Re: Mise en place de balise dans le sujet

2002-09-12 Thread Bernard Massot
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:42:55AM +, Kiouk wrote: Bonjour, Je vous écris afin de savoir si il était possible de mettre automatiquement une balise type [mutt-user-fr] dans le sujet des mails de la liste afin de pouvoir les distinguer du reste du courrier que l'on reçois. la meilleure

collapse + pager_index_lines

2002-09-12 Thread Sbastien MICHEL
Blop, Voici ma question: j'utilise set pager_index_lines=10 je vois donc un peu mes thread etc. je voudrais pouvoir les collapses (avec esc+v) sans quitter le preview de msg. quelqu'un vois ? :) -- +, MichouX Et Dieu se retourna et contempla son Oeuvre Et Il dit : Et mrde !

Re: collapse + pager_index_lines

2002-09-12 Thread Cedric Duval
Salut, Sébastien MICHEL a écrit : Voici ma question: j'utilise set pager_index_lines=10 je vois donc un peu mes thread etc. je voudrais pouvoir les collapses (avec esc+v) sans quitter le preview de msg. quelqu'un vois ? :) Une solution avec macros : macro pager \ev

Re: Mise en place de balise dans le sujet

2002-09-12 Thread Olivier Tharan
* Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20020912 16:22): Je ne pense pas que Sender doit-être utilisé pour ça, car il es modifié dans certains cas (par exemple, des email que je forward automatiquement d'une adresse email à une autre change le Sended:) b bounce-message

Re: Mise en place de balise dans le sujet

2002-09-12 Thread Cedric Duval
Olivier Tharan a écrit : * Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20020912 16:22): Je ne pense pas que Sender doit-être utilisé pour ça, car il es modifié dans certains cas (par exemple, des email que je forward automatiquement d'une adresse email à une autre change le Sended:) b

Re: Sourcing scripts, screen flashes.

2002-09-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-11 17:23 +0200]: * Ryan Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-10 06:32]: source ~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/| source ~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/| * Sven Guckes wrote: source filename source filename| filename

Re: make install error

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Tatge
Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I get the following error during 'make install' and I don't understand. make[1]: *** No rule to make target mime.h', needed by ttach.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /mnt/scratch/KeeP/mutt-1.5.1' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 You need to

Re: Trying to do too much with Mutt?

2002-09-12 Thread Erik Christiansen
Ouch! Leaving revelation of the nub of the problem till the attempted solution, was clearly not helpful. Clearer is: In order to provide a history of correspondence, filed by project, on originating laptops and on a server, the two-part goal is to: a) Archive outgoing mail to one

Batch mode and content-type

2002-09-12 Thread vdaelli
Hello I am a newbie to mutt and would like to use it in a bash script in order to send mails to a list. The script is like: - #!/bin/sh for i in `cat listaMail` do mutt -s All'attenzione del signore $i $i /home/info/mails/mail.html done - The only

Re: sending as who you've been addressed as.

2002-09-12 Thread Lukas Ruf
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Michael Elkins wrote: see $reverse_name in the mutt manual. So, is there then an easy way to differentiate if an email get's composed completely from scratch or if an email is simply a reply? Assume the following: - I have several email addresses that I receive emails

imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Gregory Seidman
At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and unread. This means that mutt -Z is useless. Is there some adjustment that would have to be made on the server to make new messages appear as new (I

adding references when resending mail

2002-09-12 Thread Anders Helmersson
Sometimes I need to follow-up on some previously sent mail. For instance, I have forgotten to mention something or I have got some new information to add. I want my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. What is the appropriate and easiest way of adding such references. Here, I am not

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:04:06 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and unread. This means that mutt -Z is useless. Is there some adjustment that would

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread darren chamberlain
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 10:12]: Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I reconnect to the server, all the new messages become old messages! This is very annoying, in particular when I have to quit and restart Mutt without having read all the new

Re: adding references when resending mail

2002-09-12 Thread Johan Almqvist
* Anders Helmersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 16:10]: Sometimes I need to follow-up on some previously sent mail. For instance, I have forgotten to mention something or I have got some new information to add. I want my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. What is the appropriate

Re: adding references when resending mail - reply

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Anders Helmersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 14:08]: Sometimes I need to follow-up on some previously sent mail. For instance, I have forgotten to mention something or I have got some new information to add. I want my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. What is the

Re: [PATCH] display-subject

2002-09-12 Thread Ken Weingold
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: The attached patch copies the functionality of the display-address function to display the message subject, by default bound to S. This is useful if your term isn't infinitely wide and/or you have a crowded $index_format. I've been using a

Re: Trying to do too much with Mutt? - yes, too much!

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Erik Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 10:22]: In order to provide a history of correspondence, filed by project, on originating laptops and on a server, the two-part goal is to: a) Archive outgoing mail to one of many local mail folders, as selected by an email header. The

Re: pattern question

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Elkins
Ren? Clerc wrote: is it possible to use patterns to specify a message that is directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to someone else and not cc'ed to someone else either? Sorry, but I'm no pattern or regexp guru... It depends upon what you're talking about. You can't do this with a regexp

Re: Batch mode and content-type

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Elkins
vdaelli wrote: The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content-type: text/plain, while we would like to send a content-type: text/html. So the receiver sees the source HTML. Is there a way to override this default setting and let us send a personalized content-type? This

Re: sending as who you've been addressed as.

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Elkins
Lukas Ruf wrote: So, is there then an easy way to differentiate if an email get's composed completely from scratch or if an email is simply a reply? Assume the following: - I have several email addresses that I receive emails for. - According to the addresses in the To: field, I set the

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:15:04 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: * Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 10:12]: Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I reconnect to the server, all the new messages become old messages! This is very annoying, in particular when

Re: Batch mode and content-type

2002-09-12 Thread David Rock
* vdaelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 12:40]: - #!/bin/sh for i in `cat listaMail` do mutt -s All'attenzione del signore $i $i /home/info/mails/mail.html done - The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content-type:

Re: pattern question

2002-09-12 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 12:03 +0200 12 Sep 2002, René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it possible to use patterns to specify a message that is directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to someone else and not cc'ed to someone else either? ^~C ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]$ The ^ modifier specifies that all addresses must

.mailcap start prog in background

2002-09-12 Thread Sascha Huedepohl
Hi, is it possible to define a .mailcap entry that way, that the viewer runs in the background and mutt is free to work with? I mean something like: image/*; feh -x %s ; TIA sascha -- Sascha Huedepohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: .mailcap start prog in background

2002-09-12 Thread Christoph Maurer
On 2002-09-12 Sascha Huedepohl wrote: Hi, is it possible to define a .mailcap entry that way, that the viewer runs in the background and mutt is free to work with? I mean something like: image/*; feh -x %s ; I use a script named mutt_bgrun for this. Found it somewhere on the net. You

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Leone
Vincent Lefevre said: On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:15:04 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: * Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 10:12]: Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I reconnect to the server, all the new messages become old messages! This is very

Re: adding references when resending mail - reply

2002-09-12 Thread Anders Helmersson
well - reply to your own mail and add the missing info. you could use the resend-mail command, of course, but that might start a new thread. What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own mail id, even if it is not a reply but a resending of my own mail. Here, I

removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread David Rock
I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg30933/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread Will Yardley
David Rock wrote: I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? unset metoo should do what you want. if that doesn't work, perhaps you don't have $alternates set correctly.

Re: removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread Johan Almqvist
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates correctly... -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

Re: removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread David Rock
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]: * David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates correctly... Duh, worked

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 14:12:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: Vincent Lefevre said: No, the old messages will be marked as new, and I don't want that. You don't want them marked as old and unread; you don't want them to stay marked as new (which implies unread), if you exit and restart

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Leone
Vincent Lefevre said: On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 14:12:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: Vincent Lefevre said: No, the old messages will be marked as new, and I don't want that. You don't want them marked as old and unread; you don't want them to stay marked as new (which implies unread), if

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: Vincent Lefevre said: I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading): 1) Messages that mustn't be deleted. 2) Messages I've read but I want to keep for some time. 3) Messages I've read or partly

Re: adding references when resending mail - reply

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Anders Helmersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 18:44]: well - reply to your own mail and add the missing info. you could use the resend-mail command, of course, but that might start a new thread. What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own mail id, even

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 22:31 +0200]: On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: Vincent Lefevre said: I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading): 1) Messages that mustn't be deleted. 2) Messages I've read

Re: imap and new mail

2002-09-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 23:47:23 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: I use the attached patch (with mark_old is unset). But I must admit, I use it only with local Maildirs. What does it do? -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc

Re: removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread Rob Park
Alas! David Rock spake thus: 6.3.96. metoo Type: boolean Default: no If unset, Mutt will remove your address from the list of recipients Mutt can only know who you are by $alternates. Neither of these really explains that metoo needs alternates

Re: removing self from group reply

2002-09-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 19:32]: * Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]: * David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if

Mutt support for mixmaster 2.9bxx

2002-09-12 Thread rex
Why doesn't mutt support mixmaster 2.9bxx? The mutt manual says: Mixmaster support in mutt is for mixmaster version 2.04 (beta 45 appears to be the latest) and 2.03. It does not support earlier versions or the later so-called version 3 betas, of which the latest appears to be called

imap/pop w/cyrus virtual domains

2002-09-12 Thread Mark Nipper
After beating my head against the wall for several days, I finally convinced my Exim 4.x MTA to deliver to a [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mydomain.net style address via LMTP to a Cyrus mailstore. I was ecstatic to say the least. And then I go to check everything is working (without having

Re: adding references when resending mail - reply

2002-09-12 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Anders Helmersson wrote: well - reply to your own mail and add the missing info. you could use the resend-mail command, of course, but that might start a new thread. What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own mail id, even if it is