Hello,
I heard about this RFC (request for comments?) through the chatlogger.
http://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz/2010/2010-11/2010-11-28.html#T00-33-10-62241
To start with, I would like to say that, even if Hepburn was created with
the english readers in mind, I would agree any
+1 to using the publicly attributed credit. I can see how having the
various bits of other information available would be cool, but I think
it would be infinitely simpler to open what seems a likely can of
worms. I think the benefit is not worth the additional complication.
-Mark / InSinU8
On
The RFC period for this proposal[1] has passed, and so it moves on to
RFV. The RFV period will end on Wednesday, 2010-12-1.
Since the opening of the RFC, some text was added to explain in more
detail where and when to use the non-generic punctuation characters.
Some text was taken from Paul
Hmm... I have a couple of issues with it at the moment.
I don't understand what the ditto mark is doing there... It's not a
quotation mark and where exactly would we use it anyway?
I think saying to use dashes as they appear on the release doesn't work.
It makes sense to say that for quotes,
On 11/29/2010 12:12 PM, Nikki wrote:
Hmm... I have a couple of issues with it at the moment.
I don't understand what the ditto mark is doing there... It's not a
quotation mark and where exactly would we use it anyway?
Because it’s one of those items for which a neutral quotation mark would
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
In hip hop, it is usual that the person who creates the music is
credited as producer. In some electronic music records the person who
creates the music is also credited as producer, while in
Alex Mauer wrote:
On 11/29/2010 12:12 PM, Nikki wrote:
Hmm... I have a couple of issues with it at the moment.
I don't understand what the ditto mark is doing there... It's not a
quotation mark and where exactly would we use it anyway?
Because it’s one of those items for which a
