Dňa Št, 2008-07-31 o 10:32 -0700, Robert Kaye napísal:
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
>
> > So, if we really want to migrate to MediaWiki, I'd sugges to not
> > upgrade
> > to MoinMoin 1.6, but go straight to MediaWiki.
>
>
> Do you want to load the results onto scooby so
On Jul 31, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> So, if we really want to migrate to MediaWiki, I'd sugges to not
> upgrade
> to MoinMoin 1.6, but go straight to MediaWiki.
Do you want to load the results onto scooby so everyone can play with
the results? I can have DW add a new DNS ent
Lukáš Lalinský a écrit :
> Dňa Št, 2008-07-31 o 12:20 +0200, "Aurélien.mino" napísal:
>
>> Chad Wilson a écrit :
>>
>>> Do we understand why Moin was chosen in the first place above MediaWiki?
>>> Do we have an idea of whether it will fix some of the transclusion
>>> display problems with
Dňa Št, 2008-07-31 o 12:20 +0200, "Aurélien.mino" napísal:
> Chad Wilson a écrit :
> > Do we understand why Moin was chosen in the first place above MediaWiki?
> > Do we have an idea of whether it will fix some of the transclusion
> > display problems with Moin pages?
> >
> > I am concerned that
Robert Kaye a écrit :
> If MediaWiki can be used for transclusion, I'm all for the switch.
>
>
Transclusion can probably be achieved with MediaWiki as well:
it supports extensions, and here's one allowing to export a wiki page as
PDF: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Pdf_Export,
which ma
Chad Wilson a écrit :
> Do we understand why Moin was chosen in the first place above MediaWiki?
> Do we have an idea of whether it will fix some of the transclusion
> display problems with Moin pages?
>
> I am concerned that to do a migration while the data is in a bad state
> may detract from
Aurélien Mino wrote:
>
>
> BTW, I figured nearly one year ago that we should migrate to MediaWiki,
> because it may better fits our needs (true categories support, advanced
> templates (Moin cards are limited), native discussion page for each
> "article", namespaces).
> However I feel disco
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking, making a plan of how to proceed will be a lot easier, if
>> we really understand what we've already got.
>>
>> If you think this is a good idea, I'm willing to take it on (and if I
>> take it on, I'm obviously willing to
On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm thinking, making a plan of how to proceed will be a lot easier, if
> we really understand what we've already got.
>
> If you think this is a good idea, I'm willing to take it on (and if I
> take it on, I'm obviously willing to add other '
On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:00 AM, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> I didn't know about such an idea. If people think MediaWiki would
> really
> work better for us, I'm willing to at least try to do the work.
The most important thing to consider about moving to a new wiki is
that we can add a plugin to re
On 7/30/08, Chad Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also agreed. I think this is part of a larger problem -- our overall
>> docs are in disarray and could benefit from someone taking an active
>> role as Documentation Chief and cleaning house a bit. We've also lost
>> some WikiWardens who were d
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dňa St, 2008-07-30 o 11:54 +0200, "Aurélien.mino" napísal:
> > BTW, I figured nearly one year ago that we should migrate to MediaWiki,
> > because it may better fits our needs (true categories support, advanced
> > templa
Dňa St, 2008-07-30 o 11:54 +0200, "Aurélien.mino" napísal:
> Chad Wilson a écrit :
> > - Where is the MoinMoin upgrade stuff at?
> In the hand of djce & dmppanda. I don't have more info.
>
> BTW, I figured nearly one year ago that we should migrate to MediaWiki,
> because it may better fits our n
Chad Wilson a écrit :
> The issue at the moment is that the problem is too big. I think we need a
> streamlined process for a period of time to try and clean out the bulk of the
> old/outdated crud so that the time can gradually be spent more on
> maintenance/improving/reviewing rather than rest
> I agree with everything you've said -- I think you're certainly on the
> right track. I'm ready to declare Jim as the new style leader? Does
> anyone have any objections? If so, speak up now!
I also completely agree with most of Jim's points as well; well thought out,
well written and even
15 matches
Mail list logo
