Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to grou p releases into “cultural identifiers” for future im porting.

2008-10-10 Thread Bram van Dijk
I might be wrong, but if there is a box set, for example the pink floyd shine on set, we do use earliest release or remaster ARs to link them to the original albums. But, I don't think that they should be in the same cultural identifier. Bram (jongetje) Jan van Thiel schreef: Why is this

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to grou p releases into “cultural identifiers” for fu ture importing.

2008-10-10 Thread david scotson
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Bram van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I might be wrong, but if there is a box set, for example the pink floyd shine on set, we do use earliest release or remaster ARs to link them to the original albums. But, I don't think that they should be in the same

[mb-style] RFV: Part of series relationship

2008-10-10 Thread Johannes Dewender
Hello, Similary to the set AR I would like to see a series AR. Series have quite similar properties. The last comment on the corresponding RFC is more than two weeks old, so I start a RFV for the series AR. The text ist mostly the same as for the RFC, but I fixed the wording to be more

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to grou p releases into “cultural identifiers” for fu ture importing.

2008-10-10 Thread david scotson
I think this is a good idea, but also mostly agree with this: On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Jan van Thiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is this needed at all? 'Earliest release of' and 'Remaster of' ARs can be taken advantage of right now if you write some software. This new AR will be

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for future imp orting.

2008-10-10 Thread Kerensky97
I only know about these Cultural Identifiers from what little I got from discussing with Robert in chat about it. I can't say for sure what the finished NGS product will be so that we can accurately discuss them now. (I'll try to hound Robert to make a post in here) But from what I

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for future imp orting.

2008-10-10 Thread Kerensky97
Kuno Woudt-2 wrote: Hello, Generally, sounds like a good idea. I'm in favour :). One question... On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:58:31PM -0700, Kerensky97 wrote: *Some existing ARs a re already similar to grouping by “Cultural Identifiers”. Namely “Remasters”, and “Later Release”.

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to grou p releases into “cultural identifiers” for fu ture importing.

2008-10-10 Thread Bogdan Butnaru
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Kerensky97 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Big huge reminder here. Like I said this is not a typical AR. It will NOT sit alongside existing 'Earliest release of' and 'Remaster of' ARs or any other ARs for that matter. Nor will it replace them. [...] Furthermore,

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Creating a non-code AR to group rele ases into “cultural identifiers” for fut ure importing.

2008-10-10 Thread Kuno Woudt
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:53:14PM -0700, Kerensky97 wrote: Earliest Release of: I think most of these would apply for being grouped with Cultural Identifiers. Its basically the same release from a different date and possibly a few more tracks, which as I understand is the main point of a