* Robert Conde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.04 20:07 -0500]:
> Is there anything wrong with hitting F in the compose menu and filtering
> the message through the "gpg --clearsign" command?
Nothing at all. It leaves the other parts untouched though,
which is not (I don't think) desired in this ca
* Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.02.28 18:02 +]:
> No, what I was trying to say (perhaps I wasn't clear) is that
> you cannot get mutt to send mail to your public SMTP server,
> you have to run an SMTP server on your machine in order to get
> mutt to send mail. There are several suggest
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Jan 2002 19:04 -0500]:
> * Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
> > Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
> > think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
> > like:
>
Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Jan 2002 17:56 -0500]:
> I've seen something like this on this list in the past, *in
> jest*, in a similar thread:
>
>This line is quoted text>
>This line is quoted text>
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
> > 9o)
>
> BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10 Jan 2002 00:04 +0100]:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:47:50PM -0800, Jonathan Irving wrote:
> > Yes, but as has been pointed out a number of times, the patch
> > does not cause the MIME type to be set to text/plain.
>
> This is just wron
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09 Jan 2002 15:08 +0100]:
> * On 09-01-02 at 15:05
> * John Perry said
>
> > Did I miss a patch for this? Guess I was reading my mail too fast. Can
> > someone point me to it?
> Hi
> I hope were talking about the same thing, I'm very new to mutt.
> I mean the
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08 Jan 2002 21:35 +0100]:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> [body of message here]
>
> [sig here]
>
> It's supposed to just be signed. Is there a need for that top bit?
The "digital signature" is, I believe, a SHA1 hash of the message
co
Hey Nick
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08 Jan 2002 18:34 +0100]:
> * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 18:18]:
> > Nick --
> >
> > ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> > %
> > % Hi all
> > % When I pick up mails using Outlook I get 2 attachments. One containing
> > % my email message and th
Todd Kokoszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08 Jan 2002 08:32 -0800]:
> I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
> or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
You could make a macro like this:
macro pager d ""
HTH (untested)
cheers
j
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Inform
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:48:19PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:38:29 -0700
> > From: "Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: unsubscribe
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:26:55AM -0800, Marjo F. Mercado (dis)graced my inb
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 04:26:34PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:
> Is there anyway to tell mutt what addresses are considered "me" so that
> it won't include any of them when I hit "g" group reply? Or is there way
> to mutt respect the current "From:" and regard it as "me" ?
set alternates=...
HTH
che
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:18:36PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> I decided to give GnuPG a try. I've exported/imported my keys and
> configured Mutt. The only thing that remains a mystery is how to retrieve
> new public keys from within mutt. I wrote a little script for PGP I used
> to c
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:20:36PM -0700, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
> of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
> i can somehow train mutt to recognize th
Heya
I can't find any information in the mutt manual about the meaning
of the "*" character, when it appears in the child message
subject lines in the index. Can anyone tell me what it
signifies?
I have threading enabled and ascii_chars set (although this
character appears as a "*" in either ca
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:01:16PM +0200, Dumas Patrice wrote:
> When users haven't root privileges, it isn't possible to configure
> any MTA I know. Maybe there exits such a MTA, but I don't know it.
sendmail may be invoked from the command line by any user. In fact,
you can use it in place of
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 09:56:35AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
> (colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
i use epic with the lice script (nod to keso for the tip). i
recommend it highly. echoes is a lurvely theme.
www.
i recently landed on this, although the green part might have
to go away...
color normal whitedefault
color attachment cyandefault
color boldbrightwhite default
color underline yellow white
color error brightcyan default
color indicator cyandefault
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:15:33AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Jonathan --
>
> BTW, the real mutt-users address is above. What is this gbnet thing,
> anyway?
that's where majordomo thinks it lives. i guess mutt.org
may be an alias to gbnet.org.
> % contain the mbox 'from' line, mutt interprets
hi
has anyone encountered a problem with dtmail
'mailbox/rfc822' attachments? i find that because these
contain the mbox 'from' line, mutt interprets them as
separate emails, and they appear in my inbox rather than as
attachments to the original mail.
any idea how to stop this from happening?
20 matches
Mail list logo
