Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Here's a link to an improved diagram:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15663
That helps. And the diagram does omit how the xdpy# is generated to
even be available to ifd handler. This is the onl
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On 26/10/06, Michael Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you need to have different drivers for different zones
>> or DTUs?
Yes, we want to be able to give each instance of pcscd its own
set of ifd handlers, so that, for example, if an instance of pcscd
is running
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On 26/10/06, Michael Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Note that you can use IFDHGetCapabilities(...,
> SCARD_ATTR_VENDOR_IFD_TYPE, ...) (or another similar tag) to check
> that the IFD will understand the IFDHcontrol() request.
What happens if
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
It can still be a spoof.
The account may have been penetrated externally by a trojan,
The user at the console ends up loosing the display because
> his account has been taken over by some external means...
Don't forget this one:
The user might hav
On 26/10/06, Michael Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you need to have different drivers for different zones
>> or DTUs?
Yes, we want to be able to give each instance of pcscd its own
set of ifd handlers, so that, for example, if an instance of pcscd
is running in a Sun Ray session, it
On 26/10/06, Michael Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Note that you can use IFDHGetCapabilities(...,
> SCARD_ATTR_VENDOR_IFD_TYPE, ...) (or another similar tag) to check
> that the IFD will understand the IFDHcontrol() request.
What happens if you send an IFD an IFDHco
Paul Klissner wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Why do you have: "The IFD handler plugin directory location
>> specified in argv[]"?
The current thinking is to pass in a base directory
into argv[] where pcscd will find it's other configuration
files, such as reader.conf, and what, by default,
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
I think it is better to use IFDHcontrol(). At least the communication
is more explicit.
I agree.
Note that you can use IFDHGetCapabilities(...,
SCARD_ATTR_VENDOR_IFD_TYPE, ...) (or another similar tag) to check
that the IFD will understand the IFDHcontrol() request.
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On 25/10/06, Paul Klissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just in time for another diagram update:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15920
Why do you have: "The IFD handler plugin directory location specified
in argv[]"?
Do you need to have different dri
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
On 25/10/06, Paul Klissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just in time for another diagram update:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15920
Instead of putenv(), the goal now is to use IFDHcontrol() to
pass a new control code designed can be tolerated by all
On 25/10/06, Paul Klissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just in time for another diagram update:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15920
Why do you have: "The IFD handler plugin directory location specified
in argv[]"?
Do you need to have different drivers for different zones
On 25/10/06, Paul Klissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just in time for another diagram update:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15920
Instead of putenv(), the goal now is to use IFDHcontrol() to
pass a new control code designed can be tolerated by all
IFD Handlers to pass in
Michael Bender wrote:
Jesse I Pollard wrote:
(about 50,000,000,000,000 lines of text)
Paul Klissner wrote:
(another 50,000,000,000,000 lines of text)
Geeze guys! I go away for a weekend to Tahoe and you guys write
War and Peace on the MUSCLE list :-).
I'll read everything that was wr
Jesse I Pollard wrote:
(about 50,000,000,000,000 lines of text)
Paul Klissner wrote:
(another 50,000,000,000,000 lines of text)
Geeze guys! I go away for a weekend to Tahoe and you guys write
War and Peace on the MUSCLE list :-).
I'll read everything that was written but it will take
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
therefore, the process doing the putenv would have a valid zone, and
a spoofed dpy#.
I'm talking about Solaris Containers (aka. Zones), which is part of
Solaris 10 and documented on the Internet. I think you are using
Zones as a different kind of abstraction.
-
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Jesse I
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Here's a link to an improved diagram:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15663
That helps. And the diagram does omi
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Here's a link to an improved diagram:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15663
That helps. And the diagram does omit how the xdpy# is generated to
even
BTW: I made a few changes based on your feedback.
The web hosting site forced me to change the URL to
access it, here:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15879
Unfortunately, I can't include all of the details step-by-step
in the diagram. Hopefully it won't be too much of a has
Jesse I Pollard - CONTRACTOR wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Here's a link to an improved diagram:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15663
That helps. And the diagram does omit how the xdpy# is generated to
even be available to ifd handler. This is the onl
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Paul Klissner wrote:
Here's a link to an improved diagram:
http://www.freemyimage.com/ims/pic.php?u=1500BLfhm&i=15663
That helps. And the diagram does omit how the xdpy# is generated to
even be available to ifd handler. This is the only weakness I see.
The ifd and pcscd
21 matches
Mail list logo
