Re: [mb-style] Locations and the upcoming schema change

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:46:43PM -0600, Rachel Dwight wrote: > Looks awesome to me. The only commentary I have is what I imagine such a > system would look like: a multi-tiered drop-down menu system with selectable > milestones in the artist's life and "Add Another" buttons for both menus. > Am

Re: [mb-style] Locations and the upcoming schema change

On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:27 PM, Ian McEwen wrote: > Hi everyone; I'm one of the MB devs, for anyone who doesn't know me already. > > I'd like to get a bit of feedback on some points of a patch I'm working on > for the upcoming May 15 schema change, improving location support. > > If you'd like m

[mb-style] Locations and the upcoming schema change

Hi everyone; I'm one of the MB devs, for anyone who doesn't know me already. I'd like to get a bit of feedback on some points of a patch I'm working on for the upcoming May 15 schema change, improving location support. If you'd like more complete details, please see http://tickets.musicbrainz.o

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

I've updated the text, I hope it is clearer now. /symphonick ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Rachel Dwight > wrote: > >> >> On Mar 4, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < >> reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, symphonick wrote: >> >>> 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight >>>

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Rachel Dwight > wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, symphonick wrote: >> 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight >> Yea

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Rachel Dwight wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < > reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, symphonick wrote: > >> 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight >> >>> Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where t

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Mar 4, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, symphonick wrote: > 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight > Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original > creator(s) brought someone else in. > > I'm just assuming that would be a

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Add "Soundtrack" work type

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Dainis Jonitis wrote: > Hello, > > Some time passed since RFC was sent and the feedback was mostly > positive. Proceeding to RFV stage. Expected time of passing is 2013-03-07 in the UTC morning. -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:57 PM, symphonick wrote: > 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight > >> Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original >> creator(s) brought someone else in. >> > > I'm just assuming that would be a rare case? Writer Foo writes work > Rhubarb, and some years later

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

Sent from my iPhone On Mar 4, 2013, at 12:57 PM, symphonick wrote: > 2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight >> Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original >> creator(s) brought someone else in. > > I'm just assuming that would be a rare case? Writer Foo writes work Rhubarb, > and

[mb-style] RFV: Add "Soundtrack" work type

Hello, Some time passed since RFC was sent and the feedback was mostly positive. Proceeding to RFV stage. P.S. The argument that we have too many works is not yet a problem - they easily fit in one screen. And since most of them apply only to CSG I would actually expect that in future we can have

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Rachel Dwight > Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original > creator(s) brought someone else in. > I'm just assuming that would be a rare case? Writer Foo writes work Rhubarb, and some years later brings in writer Bar to update the work. Or do you have an exam

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Sheamus Patt > > Your ticket says '(only for classical)' though. Do you expect it to be > used for pop songs like this? > > Oops, had forgotten about the ticket. Edited. /symphonick ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.mu

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On 03/04/2013 05:24 AM, symphonick wrote: 2013/3/3 Sheamus Patt > On 02/28/2013 05:53 AM, symphonick wrote: > Update. Did anyone have a good example of revised lyrics? You might consider Elton John's song Candle in the Wind, lyrics by Bernie Taupi

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On 03/04/2013 10:51 AM, symphonick wrote: > How about "the original artist"? or "artist(s)" > "Candle in the Wind" has more than a single creator. Hmm, I think to a lot of people that would mean whoever first performed it, rather than whoever wrote it (musics and/or lyrics). Often they’re the same

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

Yeah, that sounds about right, except in instances where the original creator(s) brought someone else in. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:51 AM, symphonick wrote: > 2013/3/4 Alex Mauer >> On 3/4/2013 4:24 AM, symphonick wrote: >> > Great! Proposal updated. Can I get a +1 ? >> >> On

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Alex Mauer > On 3/4/2013 4:24 AM, symphonick wrote: > > Great! Proposal updated. Can I get a +1 ? > > One very minor change: > > "different revisions of a work by one single artist": "one single" is > redundant. I would suggest "the original writer" I think, for this. > > Other possibili

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On 3/4/2013 4:24 AM, symphonick wrote: > Great! Proposal updated. Can I get a +1 ? One very minor change: "different revisions of a work by one single artist": "one single" is redundant. I would suggest "the original writer" I think, for this. Other possibilities: * "a single artist" (implies t

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 symphonick > > 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > >> >> How_Works_Are_Related or How_To_Relate_Works ? Anyhow, my RFC is not out >> yet and we have we have until the RFV to decide :-) >> >> > BTW if someone wants to see a RFV for _this_ proposal, I going to need a > +1 ;-) > Here it comes:

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Add "Soundtrack" work type

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dainis Jonitis wrote: > Hello, > > Proposal is to add "Soundtrack" work type for movies/theater plays and > musicals. It should be possible to use it: > 1. As a placeholder. When no individual songs within movie are > named/specified then we just express that comp

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > > How_Works_Are_Related or How_To_Relate_Works ? Anyhow, my RFC is not out > yet and we have we have until the RFV to decide :-) > > BTW if someone wants to see a RFV for _this_ proposal, I going to need a +1 ;-) /symphonick

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria > wrote: > >> 2013/3/4 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren >> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria >> > wrote: >>> 2013/3/4 symphonick > 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > >>>

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2013/3/4 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria >> wrote: >> >>> 2013/3/4 symphonick >>> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > 2013/3/4 symphonick > >> 2013/3/4 Frederic

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria > wrote: > >> 2013/3/4 symphonick >> >>> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria >>> 2013/3/4 symphonick > 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > >> >> I wonder about "Revising music can include

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2013/3/4 symphonick > >> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria >> >>> 2013/3/4 symphonick >>> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > > I wonder about "Revising music can include arranging. Do not use > another "version of"-relat

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 symphonick > 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > >> 2013/3/4 symphonick >> >>> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria >>> I wonder about "Revising music can include arranging. Do not use another "version of"-relationship at the same time as revision." I understand the second sent

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > 2013/3/4 symphonick > >> 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria >> >>> >>> I wonder about "Revising music can include arranging. Do not use another >>> "version of"-relationship at the same time as revision." I understand the >>> second sentence, but I am unsure about the f

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 symphonick > 2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > >> >> I wonder about "Revising music can include arranging. Do not use another >> "version of"-relationship at the same time as revision." I understand the >> second sentence, but I am unsure about the first. > > > It was originally "do not us

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 Frederic Da Vitoria > > I wonder about "Revising music can include arranging. Do not use another > "version of"-relationship at the same time as revision." I understand the > second sentence, but I am unsure about the first. It was originally "do not use "has arrangement" or another "v

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/4 symphonick > 2013/3/3 Sheamus Patt > >> On 02/28/2013 05:53 AM, symphonick wrote: >> > Update. Did anyone have a good example of revised lyrics? >> >> You might consider Elton John's song Candle in the Wind, lyrics by >> Bernie Taupin, which famously was revised as a tribute to Diana, >

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Revision Works

2013/3/3 Sheamus Patt > On 02/28/2013 05:53 AM, symphonick wrote: > > Update. Did anyone have a good example of revised lyrics? > > You might consider Elton John's song Candle in the Wind, lyrics by > Bernie Taupin, which famously was revised as a tribute to Diana, > Princess of Wales, in 1997 >