword -Computername $Computer I get ‘URI formats are not supported’ The computer name has no spaces - it’s very odd

Re: [mssms] Upgrading Config Mgr

ing up nicely. I got the go-ahead to upgrade ADK today, but the server updates haven’t gone to the approval board yet. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Wednesday, December 13

Re: [mssms] Upgrading Config Mgr

You must be using lots of new features if you need a plan :) :) Run the pre-requ check that would tell you if 1702 to 1706 will work (it will) With quarterly updates I wouldn’t spend to long planning ! Backup and press go……. Stuart On 12 Dec 2017, at 18:07, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife mailto:jos

Re: [mssms] Redirect VPN clients traffic to IBCM servers !

What would be nice in this scenario, is the azure hosted mp/dp taking over, rather than the old world internet facing MP shnizzle. Just a thought. Stuart On 7 Dec 2017, at 05:54, Miriyala, Vasu mailto:vasu.miriy...@capgemini.com>> wrote: Thanks John I will try this Just want to reiterate to

Re: [mssms] Adding a list of users to a user collection

wesome, thanks. I’ll try that out. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 20, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Have to agree, our deployments are based on collections based on ad group member ships. It’s great. Stuart On 18 Nov 2017, at 03:51, Nemec, Dale mai

Re: [mssms] Adding a list of users to a user collection

Have to agree, our deployments are based on collections based on ad group member ships. It’s great. Stuart On 18 Nov 2017, at 03:51, Nemec, Dale mailto:dale.ne...@tektronix.com>> wrote: We use an Active Directory security group, and SCCM pulls the users from the security group. This is the C

Re: [mssms] November Patches 2008r2 and VMWare Guest

resolved, looks like a particular 3rd party service common to both of our affected boxes. > On 17 Nov 2017, at 11:04, Stuart Watret wrote: > > [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear > to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnA

[mssms] November Patches 2008r2 and VMWare Guest

Wondering if anyone else is seeing this? KB4048957/8960/7260 Got two VMWare guests that are now rebooting every couple of minutes after installing these patches and rebooting. Have removed the patches, but the issue remains. Eventlog has a graceful shutdown via LegacyAPI. Remove the NIC’s sto

[mssms] pre-provision bitlocker

Morning, I’m late to the pre-provision party, but just got it working in Config Manager for Win7. Obviously there isn’t a similar action available from the menu in MDT - so what’s the best way to do pre-provision of bit locker in MDT? Thanks Stuart

Re: [mssms] definition updates today

PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] definition updates today The think best practices is not to sync more than 3 times a day..Leverage some of the other sources for updates in unique situations. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stuart

Re: [mssms] definition updates today

:41 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Defender has been fine, Endpoint has downloaded no definition updates today. Anyone else seeing this? My wsus is set to sync every hour. Thanks Stuart

[mssms] definition updates today

Defender has been fine, Endpoint has downloaded no definition updates today. Anyone else seeing this? My wsus is set to sync every hour. Thanks Stuart

[mssms] RE: VPN / Cloud Based MP

mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 4:52 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] VPN / Cloud Based MP After a discussion on here i read some mor

[mssms] VPN / Cloud Based MP

can only think of one, where I might have deployed the InTune client before to keep tabs on an 'Off net’ machine. I’m wondering what your experience is and the scenarios around it? Thanks Stuart Watret

RE: [mssms] Moving away from image installation?

Wipe and load, but we are moving from Bios to Uefi, from x86 to x64 and over 80% of our apps are virtual. Stuart From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Tim Amico Sent: 05 October 2017 13:09 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Mov

RE: [mssms] Slow Console performance for some users

: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: 28 September 2017 15:24 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Slow Console performance for some users This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be

Re: [mssms] Slow Console performance for some users

because some worked ok. Will update further when I get the wii changes in detail. S. On 29 Sep 2017, at 08:23, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing<http

Re: [mssms] RE: Slow Console performance for some users

es, the more noticeable the slowdown. No RBA = no slowdown. I think that article may have a typo in it. Changing the compatibility level is easy to do, easy to test, and easily reversed. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myi

Re: [mssms] RE: Slow Console performance for some users

sn’t been accounted for (yet to my knowledge) in ConfigMgr. J -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 8:42 AM To: mssms@lists.myitf

Re: [mssms] RE: Slow Console performance for some users

istsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 8:42 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Slow Console performance for so

Re: [mssms] Slow Console performance for some users

Just had my colleague open the console with my reds, no issue. Shut down, opened as him, back to the donut. This is the section that hangs on Execute…. [cid:image001.png@01D3386D.3F1B70B0] On 28 Sep 2017, at 14:42, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: What I’m see

Re: [mssms] RE: Slow Console performance for some users

l Ratliff wrote: >> >> CAUTION: The e-mail below is from an EXTERNAL source. Please do not open >> attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin. >> >> >> >> Anything in smsprov.log? >> >> Daniel Ratliff >> >> -

[mssms] Slow Console performance for some users

, we have had them run the console on the server, the results are the same. If they drill down to a package, then click the program tab, they have the donut of doom, for a long time before it enumerates. This is repeatable. Any thoughts? Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] client upgrade reboots

I’ll run with that Joseph, thanks. Stuart Watret On 14 Sep 2017, at 14:33, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife mailto:joseph.hea...@wildlife.ca.gov>> wrote: Only thing I've seen recently is that upgrading from 1702 to 1702 hotfix cleared out the ccmcache, and caused machines to re-download,

[mssms] client upgrade reboots

Upgraded some clients from 1610 to 1706, a few have rebooted - its not a .Net install, and I’m struggling to find the reason why. Anyone else seen a similar thing? Stuart

[mssms] boot files / pxe /adk version

Hit an interesting issue, I’ve worked round it - but want a better understanding of it. CM box running 1610 Had an issue with drivers in the boot image, so updated idk and imported NIC drivers back into it. Assigned the new boot image to a few Task Sequences - got wind of an pxe issue when tec

Re: [mssms] Computer management for different vendors

tired of drivers that need installing later in a TS, I mean c’mon…… There you go. Stuart Watret On 31 Aug 2017, at 20:44, ben.sm...@everestre.com<mailto:ben.sm...@everestre.com> wrote: My company is looking at possibly changing computer vendors so I am just wonder what peoples experience

Re: [mssms] Updating BIOS during imaging.

Doing in winpe with HP - works ok. On 22 Aug 2017, at 00:05, Art Flores mailto:art_flo...@hotmail.com>> wrote: We run this script during our task sequence, it has been working fine for us, maybe someone could update the script to run in PoSH. http://www.dell.com/support/article/us/en/19/sln28

Re: [mssms] Migration Question / Software Centre Branding

client reinstall :) On 3 Aug 2017, at 18:17, Adam Juelich mailto:acjuel...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes, it should ;-) Does Resultant Client Settings show that the setting applies correctly? On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: 1610 to 17

Re: [mssms] Migration Question / Software Centre Branding

1610 to 1702. yes the clients are updated, it’s like sc doesn’t pickup colour changes post install - no biggy, just checking if it should. Stuart Watret On 3 Aug 2017, at 15:21, Adam Juelich mailto:acjuel...@gmail.com>> wrote: What version of ConfigMgr? The clients are updated? On Th

[mssms] Migration Question / Software Centre Branding

original plan) everything works, but no colour change in SC. I appreciate this isn’t the most important thing in the world, I’m just checking my observations are correct and normal. Ta Stuart Watret

[mssms] scep definitions failing since yesterday

rate. The error is "failed to install" 80070643. I'm still digging. Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] Anyone familar with this Health Script?

Anders, I’m correct that the only logging of results is via sql yes? Thanks Stuart On 15 Jun 2017, at 06:13, Anders Rødland mailto:anders.rodl...@atea.se>> wrote: Hi, I’m the author of this client health script, and I’m always happy to answer questions about it. I created it after we took in

Re: [mssms] RE: Windows 7 x86 failing to join domain

+ 1 on that, also had it where the easiest fix was a new ts. On 12 Jun 2017, at 17:09, Thelen, Chris mailto:chris.the...@dawnfoods.com>> wrote: I seen this a few years ago. It was due to specifying a specific OU in the apply network settings/domain join step. I took out the OU and we’ve neve

Re: [mssms] Static DPs

host entry should work, like any workgroup pc in sccm. S. On 16 May 2017, at 23:29, Richard Poole mailto:richard.po...@accountabilit.com>> wrote: That’s where it gets more fuzzy. These are workgroup PCs, so using AD to specify the secondary site is a no-go. Thank you, Richard Poole From: lis

Re: [mssms] new server / easy setup payload

>> wrote: you didn't explicitly state the sms_executive component, and yes, i did read the post. Restarting it shouldn't force you to wait 24 hours, it should check immediately once restarted. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>&g

Re: [mssms] new server / easy setup payload

, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Building a new server to migrate our CM site to. Built from 1606 media, 1606 hot fix arrived via servicing, 1610 sat downloading for days. Didn’t mind was migrating lots of jobs and doing other things. Looked back

[mssms] new server / easy setup payload

Building a new server to migrate our CM site to. Built from 1606 media, 1606 hot fix arrived via servicing, 1610 sat downloading for days. Didn’t mind was migrating lots of jobs and doing other things. Looked back to find 1702 also downloading, finally the one I want, so restarted the service

Re: [mssms] 2012 to 2016 upgrade with step issues

onth ago as well. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Someone on site did an in place upgrade of server 2012 r2 to 2016 server. Now defender and step are in a twist. I removed sccm, step and reinstalled sccm, this got defender back to be

[mssms] 2012 to 2016 upgrade with step issues

Someone on site did an in place upgrade of server 2012 r2 to 2016 server. Now defender and step are in a twist. I removed sccm, step and reinstalled sccm, this got defender back to being managed. He just came back to me to say step is back, sure enough defender is back to unmanaged. Anyone se

Re: [mssms] Adding Customized Branding /Tattoo to Image

Jason would missing the ID part make it fail? I just tried with just -wmi and -registry as the parameters and it just hung, I checked the reg after and no sign of anything. I gave up trying to run it in ps ise as i couldn’t work out how to pass a parameter and life is too short :) Ta Stuart

Re: [mssms] *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache

? Yes it was ! A snoop round google for hpqflash.exe and its treatment of bin files didn’t provide a definitive answer, but that is the observed behaviour it seems. Thanks all On 28 Feb 2017, at 23:58, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: This sender failed our

[mssms] RE: *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache

te content' [cid:image001.png@01D2921E.A3DA90D0] -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: 28 February 2017 23:07 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: *.bin files not being cop

[mssms] RE: *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache

-- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:45 AM To: Subject: [mssms] *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache is this a thing? I have an app in sccm 1607 / it has a *.bin file as part of the

[mssms] *.bin files not being copied to ccmcache

is this a thing? I have an app in sccm 1607 / it has a *.bin file as part of the content, when clients download to the ccmcache, it isn’t part of the download. Install fails……. Never come across it before, anyone else? Ta Stuart

RE: [mssms] clients offline

sad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 4:42 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] clients offline fine words, the truth for me is i only care if its online; not proving a

Re: [mssms] clients offline

>> on behalf of Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> Reply-To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>" mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>> Date: Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 5:21 AM To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com<

[mssms] RE: clients offline

More here: http://www.sparkhound.com/learn/blog/troubleshooting-client-online-status-in-sccm-1602 Suspect the idea was dreamt up by a millennial for whom ping is just too straight forward. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@W

[mssms] RE: clients offline

Client online status - Beginning in version 1602 of Configuration Manager, this status indicates if the computer is online or not. A computer is considered online if it is connected to it's assigned management point. To indicate that the client is online, it sends ping-like messages to the manag

Re: [mssms] RE: Bios to Uefi / hp

d line step in the ts with the package selected. Combined with the UEFI improvements in 1609 or better it’s working for me From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: den 2 februari 2

Re: [mssms] RE: Bios to Uefi / hp

uot; & PWDFile & chr(34) & " /cspwdfile:" & chr(34) & scriptdir & "\" & PWDFile & chr(34) /Mats From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: de

[mssms] Bios to Uefi / hp

Anyone successfully done this using HP’s biosconfigutility.exe? I’m following this doc, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/osd/deploy-use/task-sequence-steps-to-manage-bios-to-uefi-conversion Specifically I’m interested in your command line for HP kit :) Stuart

Re: [mssms] Patches (New Pardigm)

sts.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>> on behalf of Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2017 4:01 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms]

Re: [mssms] Endpoint Protection (SCEP) for servers

Make judicious use of role based collections and make sure your av exceptions are advertised correctly to these collections; otherwise the “Urrrg, av on servers gang” will be on your back like a limpet. Oh and plan your scans carefully. > On 13 Jan 2017, at 14:08, Adam Juelich wrote: > > Hell

Re: [mssms] Patches (New Pardigm)

en "oh, I have November and December already, moving on" Which is what you want to happen. If you want to avoid that, remove the superseded updates from your update group, so only the latest is available. On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co

[mssms] Patches (New Pardigm)

I try not to think about patching too much, I’ve been fairly successful. I thought the new patch paradigm was cumulative? I was refreshing a reference image in MDT yesterday, a couple of days after January’s patches were out. The screen cap below shows my client picking up Novembers patches, cl

Re: [mssms] Count physical disks

Thanks David, am I missing it, i don’t see anything relating to a count of physical disks per machine? Stuart Watret On 1 Dec 2016, at 14:46, David Jones mailto:dkjones9...@gmail.com>> wrote: sorry that wasn't very helpful without this. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM,

[mssms] Count physical disks

Anyone share a bit of query magic I can utilise to count disks in machines, that’s all I need. Cheers Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] removing scep help

bump Stuart Watret On 24 Nov 2016, at 11:58, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing> Feedback&l

[mssms] removing scep help

for inspiration first. Install results in 8004ff81 error. Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] Auto Client Upgrade

Until you complete the restart, the appropriate files are not in use, i.e. the client will not be fully functional. Stuart Watret (Director) Offshore IT Ltd stu...@offshore-it.co.uk<mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk> On 21 Nov 2016, at 03:58, Magnus Tveten mailto:magnus.tve...@iag.

Re: [mssms] Supersedence of Security Only Quality Updates

Nothing is normal in the new patch world, i still use wsus, this month i noticed the same behaviour; who knows what’s occurring. I’m just going to go with what it says and hope it’s right. No .Net updates this month either. S. On 8 Nov 2016, at 22:52, Hatem Mohamed mailto:hatem.i.moha...@gmai

[mssms] scep def version displayed in the sccm console

Hi, Where is the above getting updated from? H/W Inventory? Ta SW

Re: [mssms] scep updates not working

doh !! Ok, got it thanks. Stuart Watret On 28 Oct 2016, at 19:40, Jimmy Martin mailto:jimmy.mar...@bmhcc.org>> wrote: I was just saying use the script to DL the defs so you can create a package for them and deliver the defs via regular sccm package delivery From: l

Re: [mssms] scep updates not working

Great idea, thanks Mike :) Stuart Watret On 28 Oct 2016, at 17:25, Murray, Mike mailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu>> wrote: Maybe try this? It’s worked for us. Admin command prompt. "C:\Program Files\Windows Defender\MpCmdRun.exe" -removedefinitions -all "C:\Program F

Re: [mssms] scep updates not working

86S2, $x86D2) $wc.DownloadFile($x86S3, $x86D3) $wc.DownloadFile($x64S1, $x64D1) $wc.DownloadFile($x64S2, $x64D2) $wc.DownloadFile($x64S3, $x64D3) Jimmy Martin (901) 227-8209 -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@l

[mssms] scep updates not working

Since last Friday my clients haven’t ben picking up scep updates from WSUS. A manual update results in a 8004002e error. Only solution I’ve found is to remove scep and reinstall. I’ll do this, but thought I’d run it all past you in case of any bright ideas. Cheers Stuart

RE: [mssms] Rollup Patches naming.......

Great link, thanks; it will simplify my monthly work. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of tmerin...@gmail.com Sent: 21 October 2016 13:26 To: Stuart Watret; mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: AW: [mssms] Rollup Patches naming... This is

RE: [mssms] Rollup Patches naming.......

am. Other third party patching solutions, I don't know what their support of EIFs would be. Case by case basis, I assume. -Erik On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: First month, I had to re-read the blogs about what we could expect.

[mssms] Rollup Patches naming.......

-92C3-326758664788@fritz.box] Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] ccmexec calling http://crl.microsoft.com/pki blah blah

n List. Your security folks should know what >> that is any why it is important. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] >> On Behalf Of Stuart Watret >> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:

[mssms] ccmexec calling http://crl.microsoft.com/pki blah blah

In a sensitive area, I’m being asked why this is happening. Thoughts? Some kind of code/script signing check? Stuart

Re: [mssms] Configuration Manager Local SQL Best Practice Documentation

a fascinating account, first time I’ve seen a pro account for separating them; thanks. On 8 Sep 2016, at 16:12, Lindenfeld, Ivan mailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com>> wrote: Adding a couple of things I haven’t read in this thread… We have 25,000 clients. SCCM is virtualized, as I imagine most sit

Re: [mssms] Bitlocker recovery keys - MBAM console vs. AD

I’ve seen the following happen. Recovery key missing in AD = swap DC in ADUC and find it that time. One user can’t find recovery key, other user can = rights or gpo on an OU. We love it, always keeps people guessing. On 7 Sep 2016, at 16:54, Murray, Mike mailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu>> wrote:

[mssms] MDT Error - Unhandled Error ZTIDrivers

So, trying to understand why adding custom Format and Partition Disk steps is causing the unhandled ztidriver error. I had the first one use disk 0 / primary partition 100% and set OSDisk variable. It had a wmi query to skip if the model was a book 17 (so it runs for everyone else). Next one, w

Re: [mssms] MDT Driver oddness "Path not found"

but still has the error :) mac fell over mid email !! Stuart Watret (Director) Offshore IT Ltd stu...@offshore-it.co.uk<mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk> On 19 Aug 2016, at 16:37, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Alas no, found this on an old forum post, got e

[mssms] MDT Driver oddness "Path not found"

At the moment I have no display drivers under that model, it’s now come to the first one the is there, accelerometer.inf and the same error has occurred. Anyone seen this? [cid:EC0528F8-4AAF-43A0-9568-21284D83DF8D@fritz.box] Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

hread, but it is an option. It potentially leaves other vulnerabilities unpatched, which were addressed in the skipped bundle. Still, it's not as bad as some here seem to think. Steve On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: i think you

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

i think you are right, more unprotected systems will be the reality. It’s a terrible idea given the appalling qa testing done on patches; it seems every month we have an issue. On 16 Aug 2016, at 18:22, Erno, Cynthia M (ITS) mailto:cynthia.e...@its.ny.gov>> wrote: Oh I get it. So, when we fai

RE: [mssms] NAP & Windows 10

of course those may or may not be sufficient for your needs. Steve On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: So Windows 10 has no NAP client and it looks like NAP in general is on a slow walk out the door. We use NAP to control access to ou

Re: [mssms] RE: Slowness on the list

happens to me also, I post and yesterday it took hours, this morning 30mins. space time? On 11 Aug 2016, at 15:35, Ed Aldrich mailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com>> wrote: …but only happens if you are posting from Sweden. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto

[mssms] NAP & Windows 10

So Windows 10 has no NAP client and it looks like NAP in general is on a slow walk out the door. We use NAP to control access to our Corp Wifi, so we are looking for options. I’m going to assume, NAP in SCCM still needs a NAP client? If that is so, are any of you thinking of another method? Th

Re: [mssms] RE: MDT win10 1607 Cumulative Update - hanging like a fruit basket

> You need to use DISM to inject 3176929 into the image before suing it in the > TS. > > J > > -Original Message- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:

Re: [mssms] RE: MDT win10 1607 Cumulative Update - hanging like a fruit basket

; From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:06 AM > To: > Subject: [mssms] MDT win10 1607 Cumulative Update - hanging like a fruit > basket > > Hi, > Am I alone in this? > >

[mssms] MDT win10 1607 Cumulative Update - hanging like a fruit basket

Hi, Am I alone in this? New 1607 image, building in MDT, hangs on the Cumulative update for 1607. Tried adding it as a page in MDT and using the Apply Patches step - but still hanging on the wsus bit. Stuart

RE: [mssms] applications / packages

mailto:hupe...@outlook.com>> wrote: Provide details on the deployment settings > Op 22 jul. 2016 om 13:13 heeft Stuart Watret > mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> het volgende > geschreven: > > Maybe I’m expecting too much. > We are transitioning from Packages to

[mssms] applications / packages

Maybe I’m expecting too much. We are transitioning from Packages to Applications, I’ve just pushed our standard flash update out as an Application. Previously our Packages, didn’t use DP’s; it was quick and successful. I could normally crash through Flash/Air/Shockwave in an hour to between 4k a

RE: [mssms] Apps to user groups

Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Did a new app last night, new deployment to user collection with one account as a direct member. Sure enough nothing. Came in his morning it was there. Just removed the deployment, refreshed

Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups

end me the client logs offline. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 9:22 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re

Re: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups

orum.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Watret Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:58 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups Ok, new day. Arrived to find everything had arrived over the weekend. No server or client restarts, no evidence

Re: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups

later, nothing. I’ll leave it overnight - but why the delay deploying to users/groups when deploying to system is almost instant? Stuart On 8 Jul 2016, at 21:42, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: Thanks Adam, Our users are fairly static and less than 15% of our apps

RE: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups

, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Stuart Watret mailto:stu...@offshore-it.co.uk>> wrote: yep trying that now. > On 8 Jul 2016, at 14:49, Jason Sandys > mailto:ja...@sandys.us>> wrote: > > Also, user targeted apps always show up in App Catalog -- if you are using > the new softw

Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups

s well be > doing packages then. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 8:50 AM > To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com >

Re: [mssms] RE: Apps to user groups

are your requirement rules? Have you configured UDA? > > > > > -Original Message- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 6:45 AM > To: > Subject: [mssms] Apps to user group

Re: [mssms] Apps to user groups

myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Stuart Watret > Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 6:45 AM > To: > Subject: [mssms] Apps to user groups > > I appreciate this is 101 for most of you, and I assumed the same ! > > On 1602, and just moving from Packages to Applications (no laughing

[mssms] Apps to user groups

I appreciate this is 101 for most of you, and I assumed the same ! On 1602, and just moving from Packages to Applications (no laughing). Been through about 10 of our core pieces of software now running as “Applications" - all of them advertised to computer collections - all good. Done another t

  1   2   3   >