On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Bogdan Butnaru wrote: > Note that popularity _of the torrent_ was not the originally-proposed > criterion. Instead the popularity _of the compilation_ was cited. > (Although, a torrent compilation that has tens of thousands of > downloads might be considered "useful for our users".)
Rolling Stone Magazine torrents: http://www.torrentz.com/torrent_350589.html Yes, "disc 1" of 5, presumably, since there is a top-500 list from Rolling Stone. There are probably 4 other torrents running around to complete that list. Ah and we should also have this one: http://www.torrentz.com/torrent_448378.html It's a different "release" in that it has all 500 in one torrent... (a "fivefer"?) Rolling Stone almost certainly outsells Billboard, ie, is "more popular". Of course, I don't think this should be in Musicbrainz either, but once the floodgates are opened... _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
