Re: adding references when resending mail -> "reply"

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Anders Helmersson wrote: > > well - "reply" to your own mail and add the missing info. > > you could use the resend-mail command, of course, > > but that might start a new thread. > > What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own > mail id, even i

imap/pop w/cyrus virtual domains

After beating my head against the wall for several days, I finally convinced my Exim 4.x MTA to deliver to a [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mydomain.net style address via LMTP to a Cyrus mailstore. I was ecstatic to say the least. And then I go to check everything is working (without having t

Mutt support for mixmaster 2.9bxx

Why doesn't mutt support mixmaster 2.9bxx? The mutt manual says: Mixmaster support in mutt is for mixmaster version 2.04 (beta 45 appears to be the latest) and 2.03. It does not support earlier versions or the later so-called version 3 betas, of which the latest appears to be called 2.9b

Re: removing self from group reply

* David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 19:32]: > * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 21:10]: > > * David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020912 21:02]: > > > When I group reply to a message, is there any way to > > > remove my own address from the recipient list? > > > > Mutt should d

Re: removing self from group reply

Alas! David Rock spake thus: > 6.3.96. metoo > > Type: boolean > Default: no > > If unset, Mutt will remove your address from the list of recipients Mutt can only know who "you" are by $alternates. > Neither of these really explains that metoo needs al

Re: imap and new mail

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 23:47:23 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > I use the attached patch (with "mark_old is unset"). But I must admit, > I use it only with local Maildirs. What does it do? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn

Re: imap and new mail

* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 22:31 +0200]: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > > > Vincent Lefevre said: > > > I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading): > > > 1) Messages that mustn't be deleted. > > > 2) Messag

Re: adding references when resending mail -> "reply"

* Anders Helmersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 18:44]: > > well - "reply" to your own mail and add the missing info. > > you could use the resend-mail command, of course, > > but that might start a new thread. > > What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to > will include my own mai

Re: imap and new mail

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 16:15:36 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre said: > > I want 4 levels (in the same mailbox, to get the benefit of threading): > > 1) Messages that mustn't be deleted. > > 2) Messages I've read but I want to keep for some time. > > 3) Messages I've read o

Re: imap and new mail

Vincent Lefevre said: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 14:12:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: >> >> Vincent Lefevre said: >> > No, the old messages will be marked as new, and I don't want that. >> >> You don't want them marked as old and unread; you don't want them to >> stay marked as new (which implies

Re: imap and new mail

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 14:12:14 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: > > Vincent Lefevre said: > > No, the old messages will be marked as new, and I don't want that. > > You don't want them marked as old and unread; you don't want them to stay > marked as new (which implies unread), if you exit and rest

Re: removing self from group reply

* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 21:10]: > * David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020912 21:02]: > > When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own > > address from the recipient list? > > Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates > correctly... Duh, w

Re: removing self from group reply

Alas! David Rock spake thus: > I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: > > When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own > address from the recipient list? Grep the manual for "metoo" or similar. -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/ --

Re: removing self from group reply

* David Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020912 21:02]: > When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own > address from the recipient list? Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates correctly... -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/

Re: removing self from group reply

David Rock wrote: > I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: > > When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own > address from the recipient list? unset metoo should do what you want. if that doesn't work, perhaps you don't have $alternates set correctl

removing self from group reply

I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere: When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own address from the recipient list? -- David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg30933/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: adding references when resending mail -> "reply"

> well - "reply" to your own mail and add the missing info. > you could use the resend-mail command, of course, > but that might start a new thread. What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own mail id, even if it is not a reply but a resending of my own mail. > > He

Re: imap and new mail

Vincent Lefevre said: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:15:04 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: >> * Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 10:12]: >> > Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I >> reconnect to the server, all the new messages become old messages! >> This is

Re: .mailcap start prog in background

On 2002-09-12 Sascha Huedepohl wrote: > Hi, > is it possible to define a .mailcap entry that way, that the > "viewer" runs in the background and mutt is "free" to work with? > > I mean something like: > image/*; feh -x %s &; > I use a script named mutt_bgrun for this. Found it somewhere on the

.mailcap start prog in background

Hi, is it possible to define a .mailcap entry that way, that the "viewer" runs in the background and mutt is "free" to work with? I mean something like: image/*; feh -x %s &; TIA sascha -- Sascha Huedepohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pattern question

At 12:03 +0200 12 Sep 2002, René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it possible to use patterns to specify a message that is directed > to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to someone else and not cc'ed to someone else > either? ^~C ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]$ The ^ modifier specifies that all addresses mu

Re: sending as who you've been addressed as.

At 13:41 +0200 12 Sep 2002, Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, is there then an easy way to differentiate if an email get's > composed completely from scratch or if an email is simply a reply? A reply will have references, a message composed from scratch won't. So the pattern '~x.' will

Re: Batch mode and content-type

* vdaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 12:40]: > - > #!/bin/sh > > for i in `cat listaMail` > do > mutt -s "All'attenzione del signore $i" $i < > /home/info/mails/mail.html > done > - > > The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content

Re: imap and new mail

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:15:04 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > * Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 10:12]: > > Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I reconnect > > to the server, all the new messages become old messages! This is very > > annoying, in particu

Re: sending as who you've been addressed as.

Lukas Ruf wrote: > So, is there then an easy way to differentiate if an email get's > composed completely from scratch or if an email is simply a reply? > > Assume the following: > - I have several email addresses that I receive emails for. > - According to the addresses in the To: field, I set t

Re: Batch mode and content-type

vdaelli wrote: > The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content-type: > text/plain, while we would like to send a content-type: text/html. > So the receiver sees the source HTML. > Is there a way to override this default setting and let us send a > personalized content-type? Th

Re: pattern question

Ren? Clerc wrote: > is it possible to use patterns to specify a message that is directed > to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to someone else and not cc'ed to someone else > either? > > Sorry, but I'm no pattern or regexp guru... It depends upon what you're talking about. You can't do this with a re

Re: Trying to do too much with Mutt? - yes, too much!

* Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 10:22]: > In order to provide a history of correspondence, filed by project, > on originating laptops and on a server, the two-part goal is to: > > a) Archive outgoing mail to one of many local mail folders, > as selected by an email header. Th

Re: [PATCH] display-subject

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > The attached patch copies the functionality of the display-address function > to display the message subject, by default bound to S. This is useful if > your term isn't infinitely wide and/or you have a crowded $index_format. > > I've been using a ve

Re: adding references when resending mail -> "reply"

* Anders Helmersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 14:08]: > Sometimes I need to "follow-up" on some previously sent mail. > For instance, I have forgotten to mention something > or I have got some new information to add. I want > my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. > > What is t

Re: adding references when resending mail

* Anders Helmersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020912 16:10]: > Sometimes I need to "follow-up" on some previously sent mail. For instance, > I have forgotten to mention something or I have got some new information to > add. I want my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. > What is the appro

Re: imap and new mail

* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 10:12]: > Here, with IMAP, I get new messages as expected. But when I reconnect > to the server, all the new messages become old messages! This is very > annoying, in particular when I have to quit and restart Mutt without > having read all the new

Re: imap and new mail

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:04:06 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange > server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and > unread. This means that mutt -Z is useless. Is there some adjustment that > wou

adding references when resending mail

Sometimes I need to "follow-up" on some previously sent mail. For instance, I have forgotten to mention something or I have got some new information to add. I want my new mail to get threaded under the original mail. What is the appropriate and easiest way of adding such references. Here, I am no

imap and new mail

At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and unread. This means that mutt -Z is useless. Is there some adjustment that would have to be made on the server to make new messages appear as new (I

Re: sending as who you've been addressed as.

On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Michael Elkins wrote: > > see $reverse_name in the mutt manual. So, is there then an easy way to differentiate if an email get's composed completely from scratch or if an email is simply a reply? Assume the following: - I have several email addresses that I receive emails

Re: [PATCH] display-subject

On Wed 11-Sep-2002 at 11:46:29PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > The attached patch copies the functionality of the display-address > function to display the message subject, by default bound to S. This > is useful if your term isn't infinitely wide and/or you have a crowded > $index_format. T

Batch mode and content-type

Hello I am a newbie to mutt and would like to use it in a bash script in order to send mails to a list. The script is like: - #!/bin/sh for i in `cat listaMail` do mutt -s "All'attenzione del signore $i" $i < /home/info/mails/mail.html done - The only pr

Re: Trying to do too much with Mutt?

Ouch! Leaving revelation of the nub of the problem till the attempted solution, was clearly not helpful. Clearer is: In order to provide a history of correspondence, filed by project, on originating laptops and on a server, the two-part goal is to: a) Archive outgoing mail to one o

pattern question

Hi all, is it possible to use patterns to specify a message that is directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to someone else and not cc'ed to someone else either? Sorry, but I'm no pattern or regexp guru... -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Experience is a hard teacher be

Re: make install error

Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I get the following error during 'make install' and I don't understand. > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target mime.h', needed by
ttach.o'. Stop. > make[1]: Leaving directory /mnt/scratch/KeeP/mutt-1.5.1' > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 You nee

Re: Sourcing scripts, screen flashes.

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 17:23 +0200]: > * Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]: > > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"| > > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/"| > > * Sven Guckes wrote: > > source filename > > source fil