On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 06:32:51PM -0400, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Crist=F3bal_Palmer_
wrote:
>
> My very-lazy-sysadmin solution, in honor of Sysadmin Appreciation Day[0].
>
> 1) fire up gnu screen(1)
> 2) mutt -F /path/to/some/muttrc
> 3) ^ac to open a new screen window
> 4) mutt -F /other/account/muttrc
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Dale Harris wrote:
>
> Frankly (being an armchair coder here), mutt I think needs to be
> re-engineered how it handles multiple accounts, it becoming a real PITA.
> There should be separate menu for this and a clean way to have it
> configured. This is t
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 07:44:18AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> You can't just make the macros longer? Eg (untested):
>
> macro index ":source ~/.mutt/profile.default\nc" # "Load
> default profile"
>
> (Note the "c" inserted at the end of the macro.)
> --
> Cameron Simpson <[EMA
On 17Jul2008 20:38, Jorge Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:32:46PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
| > # macros to invoke a profile
| > macro index ":source ~/.mutt/profile.default\n" # "Load
default profile"
| > macro pager ":source ~/.mutt/profile.default\n"
On Jul 25 11:46, David Champion wrote:
> > A more elegant solution could be a config var $configdir or $scriptdir for
> > people who
> >
> > - have more then one script laying around in ~/.mutt (or wherever)
> > - don't want to put Mutt-specific scripts in a location on $PATH
>
> You al
* Marianne Promberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-25 12:17 +0200]:
> However, it turns out that even with such as ...
>
> folder-hook . 'push "~s
> test234s\Ca\Ck=isomerica/archive\n"'
>
> if no message matches "~s test234" it does always save the last
> message to the archive, so this would h
> > You can work around this by putting MUTTDIR in your shell environment
> > before running mutt.
>
> Hmm, how do you read my mind? :)
:)
Well, I actually do this for a few variables -- predating the $my_xyz
feature. I should switch where I can though, so I can drop the setenv
patch. (Lets me
On Jul 25 10:36, David Champion wrote:
> >>set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt
> >>folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ...
> >
> >> Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command
> >> over
> >> to the shell. Is there a trick to do that?
> >
> > It doesn't seem so. At least
On Jul 25 17:32, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Steve S wrote:
>
>> I have tried
>
>>set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt
>>folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ...
>
>> Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command over
>> to the shell. Is there a trick to do that?
>
> It d
* Ravi Uday [22.Tem.08 11:31 -0700]:
> If there is a way to retrieve your ~/.muttrc from a existing mutt
> session, please let me know. That would help too as my
> .muttrc is deleted :(
Attach gdb to your mutt process with:
gdb /proc/$PPID/exe $PPID
And inside gdb dump the variables like so:
> Question for people who post here more frequently than I do - is it
> normal to get a challenge/response mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when
> posting here ?
It's typical (I get one every time I post), but it's not normal (in the
sense that it shouldn't happen). Challenge/response should never be
>>set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt
>>folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ...
>
>> Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command over
>> to the shell. Is there a trick to do that?
>
> It doesn't seem so. At least for interactive shell-escape function it's
> documented
Hi,
* Michelle Konzack wrote:
I wish, there was a function which dump the actuell running config...
Please add this wish to http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3064. Maybe
it'll be easy to implement another command such as "save" that will
print the contents to a file rather then a paged menu.
Hi,
* Steve S wrote:
I have tried
set my_muttdir=$HOME/.mutt
folder-hook `$my_muttdir/script.sh` ...
Here, Mutt doesn't seem to expand $my_muttdir before handing the command over
to the shell. Is there a trick to do that?
It doesn't seem so. At least for interactive shell-escape f
On Jul 25 08:15, David Champion wrote:
> > folder-hook folder1|folder2|folder3 ...
> >
> > I replaced this with
> >
> > folder-hook script.sh| ...
>
> This approach won't work. Here's why, and a possible alternative.
>
> The "script.sh|" notation for incorporating a script's output int
Am 2008-07-22 11:31:28, schrieb Ravi Uday:
> Just to add to this,
>
> If there is a way to retrieve your ~/.muttrc from a existing mutt
> session, please let me know. That would help too as my
> .muttrc is deleted :(
I wish, there was a function which dump the actuell running config...
Thanks, G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, July 24 at 02:16 PM, quoth Ravi Uday:
> In mutt 1.5.17 is there a way we can setup a rule where if the
> number of emails touches 150 move the first 50 to a specified folder
> ? We can then map this rule witha key too ?
Well, it's no so
> folder-hook folder1|folder2|folder3 ...
>
> I replaced this with
>
> folder-hook script.sh| ...
This approach won't work. Here's why, and a possible alternative.
The "script.sh|" notation for incorporating a script's output into your
muttrc only works where mutt knows that it's looki
On Jul 25 12:44, Michael Kjorling wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2008 14:06 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve S):
> > I replaced this with
> >
> > folder-hook script.sh| ...
> >
> > and script.sh :
> >
> > echo 'folder1|folder2|folder3'
>
> Maybe what you want is more along the lines of
>
> folde
On 25 Jul 2008 14:06 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve S):
> I replaced this with
>
> folder-hook script.sh| ...
>
> and script.sh :
>
> echo 'folder1|folder2|folder3'
Maybe what you want is more along the lines of
folder-hook `script.sh` ...
--
Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have a folder-hook acting on different folders:
folder-hook folder1|folder2|folder3 ...
I replaced this with
folder-hook script.sh| ...
and script.sh :
echo 'folder1|folder2|folder3'
Now, the pattern matches every folder, i.e. the hook acts on all folders, not
just folder1,2
On 24 Jul 2008 14:16 -0700, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ravi Uday):
> In mutt 1.5.17 is there a way we can setup a rule where if the number
> of emails touches 150 move the first 50 to a specified folder ?
> We can then map this rule witha key too ?
If you are using maildir (I guess MH could work too, b
On Friday, 25 July 2008, 11:46 (UTC+0200), Mads Laursen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:07, Marianne Promberger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Something like (not tested, and I'm sure others have better direct
> > function names where I use keyboard presses)
> >
> > folder-hook . 'pu
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:07, Marianne Promberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Something like (not tested, and I'm sure others have better direct
> function names where I use keyboard presses)
>
> folder-hook . 'push "~d > 1ms\Ca\Ck=archive\n$"'
>
> Actually, trying the line above just now
On Friday, 25 July 2008, 10:25 (UTC+0200), Steve S wrote:
> On Jul 24 14:16, Ravi Uday wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In mutt 1.5.17 is there a way we can setup a rule where if the number
> > of emails touches 150 move the first 50 to a specified folder ?
> > We can then map this rule witha key too ?
> >
On Jul 24 14:16, Ravi Uday wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In mutt 1.5.17 is there a way we can setup a rule where if the number
> of emails touches 150 move the first 50 to a specified folder ?
> We can then map this rule witha key too ?
>
If you are also satisfied with using the message age as criterion, you
26 matches
Mail list logo
