On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
> [-- End of PGP output --]
>
> [-- The f
On 2000-09-21 00:57:06 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> [-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> However, when replying, I could get the full text.
That's because, when replying, mutt doesn't even try to verify a
signature. Unsetting pgp_verify_sig (
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
> >
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > > verified."? gpg itsel
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
> it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
> EXACT SAME MESSAGE aft
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 13:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> > noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
> > it says) to "PGP signat
Hi,
I'm using a dial-up connection to check my mail. Don't think it matters for you'll but
maybe it does so thought "why not mention it". I Have now one pop3 host added in my
.muttrc file. It looks like this:
set pop_delete=yes
set pop_host=
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 14:46 +0100, housebee wrote:
> ...
> I have read the FAQ but could not find any help matching my problem. I
> hope someone can help me to make it able for me to check more than one
> pop3 hosts.
Mutt can't do this. Try Fetchmail - you can specify several POP3 hosts
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:46:17PM +0100, housebee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a dial-up connection to check my mail. Don't think it matters for you'll
>but maybe it does so thought "why not mention it". I Have now one pop3 host added in
>my .muttrc file. It looks like this:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:46:17PM +0100, housebee wrote:
> I hope someone can help me to make it able for me to check more than
> one pop3 hosts.
I would suggest using fetchmail from a cron script. Fetchmail can
download messages from multiple accounts of different types. And you
would get y
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:46:17PM +0100, housebee wrote:
> I have read the FAQ but could not find any help matching my problem. I
> hope someone can help me to make it able for me to check more than one
> pop3 hosts.
>From section 4.10 of the mutt manual:
,
| Note: The POP3 support is th
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > [PS. Mail-Folllowup-To header ignored. You probably have a "lists"
> > command which should be changed a "subscribe" command"].
>
> Ah - well spotted, Sir. Is that better now?
I still don't understand the difference between "lists
Housebee --
...and then housebee said...
%
% set pop_host=""
...
%
% I have read the FAQ but could not find any help matching my problem. I hope someone
can help me to make it able for me to check more than one pop3 hosts.
The best answer, as you have seen already, is to use fetchmail instead
Hi to all...
I'm a mutt newbe and I do not have read all of the Docu yet...
I installed pgp 2.6.3.i on debian 2.2 with dpkg -i an I allready have a
generated key.
But, always, when I'm reading messages from mua's with pgp-support, I see
this:
--
ERROR: Header line added to ASCII armor: "H
Using a large mallet, Ben Beuchler whacked out:
> I still don't understand the difference between "lists" and "subscribe".
Look at the readme.upgrade file. subscribe supersedes the old lists command.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lumber Cartel of India + You spamma my mailbox
On 2000-09-21 12:05:21 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I still don't understand the difference between "lists" and
> "subscribe". When should each be used? I've always just added
> all my lists to both commands...
The set of known lists (lists) is _always_ a subset of the set of
subscribed lists (
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:05:21PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I still don't understand the difference between "lists" and "subscribe".
> When should each be used? I've always just added all my lists to both
> commands...
"lists" is for lists you want mutt to know about, but which you are not
n
On 21-Sep-2000, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I still don't understand the difference between "lists" and "subscribe".
> When should each be used? I've always just added all my lists to both
> commands...
"subscribe" implies "lists", if you already specify it with subscribe,
there's no need to specify i
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 14:46:17 +0100, housebee wrote:
> I have read the FAQ but could not find any help matching my problem.
> I hope someone can help me to make it able for me to check more than
> one pop3 hosts.
You could make a macro with something like this (untested):
macro index G \
"se
What is recommended way of visually signalling the arrival of new mail?
With Solaris mailtool I got used to a little `mailbox with letters' icon.
Mutt is so *totally cool*, though, that I don't want to go back to the
Sun mail application.
Yeah, I could just leave a mutt window open and check it p
How do I move a message from one folder to another?
I know message are moved to my read-mail folder from the inbox
after I have read them, but what about specifying a target
folder other than the default?
I know I can do it by copying the message to the target folder and
then delete the message
hi cory-- all you need to do is hit 's', which is just like 'C' except it
deletes the message after copying it.
take care
peter
On 21 Sep 00, 3:42PM, Cory Phillips wrote:
> How do I move a message from one folder to another?
>
> I know message are moved to my read-mail folder from the inbox
>
* the/eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000921 16:04]:
> What is recommended way of visually signalling the arrival of new mail?
> With Solaris mailtool I got used to a little `mailbox with letters' icon.
> Mutt is so *totally cool*, though, that I don't want to go back to the
> Sun mail application.
On 2000-09-21 15:42:51 -0500, Cory Phillips wrote:
> I know I can do it by copying the message to the target folder
> and then delete the message in the source folder, but this is an
> anoying process. Is there a simple key sequence for moving
> message around?
The process of copying and subseq
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 02:23:58PM -0500, the/eXtreme wrote:
> What is recommended way of visually signalling the arrival of new mail?
[...]
I have used "coolmail" in the past, and I#m using "xbuffy" at the moment.
The latter is very handy when you are using procmail to pre-sort incoming
mail int
Submitted 21-Sep-00 by Jan- Hendrik Palic:
> I'm a mutt newbe and I do not have read all of the Docu yet...
Hidee :)
> ERROR: Header line added to ASCII armor: "Hash: SHA1"
> ASCII armor corrupted.
Correct. Newer versions of PGP and GPG add a line to identify the hash
used. 2.6.x always used
In reading the docs I discovered 'P' for taking me to the parent
message in a thread. Handy, but then I have to find my way back to the
message I was reading. Is there a shortcut to take me back to the
previously-viewed message?
--
- Bruce
Am I correct in understanding that subscribe/lists matches are from
the beginning of the pattern only? (I.e., there is no way to specify a
series of lists on egroups.com all at once?)
--
- Bruce
Hello,
I seem to have found a bug in mutt, when using 'mutt recipient_address' from
the commandline. Minimal test case follows:
[charon]$ mutt foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No recipients specified.
[charon]$ mutt -v
Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt come
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:41:26PM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> "subscribe" implies "lists", if you already specify it with subscribe,
> there's no need to specify it again in lists. lists indicates known
> list names which you don't necessarily subscribe to. This is used, for
> example, by the
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 21 Sep 2000:
> The set of known lists (lists) is _always_ a subset of the set of
> subscribed lists (subscribe).
Umm, the other way around I believe. Or s/subset/superset/.
> Known lists are handled properly by list-reply, subscribed lists
> lea
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:05:21 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> > > [PS. Mail-Folllowup-To header ignored. You probably have a "lists"
> > > command which should be changed a "subscribe" command"].
> >
> > Ah - well spotted, Sir. Is
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> I seem to have found a bug in mutt, when using 'mutt recipient_address' from
> the commandline. Minimal test case follows:
>
> [charon]$ mutt foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's not a valid address.
> It works fine with zero or one '@' signs in an addre
Była godzina 23:09:13 w środa 20 wrzesień, gdy do autobusu wsiadł kanar
i wrzasnął:"Eugene Paskevich!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
> P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
> Answer directly please.
I am sorry but i only know how to answer
Using a large mallet, Lukasz Stelmach whacked out:
> By³a godzina 23:09:13 w ¶roda 20 wrzesieñ, gdy do autobusu wsiad³ kanar
> i wrzasn±³:"Eugene Paskevich!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
> > P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
> > Answ
35 matches
Mail list logo
