On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:30:13PM +0200, Don Redman wrote:
>
> Does this mean that in fact Billboard's Top whatever is nothing but a
> *playlist*.
In this case, yes. Billboard distributes it (for money either online
or in books) as just a list of songs, or in the case of the books with
some a
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> Note that popularity _of the torrent_ was not the originally-proposed
> criterion. Instead the popularity _of the compilation_ was cited.
> (Although, a torrent compilation that has tens of thousands of
> downloads might be considere
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:21:42PM +0200, Don Redman wrote:
> Hmm, there has not been a lot of response to my request. Strange thing,
> since a lot of people voted.
Well there was a bit of discussion before your posting, and I think
(at least for me) that people felt they said enough and didn't
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:43:05AM +0200, Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> How can we then look at a collection of all the songs in one of
> Billboard's (*) tops and dismiss it as a "homebrew" just because it
> was not released on a physical bootleg CD from Russia(**), but
> through a torrent? I have seen
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +0200, Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> I do remember at some point the rules mentioned that, but I can't find
> it anymore. What is our policy? And may I suggest making the docs a
> bit more clear? (After I see some answers, I can change the wiki, but
> the [4] popup I th
