regarding track time difference - this is a problem with all disc ids.
ie, every seperate pressing of a CD will likely have different track
times.
i think it is a continuing problem that we currently can't apply
individual attributes/release dates to disc id.
On 01/02/06, Simon Reinhardt [EMAIL
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:34:21 +0100, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
I need some clarification about promo releases. Maybe we can even
formulate something for the wiki.
The problem: some users seem to have access to promo releases before an
album comes out. If the tracklistings differ then it is
Don Redman wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:34:21 +0100, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
I need some clarification about promo releases. Maybe we can even
formulate something for the wiki.
The problem: some users seem to have access to promo releases before
an album comes out. If the
On 01/02/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the reasons not to enter them as separate albums with the
attributes album promotinal?
seems a bit pointless when we don't even seperate different media
releases - cd/vinyl/tape/etc, unless they are musically different. IMO
track length
A lot of material marked as promotional are simply pre-release copies
intended for retail and radio play prior to release and there is no
difference at all between it the actual release. Other items such as mailer
and instore copies should be considered Promotional since they are only
available
Don Redman wrote:
Lukas, you seem to push for that.
Yes, I do. That's because *every* single AR type I've ever proposed here already
was proposed (and discussed) somewhere else and then successfully forgotten.
Can you please write up three short descriptions (that will then come
into the
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our
mailing lists and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to
make vocal type optional, so that we can use ARs to say
Artist performed vocal on Track/Album.
I've already changed it on the test server. Here is an example:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:35:44 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our mailing lists
and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to make vocal type optional,
so that we can use ARs to say Artist performed vocal on Track/Album.
I've already changed
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:24:28 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Don Redman wrote:
Lukas, you seem to push for that.
Yes, I do. That's because *every* single AR type I've ever proposed here
already was proposed (and discussed) somewhere else and then
successfully forgotten.
Can you please
Don Redman wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:35:44 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our mailing lists
and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to make vocal type
optional, so that we can use ARs to say Artist performed vocal on
Track/Album.
Don Redman wrote:
Also, is Librettist not a special case of Lyricist?
Sorry, I don't know, I didn't add nor propse this AR type.
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
