Relationship added. Type will be added when the devs are around. Please
update http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Label/Type in the meantime :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship types.
Balance engineers are often named in classical releases and just entering
them as engineer seems to be losing valuable information.
Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-290
See also:
On 27.1.2014 18:05, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship types.
Balance engineers are often named in classical releases and just
entering them as engineer seems to be losing valuable information.
+1 for this RFC.
--
ListMyCDs / Timo
2014-01-27 ListMyCDs musicbra...@listmycds.com
On 27.1.2014 18:05, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship types.
Balance engineers are often named in classical releases and just
entering them as engineer seems to be losing valuable
Not meaning to be a wet blanket, but Ive just managed to located one of my
CDs (Deutsche Gramophon) that does translate Tonmeister into other
languages. The results are most unfortunate!
Before the name of the engineer being credited is this quadrilingual
statement:
Tonmeister /
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-01-27 Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net
Not meaning to be a wet blanket, but I’ve just managed to located one of
my CDs (Deutsche Gramophon) that does translate Tonmeister into other
languages. The results
2014-01-27 Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net
Not meaning to be a wet blanket, but I’ve just managed to located one of
my CDs (Deutsche Gramophon) that does translate Tonmeister into other
languages. The results are most unfortunate!
Before the name of the engineer being credited is this
2014-01-27 Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-01-27 ListMyCDs musicbra...@listmycds.com
On 27.1.2014 18:05, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship
types.
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-01-27 ListMyCDs musicbra...@listmycds.com
On 27.1.2014 18:05, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship types.
Balance engineers are often named in classical releases and
2014-01-27 Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net
On checking some more of my European label CDs
I find I have two Archiv CDs that credit a particular engineer twice on
the same CD, once as “Tonmeister (Balance Engineer)” and once as “Recording
Engineer”, so clearly they regard those as
That was a pattern I was noticing, and it had made me wonder if there might
simply be less categorization of such terms in French
The one Erato disc I have to hand just credits someone in English only as
Sound Engineer, and my one CD on the K617 label gives no technical credits
at all as far
2014-01-27 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-01-27 Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net
Not meaning to be a wet blanket, but I’ve just managed to located one of
my CDs (Deutsche Gramophon) that
On checking some more of my European label CDs
I find I have two Archiv CDs that credit a particular engineer twice on the
same CD, once as Tonmeister (Balance Engineer) and once as Recording
Engineer, so clearly they regard those as distinct roles (although DG
doesnt)
On an EMI
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
and see if he clarifies it :)
Don't proposals require at least a +1 from someone other than the proposer?
In this
On 27 Jan 2014 20:39, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically
said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
and see if he clarifies it :)
Don't proposals
On 01/27/2014 07:39 PM, drsaunde wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
and see if he clarifies it :)
Don't proposals require at least a +1 from
On 01/27/2014 03:20 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Relationship added. Type will be added when the devs are around. Please
update http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Label/Type in the meantime :)
Done.
I may have strayed a bit into -style territory with the “Imprint vs.
Company” section, but I
So, any strong opposition to move USB and slotMusic under Other instead?
I'll give it a couple more days (until the 30 or so) and RFV if I have
received at least a +1 for this specific change and no strong opposition :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
On 1/27/2014 6:02 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
So, any strong opposition to move USB and slotMusic under Other
instead? I'll give it a couple more days (until the 30 or so) and RFV if
I have received at least a +1 for this specific change and no strong
opposition :)
+1
27 januari 2014, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com skrev:This RFC is to add Balance engineer to the Engineer relationship types. Balance engineers are often named in classical releases and just entering them as "engineer" seems to be losing valuable information.Well, we would lose some
20 matches
Mail list logo
