On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may want to
cut-and-paste the list address, or
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:05:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:13:38AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan on setting up an IMAP server for use with mutt. This will be
my first time working with an IMAP server. Any suggestions on which
server to use?
Depends on the system hosting the IMAP server, but I would suspect
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:50:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to to have to specify a nickname, such as:
alias Smith, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alias Jones, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alias Jackson, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
I'm willing to type in their full names,
Hi all. I need some help.
Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
the main MTA. Good for them, you might say. However, this
particular scanner communicates its result by adding an extra text/plain
attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI, this violates the PGP/MIME
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:25:28AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and then Dave Smith said...
%
% Hi all. I need some help.
Hello!
Hello... :-)
% particular scanner communicates its result by adding an extra text/plain
% attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI, this violates
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:46:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Smith [04/23/02 10:19:26 CEST] wrote:
Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
the main MTA. Good for them, you might say. However, this
particular scanner communicates its result
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[snip]
* OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
I think that's the WU IMAP implementation...
It looks identical to
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:21:21AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once I mark a message as deleted and exit mutt, where does it move the
message?
Assuming you answered yes to the 'delete ... messages?' question,
it goes to the Great Mailbox in the Sky.
I.e., is the message
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:09:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all. just a quick question from a newbie. i usually sign all my
emails but one of the lists i write to complains that it will not accept
emails with attachments due to the fact that they don't want to spread
msft viruses.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote:
Text based rules,
Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio
and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:17:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question popped in my mind; when GnuPG automagicly fetches
a key of some person and verifies it, it goes to the key list (I mean,
that I can check it out with 'gpg --list-keys'). Does this mean, that
it is signed? If
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:10:11AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In and English accent (particularly Canadian/American) it /may/ sound
feminine... but you should never assume that just because in your phonetics, a
name sounds feminine, that it is. Indeed, never assume at all that you can
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:35:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses, and
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a copy of terminal after entering message which was and encrypted, but
NOT SIGNED:
[unimportant bits snipped from message to shorten it]
Date:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:09:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +, Dave Smith wrote:
Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
if it wasn't signed
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:27:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have signed this message with a bogus key, so you can see what happens.
My real key is available on www.keyserver.net.
Hmm, it doesn't appear to shout, since the key IDs don't match. I guess if
I were to create a key with an
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:03:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just subscribed using a new email address but can't get the old
address unsubscribed, which is still forwarded to me, so I get two copies
of each msg.
I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt to the old
Our IT group have just fixed the mail setup so that I can send mail to the
outside world...
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:05:16AM -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also have a local linux user's group and a mailing list.
A comment was made to the mailing list that mutt was handicapped.
Thanks to all you lot who helped...
Anyway, I've tracked the problem down - for some reason, the company mail
system is base64-encoding the encrypted part of the mail before delivering
it into my mailbox. Bizarre.
A quick wrapper script around GPG, and it's all fixed.
--
David Smith
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 05:34:15PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for that matter, is anything wrong with contrib/gpg.rc? works fine for
me.
Thanks to all that replied, I've checked my settings against a number of
yours, and they're pretty similar.
Yes, I've tried contrib/gpg.rc; that's
/manual.txt\n Show Mutt documentation
macro pager f1 !less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n Show Mutt documentation
set hostname=bristol.st.com
set folder=/u/dsmith/Mail
set spoolfile=imap://dave smith@bloodroot/inbox
set print_command=/pd/genscript/1.3.0/bin/genscript -p - --font
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 06:22:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% The first one (concerning this thread) is unrelated to the batching/scripting
% problem. I am simply unable to send a GPG-encrypted mail. I create the
Hokay. This certainly will require some debugging, but I haven't had
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 05:37:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that what you wish to accomplish (having mutt automatically
encrypt a file that you attach for sending) should be possible. My
suggestion there is to get the procedure nailed down manually and then
try working on
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:34:36AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GPG signing works fine - I can sign mails (like this one), but I just can't
encrypt them.
Of course, it helps if I actually do sign a mail when I say that I'm going
to...
--
David Smith Tel: +44 (0)1454
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:24:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will at some point either require you to
1. Have an empty passphrase (not recommended)
2. Enter your passphrase (not so practical, may be?)
3. Have a script that contains the passphrase (security issue,
Hi all. PGP/GPG newbie alert... :-)
As mentioned in another mail, I'm trying to mail some encrypted messages
around. I appear to be able to encrypt messages, but not decrypt them.
My mutt setup is as described in mutt-gnupg-howto.
Whenever I try to view an encrypted message, I get
Date:
Replying to my own mail...
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:11:28PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all. PGP/GPG newbie alert... :-)
As mentioned in another mail, I'm trying to mail some encrypted messages
around. I appear to be able to encrypt messages, but not decrypt them.
I've just
Hi all.
I'm trying to write a script which will mail any file specified as an
argument, to a specific user. However, I need the mail to be sent
GPG-encrypted. Obviously, I can use
cat file | gpg -e -a -r [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mutt -s Hello World [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or equivalent, but that's a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:30:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm not sure how to do this on the command line, but in a script
(or possibly on the command line given enough voodoo) you could
gpg-encrypt the file first, use --output to generate a gpg-crypted
output file, and then
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:46:17AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There do be something I miss since I moved from MS-windows to linux -
the file manager. (But I mean the old style one instead of the web-style.)
[snip]
There are loads of X and text-based file managers around. I'm an xterm
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:18:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear folks!
Seem to have a problem with mutt-1.3.27.
If I start it together with xterm (or also KDE konsole) using
xterm -e mutt
mutt and the xterm immediately crash without any output.
But If I start first xterm and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP
client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly,
but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines.
Good, provided you use a recent
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:20:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My mail is being rejected by a receiver's mail server
for policy reasons. Is there anything I can change
with mutt to stop this from happening?
Either your mail address, your ISP, or an SMTP server on the route have
Hi all.
I've got a couple of potential bugs, and some questions on how to
debug/report them.
First, the bugs:
o Mutt seems to be losing track of the number of new messages. Every
now and then, I end up with New: 1 in the status bar at the bottom
of the screen, but there aren't any
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:26:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure how to phrase this
My e-mail headers are being displayed in Mutt like so:
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3^M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR December 4,
36 matches
Mail list logo