The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where with is being used in lowercase as a connector in artist
credits. Should we have a policy one way or the other for this?
--Torc.
On 07/11/2011 09:27 PM, Yin Izanami wrote:
It may be that a single work isn't supposed to have multiple ISWC
codes, but in reality I believe it is the case that many single works
do in fact have multiple ISWC codes.
I've been searching the ASCAP database
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Aurélien Mino a.m...@free.fr wrote:
On 07/11/2011 09:27 PM, Yin Izanami wrote:
It may be that a single work isn't supposed to have multiple ISWC
codes, but in reality I believe it is the case that many single works
do in fact have multiple ISWC codes.
I've
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Johannes Weißl jar...@molb.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:55:02PM +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Sounds good, I guess we'd make most special purpose artists into other.
What about the attributes for the Other type? Any suggestions? Should
these be
2011/7/11, Paul C. Bryan pbr...@anode.ca:
Three examples:
1. Remasters take original source material, transfer those to digital
medium, with levels typically adjusted¹ (often to the detriment of the
recording's dynamic range), then use this new master recording as the
basis for releases. In
Ryan Torchia wrote:
The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where with is being used in lowercase as a connector in
artist
credits. Should we have a policy one way or the other for
Hello Nicolás,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:42:22AM +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
IPI code: Can non-groups/non-persons have an IPI code? If not, this
can be greyed out.
Labels do have an IPI code, and there are a few cases where we need to
add them as artists now (for
I don't know why you can't see them. I just reproduced it easily.
Pokemon Advanced:
Work ID: 460645883, ISWC: T0726736339
Work ID: 460601563, ISWC: T0726733807
Work ID: 460591422, ISWC: T0726733181
Unbeatable:
Work ID: 461643534, ISWC: T0727508191
Work ID: 510692156, ISWC: T9057933490
Work ID:
Just in case it wasn't clear - Arrangement relationship can't be attached at
the Work level in Musicbrainz. hence why they aren't new Musicbrainz works.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Yin Izanami yind...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know why you can't see them. I just reproduced it easily.
Actually I know of a couple cases where fictional characters are assigned
composition credits. _Maybe_ with research the real people could be
discovered, but it's also possible you wouldn't find anything.
e.g.,
http://musicbrainz.org/artist/c6eda16b-1cc1-4c82-8ab7-50a18aac5791/relationships
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Yin Izanami yind...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I know of a couple cases where fictional characters are assigned
composition credits. _Maybe_ with research the real people could be
discovered, but it's also possible you wouldn't find anything.
e.g.,
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:42 +0300, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Johannes Weißl jar...@molb.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:55:02PM +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Sounds good, I guess we'd make most special purpose artists into other.
What about
I just checked these, in CISAC they appear as:
T-072.673.318-1
POKEMON ADVANCED, alternate titles: POKEMON BUMPER, ICH WILL EIN SEIN
This one is a short version used as a commercial bumper on TV.
T-072.673.380-7
POKEMON ADVANCE OPENING THEME
Opening theme version.
T-072.673.633-9
POKEMON
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 08:35 +0200, Aurélien Mino wrote:
On 07/11/2011 09:27 PM, Yin Izanami wrote:
It may be that a single work isn't supposed to have multiple ISWC
codes, but in reality I believe it is the case that many single works
do in fact have multiple ISWC codes.
I've been
I've written a proposal for handling featured artists post-NGS:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Featured_Artists
This deals with the legacy data issue (ws/1 still provides data in
pre-NGS format) by retaining the existing guideline for track
listings, while making use of artist credits at
Am 11.07.2011, 21:31 Uhr, schrieb Yin Izanami yind...@gmail.com:
As long as mastering/mixing/engineering relationships apply to the
Recording
level, and can't be moved to a Track/Tracklist level (Release level
doesn't
work, because each recording could have different involved people),
On 12 July 2011 16:02, Lemire, Sebastien m...@benji99.ca wrote:
Hi Andii,
Two points:
1.) I'm not personally a fan of the (feat. xxx) style for track titles, I'd
much prefer that that information be dynamically generated and displayed
while keeping the track title only having the track title.
On 12 July 2011 09:17, jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Ryan Torchia wrote:
The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where with is being used in lowercase as a connector in
On 07/12/2011 04:45 PM, Andii Hughes wrote:
I've written a proposal for handling featured artists post-NGS:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Featured_Artists
This deals with the legacy data issue (ws/1 still provides data in
pre-NGS format) by retaining the existing guideline for track
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Aurélien Mino a.m...@free.fr wrote:
On 07/12/2011 04:45 PM, Andii Hughes wrote:
I've written a proposal for handling featured artists post-NGS:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Featured_Artists
This deals with the legacy data issue (ws/1 still provides
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Andii Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org wrote:
I've written a proposal for handling featured artists post-NGS:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Featured_Artists
This deals with the legacy data issue (ws/1 still provides data in
pre-NGS format) by retaining
Ryan Torchia wrote:
The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where with is being used in lowercase as a connector in artist
credits. Should we have a policy one way or the other for
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
simon.reinha...@koeln.de wrote:
Ryan Torchia wrote:
The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where with is being used in lowercase as a
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:55, Yin Izanami yind...@gmail.com wrote:
Date period: I'm not sure this should be allowed for fictional characters.
Nothing bothers me more than going to Musicbrainz' Ranka Lee artist page
and seeing Born: 2044 (-32 years ago).
If this proposal is approved, it's
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
simon.reinha...@koeln.de wrote:
Ryan Torchia wrote:
The capitalization standard for English requires the word with be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where
Am 12.07.2011, 10:17 Uhr, schrieb jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com:
My rationale for lowercase is that with is akin to extra title
information
[1]; it is not part of an artist's title, but acts as descriptive text.
+1
--
lorenz pressler
PGP 0x92E9551A
It's been more than 48 hours, so this has passed.
Nikki
Michael Wiencek wrote:
The RFV will replace the multiple titles style page[1] with this one:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Multiple_titles
The added text mentions the Compilation Relationship, and also says to use a
/
Michael Wiencek wrote:
If possible, after this RFV I'd like to just update that page with the
example, and replace track with recording, without having to make
another proposal (since those changes are trivial and obvious to me).
That's fine, please do so (track should be replaced with
28 matches
Mail list logo
