Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-10 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Hi! I'm restarting this RFC, because as suggested, I've made changes to the Chorus Master page too. What do people think of http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Chorus_Master_Relationship_Type and http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Conductor_Relationship_Type ? (I've also added

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-10 Thread jonitis
+1 From: Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎April‎ ‎10‎, ‎2013 ‎7‎:‎44‎ ‎PM To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion Hi! I'm restarting this RFC, because as suggested, I've made changes to the Chorus Master page too. What do people think of

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-10 Thread Tom Crocker
I would change the link phrases for chorus master because I think they're a little clunky: Artist http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Artist *was chorus master on* Releasehttp://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release Release http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release *has chorus master

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-10 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.comwrote: I would change the link phrases for chorus master because I think they're a little clunky: Artist http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Artist *was chorus master on* Releasehttp://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release Release

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-10 Thread David Gasaway
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.comwrote: I would change the link phrases for chorus master because I think they're a little clunky: Artist http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Artist *was chorus master on* Releasehttp://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Release Release

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-04 Thread Dainis Jonitis
+1 I suggest to have more than one sparse sentence in MB doc pages with polished wording that only those who follow style guidelines forum can understand. Normal users will only benefit if we can clearly see what to do when artist is credited as conductor, as chorus master, when both roles are

[mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-03 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Salutaurs in http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21512 just pointed out that the current conductor page says chorus master should be used for choral conductors: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Conductor_Relationship_Type That's just wrong I'd say - many choirs have both positions, and many

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-205: Remove indication in conductor guidelines to use chorus master for choral conductors

2013-04-03 Thread Alex Mauer
On 04/03/2013 04:10 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: That's just wrong I'd say - many choirs have both positions, and many releases have a credit for the conductor and a credit for the choir master. So I'm proposing to change that line to Chorus Master Relationship Type should be used