requesting vetos on this one. anyone?
On 10/04/06, Chris Bransden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what's happening with this one? i reckon it's good to go, but there's
a discussion on the wiki people might want to read -
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType
On 28/03/06, Don Redman
On 12/04/06, Cristov Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Veto. IMO this is over engineered (pun intended). There is no clear guidance
on the difference between sound vs. audio and we are putting mix here
when we also have RemixerRelationshipType which is very much related to the
descriptions
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:22:40 +0200, Chris Bransden wrote:
On 12/04/06, Cristov Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Veto. IMO this is over engineered (pun intended). There is no clear
guidance on the difference between sound vs. audio and we are
putting mix here when we also have
what's happening with this one? i reckon it's good to go, but there's
a discussion on the wiki people might want to read -
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType
On 28/03/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:30:21 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
So we can
Hi,
any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ?
I will wait some days and then edit it. :)
Simon (Shepard)
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ?
I will wait some days and then edit it. :)
I think that would cause confusion. Frequently the phrase Recorded By is
understood to refer to the artist that performed it.
Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
any objections against http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/54 ?
I will wait some days and then edit it. :)
I think that would cause confusion. Frequently the phrase Recorded By
is understood to refer to the artist that
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:41:20 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:59:21 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote:
Using just Recorded By is ambiguous.
It would not just be recorded by but there is a description of the AR
type that can be very specific
Don Redman wrote:
meta-coment from-perspective=sociological
Somon: I'd suggest you wait until this discussion has either resolved in
a consensus or faded out. Then you make your own decision and request a
veto.
If you get one, let Robert decide.
/meta-comment
Somon? Solomon? Am I so wise?
On 25/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Don Redman wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:59:21 +0100, Steve Wyles wrote:
Using just Recorded By is ambiguous.
It would not just be recorded by but there is a description of the AR type
that can be very specific
On 26/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simplifying is good, but not when it could be misinterpreted. To a native
English speaker Recorded By has various meanings in the context of
musical works. The situation is far worse for non-native speakers, where
they might need to refer
On 26/03/06, Steve Wyles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simplifying is good, but not when it could be
misinterpreted. To a
native English speaker Recorded By has various meanings in the
context of musical works. The situation is far worse for
non-native
speakers, where they might
12 matches
Mail list logo
