On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:14:49 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Don Redman wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:27:49 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
No impact.
Um, no this is not true. Every change has an impact, otherwise it is
not a change. Maybe I should rephrase the question: What is the
difference
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our
mailing lists and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to
make vocal type optional, so that we can use ARs to say
Artist performed vocal on Track/Album.
I've already changed it on the test server. Here is an example:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:35:44 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our mailing lists
and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to make vocal type optional,
so that we can use ARs to say Artist performed vocal on Track/Album.
I've already changed
Don Redman wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:35:44 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
This has been discussed many times in almost all of our mailing lists
and AFAIK with no results. I think we need to make vocal type
optional, so that we can use ARs to say Artist performed vocal on
Track/Album.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:musicbrainz-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Bransden
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:48 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] vocal type should be optional
On 16/01/06, Cristov Russell
Cristov Russell wrote:
Remove Lead since it's what people seem to have the most trouble
with and it's rarely used in credits. Background would stay
since many
performers are actually credited as such. Also add beat boxed,
rapped/rhymed, hummed, spoke and change the vocal verbiage
