to/cc/bcc address entry bug

I realize this is a user input failure, but the result is somewhat obtuse. Let's say that you want to add a CC recipient to a list. You hit "C", and it opens the list: Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-cursor here If you type ", [EMAIL PROTECTED]" it works fine. But if you simple

Re: to/cc/bcc address entry bug

On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:00:53PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote: Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-cursor here If you type ", [EMAIL PROTECTED]" it works fine. But if you simple type another e-mail address, like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", the Cc: list is truncated to simply: Cc: [EMAIL

undo (abandon) changes *without* exit?

Hi, folks -- I know, thanks to a post to the list a while ago, about '$' to write all changes to the mailbox without requiring an exit. I also know that I can abandon all changes by exiting instead of quitting. Is there any way I can abandon, or undo, all changes a la 'x' but NOT have to exit

Re: mutt pgp

Andy -- Welcome to the Great Mutt PGP Debate, wherein the religious philosophy of adhering to the proper RFC standards versus doing it the way it's always been. In short, PGP signatures and encrypted text really should, according to RFC 2015 (IIRC), be attachments. In even shorter, mutt folks

deleting collapsed threads

Hi I hope I did not misobserve this. When I have collased threads (like in esc-V) and I press 'd' it chooses one mail with an arbetrary algorithem and delets it (ok, the alg. is 'take the 1st mail' ;) Wouldn't it be more logical that 'd' will delete the whole thread? just binding 'd' to

Re: mutt pgp

Thanks, I didn't know about the RFC 2015 (IIRC). But at least I do know now that I am doing right, what (allmost) everybody else is doing wrong :))) Andy On Tue, Jan 19, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: Andy -- Welcome to the Great Mutt PGP Debate, wherein the religious philosophy of

Re: PGP v2 to PGP v5 upgrade

On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 06:08:47PM +, SteelOnIce wrote: Hi again... I now also upgraded my pgp version and it doesn't really seem to work with mutt anymore... I set "set pgp_default_version=pgp5" in my muttrc but I still can't read signatures... all it says is: [-- PGP output

Re: mutt pgp

What I'm getting at is that while Mutt may be doing it right, you can get down off your high horse and help out the people who have to be able to work in a backwards compatible fashion. The current PGP-Notes documentation scratches the surface at best. I figured it out - as I'm sure many

ispell notification (feature suggestion)

Have mutt return a success message if ispell returns a 0. Or something like that. Currently if ispell runs over a message and finds no errors, there is no way of knowing that ispell ran at all. -- Scott

Re: mutt pgp

SteelOnIce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... all I want to do is send a plain text message, which contains the pgp message NO ATACHMENTS... In your .muttrc: # For generating old-style clearsigned PGP unMIMEd attachments: macro compose f1 "Fpgp +verbose=0 -fast