On 2013/12/02 11:12, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I've added poll based PollGroup implementation:
http://git.musicpd.org/cgit/dk/mpd.git/commit/?id=1df426aa5c571d3d88ecb7bed6b8ed9b32c15e32
After quick testing connecting with client and playing http streams
work, however I
On 2013/12/02 11:12, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I've added poll based PollGroup implementation:
http://git.musicpd.org/cgit/dk/mpd.git/commit/?id=1df426aa5c571d3d88ecb7bed6b8ed9b32c15e32
After quick testing connecting with client and playing http streams
work, however I
I've added Windows select backend for event loop as well as few fixes.
PollGroupEPoll.hxx: add const modifiers where applicable
Clock.cxx: provide all arguments for GetProcessTimes
event: implement PollGroup based on Windows select
configure.ac: code style improvements
New backend is enabled by
On 2013/11/29 10:40, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I've added Windows select backend for event loop as well as few
fixes.
Merged.
I like how well the incremental way of doing this works. When you've
added the portable poll() implementation, we'll test it, and then we
will
29.11.2013 16:00, Max Kellermann пишет:
Merged.
I like how well the incremental way of doing this works. When you've
added the portable poll() implementation, we'll test it, and then we
will eventually remove the GLib code.
Hi Max,
I appreciate your help in developing this.
I'm wondering
On 2013/11/29 19:18, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I'm wondering is there any plan for GLib removal in particular and
tasks for new version in general?
No, there is no grand plan. Things just happen whenever somebody
chooses to spend time on the code ;-)
There are quite a few
30.11.2013 0:27, Max Kellermann пишет:
No, there is no grand plan. Things just happen whenever somebody
chooses to spend time on the code ;-)
I didn't mean plan as a schedule for any specific version. I meant plan
as a list of tasks that anybody could pick and implement if they want to
On 2013/11/28 16:30, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I've added one more patch.
This introduces generic poll API as well as implementation for
epoll.
Merged.
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they
I've made a helper patch for simplifying futher work.
It adds various configuration options to simplify dealting with
different event loop implementations.
Here it is:
http://git.musicpd.org/cgit/dk/mpd.git/commit/?id=46bab7e4b921b79924643bacd08dcd3d1404ceb6
Also during testing I've found
27.11.2013 19:00, Max Kellermann пишет:
That's not perfect but ok, because ALSA is Linux specific, and on
Linux we always have epoll (there's no reason not to use it).
OK. Do you have any comments on the patch itself?
--
Denis
On 2013/11/27 14:18, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
OK. Do you have any comments on the patch itself?
Just read it merged. Looks excellent!
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business.
On 2013/11/19 13:12, Denis Krjuchkov de...@crazydev.net wrote:
I'm trying to implement new event loop for MPD without GLib (or any
other library).
It's borrowed from existing epoll-based event loop.
I only abstracted API differences behind general inteface (PollGroup class).
Currently there
24.11.2013 21:06, Max Kellermann пишет:
My few cents:
Thanks for the comments!
- you reordered code in event/Loop.cxx, which makes reading the diff
more difficult than necessary
That's my fault, probably I was addicted to Add/Modify/Remove trio in
every class :-)
- the
13 matches
Mail list logo
